Seismic Retrofitting of RC Circular Columns Using Carbon Fiber, Glass Fiber, or Ductile PET Fiber
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effectiveness of seismic retrofitting using three different fibers—carbon fiber (CF), glass fiber (GF), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fiber—and a fiber combination of aramid fiber (AF) and PET fiber (called hybrid fiber reinforced polymer (HF)) wrapped on reinforced concrete (RC) circular columns was experimentally evaluated. A total of 11 RC circular columns were tested: three control columns and eight retrofitted columns in three different test groups. The purpose of fiber wrapping was flexural strength improvement as well as enhancement of rotational capacity in the plastic hinge region. Mechanical properties of CF, GF, AF, and PET were first defined; that is, CF, GF, and AF exhibited linear stress–strain behavior with limited ultimate strain capacity typically less than 3%, while ductile PET exhibited as much as 15% strain and non-linear stress–strain behavior with a very low elastic modulus. In the RC column tests, all three different fibers and the AF + PET fiber combination were effective in enhancing the strength and ductility but resulted in different structural behaviors and failure modes depending on the fiber type and the fiber amount used. The column sections were then analytically studied by section analysis using the behavior of confined concrete, the non-linear relationship of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and the actual material properties of reinforcement. The analytical and experimental results revealed that ductile PET is beneficial, as it demonstrates more ductile behavior with a degree of strength enhancement similar to that of CF and GF.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. American Concrete Institute Committee 440. (2003). Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars (ACI 440-1R-03). ACI, pp. 42.
2. American Concrete Institute Committee 440. (2007). Report on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (ACI PRC-440-07). ACI.
3. American Society for Testing and Materials International. (2008). Standard test method for tensile properties of plastic (ASTM D638-08). ASTM, pp. 16.
4. Anggawidjaja, D., Ueda, T., Dai, J., & Nakai, H. (2006). Deformation capacity of RC piers wrapped by new fiber-reinforced polymer with large fracture strain. Cement and Concrete Composites, 28, 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.07.011 ↗
5. Cao, V. V., & Pham, S. Q. (2019). Comparison of CFRP and GFRP wraps on reducing seismic damage of deficient reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17, 1667–1681.10.1007/s40999-019-00429-y ↗
6. Choi, D. U., Kang, T. H. K., Ha, S. S., Kim, K. H., & Kim, W. S. (2011). Flexural and bond behaviour of concrete beams strengthened with hybrid carbon-glass fiber-reinforced polymer sheets. ACI Structural Journal, 108, 90–98.
7. American Concrete Institute. (2013). Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads (374.2R-13) ACI, pp. 18.
8. Dai, J. G., Lam, L., & Ueda, T. (2012). Seismic retrofit of square RC columns with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibre reinforced polymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 27, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.058 ↗
9. Fahmy, M. F. M., & Wu, Z. (2010). Evaluating and proposing models of circular concrete columns confined with different FRP composites. Composite: Part B Engineering, 41, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2009.12.001 ↗
10. International Standard Organization. (2015). Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement of concrete—Test methods—part 2: FRP sheets (10406-2) ISO, pp.11.
11. Korea Concrete Institute. (2012). Korea Structural Concrete Design Code 2012. KCI.
12. Liu, J., & Sheikh, S. A. (2013). Fiber-reinforced polymer-confined circular columns under simulated seismic loads. ACI Structural Journal, 110, 941–952.
13. Liu, X., & Li, Y. (2018). Experimental study of seismic behavior of partially corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete columns strengthened with FRP composites with large deformability. Construction and Building Materials, 191, 1071–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.072 ↗
14. Mander, J. B., Priestly, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 114, 1804–1826.
15. Manders, P. W., & Bader, M. G. (1981). The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites: part 1 Failure strain enhancement and failure mode. Journal of Materials Science, 16, 2233–2245.10.1007/BF00542386 ↗
16. Mhanna, H. H., Hawileh, R. A., Abuzaid, W., Naser, M. Z., & Abdalla, J. (2020). Experimental investigation and modeling of the thermal effect on the mechanical properties of polyethylene-terephthalate FRP laminates. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(10), 04020296.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003389 ↗
17. Mirmiran, A., Shahawy, M., Samaan, M., Echary, H. E., Mastrapa, J. C., & Pico, O. (1998). Effect of column parameters on FRP-Confined Concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1998)2:4(175) ↗
18. Naser, M. Z., Hawileh, R. A., & Abdalla, J. A. (2019). Fiber-reinforced polymer composites in strengthening reinforced concrete structures: a critical review. Engineering Structures, 198, 109542.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109542 ↗
19. Parghi, A., & Alam, M. S. (2017). Seismic collapse assessment of non-seismically designed circular RC bridge piers retrofitted with FRP composites. Composite Structures, 160(15), 901–916.10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.094 ↗
20. Obaidat, Y.T., Ashteyat, A.M., Obaidat, A., Abu-Lebdeh, M.N. (2021), "Bond characteristics between concrete and near-surface mounted carbon fiber reinforced polymer cords. Journal of Structural Intengrity and Maintenance 6(4):223-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2021.195037910.1080/24705314.2021.1950379 ↗
21. Richart, F.E., Brandtzaeg, A., Brown, R.L. (1928). A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stress. Bulletin 190, Univ. of Illinois Engineering Experimental Station.
22. Saleem, S., Pimanmas, A., & Rattanapitikon, W. (2018). Lateral response of PET-FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 159, 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.11610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.116 ↗
23. Ueda, T., Dai, J., & Sato, Y. (2006). Unified analytical approaches for determining shear bond characteristics of FRP-concrete interfaces through pullout tests. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.4.13310.3151/jact.4.133 ↗
24. Youssf, O., ElGawady, M., & Mills, J. E. (2015). Displacement and plastic hinge length of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 101, 465–476.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026 ↗
25. Zhang, D., Zhao, Y., Jin, W., Ueda, T., & Nakai, H. (2017). Shear strengthening of corroded reinforced concrete columns using pet fiber-based composites. Engineering Structures, 153, 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.03010.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.030 ↗
26. Zhou, S. C., Demartino, C., Xu, J. J., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Effectiveness of CFRP seismic-retrofit of circular RC bridge piers under vehicular lateral impact loading. Engineering Structures, 243(15), 112602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11260210.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112602 ↗