journal article·2021-12Open access

Experimental Investigation of the Mechanical Behaviour of Wall–Beam–Strut Joints for Prefabricated Underground Construction

Tingjin Liu, Jiandong Lu, Di Wang, Hongyuan Liu

Abstract

Abstract Prefabricated construction is becoming increasingly prevalent, however, it is rarely applied in underground constructions, except for tunnel linings, due to the difficulties that arise in jointing various prefabricated components in underground conditions. To solve the vertical location problem of embedded mechanical couplers during the construction of wall–beam–strut joints for a prefabricated metro station, a new connection using welded steel plates is proposed. In this paper, four full-scale specimens of wall–beam–strut joints connected using welded steel plates and mechanical couplers were experimentally tested under monotonic and low-reversed cyclic loading conditions. The testing results were analysed in terms of the ultimate bearing capacity, failure mode, hysteresis, skeleton curve, stiffness degradation, energy dissipation and strain of the reinforcement bars. Notably, the two kinds of joints had similar ultimate bearing capacities and failure modes, but the crack distributions on the tops of the waler beams were different. For the specimens with the welded steel plate connection, tensile horizontal cracks first appeared on the top surface of the beam, where the welded steel plate was located, and then coalesced gradually; however, this cracking pattern was not observed during the experimental test of the specimens connected with the mechanical couplers. Furthermore, it was determined that the energy dissipation and ductility of the welded steel plate connection were better than those of the mechanical coupler connected joint, because the steel plate could redistribute the internal force in the joint and increase the stiffness. It was concluded that the proposed welded steel plate connection could be more favourable than the mechanical coupler connection in the construction of a prefabricated metro station in Guangzhou. Moreover, the results obtained from these experiments could provide guidelines for the corresponding connections employed in underground-prefabricated structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Aaleti, S., Brueggen, B. L., Johnson, B., et al. (2012). Cyclic response of reinforced concrete walls with different anchorage details: Experimental investigation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(7), 1181–1191.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000732 ↗
2. Choi, H. K., Choi, Y. C., & Choi, C. S. (2013). Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections. Engineering Structures, 56, 1820–1835.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.021 ↗
3. Ding, P., et al. (2018). Force transfer and deformation mechanism of single ring structure of prefabricated subway station. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University. (In Chinese).
4. Ding, P., et al. (2019a). Optimum design of closed cavity structure for prefabricated metro station. Journal of Bjing University of Technology, 45(10), 946–955. (In Chinese).
5. Ding, P., et al. (2019b). Three-dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station. Sustainable Cities and Society. 271–286.10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.010 ↗
6. Du, X. L., Liu, H. T., Lu, D. C., Xu, C. S., Luo, F. R., & Li, S. M. (2017). Study on seismic performance of sidewall joints in assembled monolithic subway station. China Civil Engineering Journal, 50(4), 38–47. (In Chinese).
7. Esmaeili, J., & Ahooghalandary, N. (2020). Introducing an easy-install precast concrete beam-to-column connection strengthened by steel box and peripheral plates. Engineering Structures, 205, 110006.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110006 ↗
8. Ghayeb, H. H., Razak, H. A., & RamliSulong, N. H. (2020). Seismic performance of innovative hybrid precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column connections. Engineering Structures, 202, 109886.10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109886 ↗
9. Gibb, A. G. F. (1999). Off-site fabrication: Prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularization. Hoboken: Wiley.
10. Gibb, A. (2007). Offsite construction industry survey—2006. London: Build Offsite.
11. Jacobsen, S. L. (1930). Steady forced vibration as influenced by damping. ASME Transaction, 52(1), 169–181.
12. Jaillon, L., & Poon, C. S. (2009). The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 239–248.10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.002 ↗
13. Kallolil, J. J., Chakrabarti, S. K., & Mishra, R. C. (1998). Experimental investigation of embedded steel plates in reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Structures, 20, 105–112.10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00045-X ↗
14. Pons, O. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of prefabricated buildings. In Eco-efficient construction and building materials (pp. 434–456).10.1533/9780857097729.3.434 ↗
15. Rüsch, H. (1960). Researches toward a general flexural theory for structural concrete. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 57(1), 1–28.
16. SCC (The State Council of the People’s Republic of China). (2016). Some opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on further strengthening the management of urban planning and construction. Beijing: SCC.
17. Shufeng, L., et al. (2018). Experimental study of a fabricated confined concrete beam-to-column connection with end-plates. Construction and Building Materials, 158, 208–216.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.025 ↗
18. Tao, L., et al. (2019). Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.10.1016/j.tust.2019.102994 ↗
19. Taylor, M. D. (2010). A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 28(8), 885–896.10.1080/01446193.2010.480976 ↗
20. Wang, D. C., Wang, G. F., Qiao, N., & Dai, C. S. (2018). The application and prospect analysis of prefabricated construction in underground engineering. China Sciencepaper, 13(1), 115–120. (In Chinese).
21. Yang, X. R., & Han, Y. Z., (2017). Closed cavity thin-wall components design for prefabricated underground subway structures. In Geo-Risk Conference 2017: Reliability-Based Design and Code Developments, Denver, USA (pp. 194–205).
22. Yang, X. R., & Huang, M. Q. (2018). Research strategies on new prefabricated technology of underground subway station. China Journal of Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 01, 78–85. (In Chinese).
23. Yang, X., Shi, Z., & Lin, F. (2019a). Research on shear capacity and checking method of MT·G-joint for application in prefabricated underground structures. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4065301.10.1155/2019/4065301 ↗
24. Yang, X., Shi, Z., & Lin, F. (2019b). Influence of geometrical parameters on performance of grouted mortise and tenon joints for application in prefabricated underground structures. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3747982.10.1155/2019/3747982 ↗
25. Zhang, X., et al. (2020a). Experimental study on bolted and anchored beam-to-column joints of prefabricated concrete frames. Advances in Structural Engineering, 23(2), 374–387.10.1177/1369433219872432 ↗
26. Zhang, J., et al. (2020b). Experimental seismic study of precast hybrid SFC/RC beam–column connections with different connection details. Engineering Structures, 208, 110295.10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110295 ↗