Effect of an Innovative Biofeedback Insole on Patient Rehabilitation after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Source abstract
Abstract
Partial weight bearing is fundamental to rehabilitation in the early stages following lower limb surgery. However, it remains debated as to how to properly achieve partial weight bearing while avoiding complications from excessive or premature load. Of the devices currently on the market, instrumented insoles coupled with force-sensitive resistors (FSRs) are among the best options in today’s clinical practice. Still, although several of these systems have been developed in the last few years, only some have been validated, leaving insufficient information on their application in rehabilitation after total knee replacement (TKR). To address this research gap, we evaluated the performance of an innovative biofeedback insole system featuring an extremely low response time for real-time force feedback. We randomly recruited 30 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. All patients used the new programmable insole for partial weight bearing per post-operative rehabilitation protocol. Our results confirm their inability to perform a correct gait with low partial weight bearing (<30–50% of their bodyweight). Partial weight bearing with a correct gait in the post-operative period is not obtainable without a measuring system. This new biofeedback insole is thus one of the most indicated and can improve rehabilitation compliance, therefore allowing continual patient monitoring for faster discharge and fast-track rehabilitation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery II, Suzzara Hospital, Via G. Cantore 14, 46029 Suzzara, Italy
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University HSR, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy
Bio Electro and Mechanical Systems (BEAMS) Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Low effectiveness of prescribed partial weight bearing continuous recording of vertical loads using a new pressure-sensitive insole10.1080/165019701300006533 ↗
2. Accuracy of determining the point of force application with piezoelettric force plates10.1016/0021-9290(90)90169-4 ↗
3. Is early weight bearing resumption beneficial after total hip replacement?10.1016/j.otsr.2008.12.001 ↗
4. Biofeedback versus physiotherapy in patients with partial weight-bearing
5. Partial versus unrestricted weight bearing after an uncemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: Recommendation of a concise rehabilitation protocol from a systematic review of the literature10.1007/s00402-009-1017-3 ↗
6. Predictors of partial weight-bearing performance after total hip arthroplasty10.2340/16501977-0480 ↗
7. Effect of physical activity on muscle and bone blood flow after fracture: Exercise and tenotomy studied in rats10.3109/17453679108993096 ↗
8. The effect of partial and full weight-bearing on venous return in the lower limb10.1302/0301-620X.83B7.0831037 ↗
9. van Lieshout, R., Pisters, M.F., Vanwanseele, B., de Bie, R.A., Wouters, E.J., and Stukstette, M.J. (2016). Biofeedback in partial weight bearing: Usability of two different devices from a patient’s and physical therapist’s perspective. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0165199 ↗
10. Biofeedback training for partial weight bearing in patients after total hip arthroplasty10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.011 ↗
11. Biofeedback in partial weight bearing: Validity of 3 different devices10.2519/jospt.2016.6625 ↗
12. Effectiveness of audio feedback for partial weight-bearing in and outside the hospital: A randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.019 ↗
13. Fast-track total knee arthroplasty improved clinical and functional outcome in the first 7 days after surgery: A randomized controlled pilot study with 5-year follow-up10.1007/s00402-018-3001-2 ↗
14. Pathway-controlled fast-track rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized prospective clinical study evaluating the recovery pattern, drug consumption, and length of stay10.1007/s00402-012-1528-1 ↗
15. A novel surgical technique to perform total knee arthroplasty in patients with inaccessible femoral medullary canal10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.043 ↗
16. A simple technique to perform total knee replacement without violating the femoral canal: Early clinical results on a cohort of 303 patients10.1007/s00590-020-02711-5 ↗
17. Asymmetric polyethylene inserts promote favorable kinematics and better clinical outcome compared to symmetric inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty10.1007/s00167-018-5207-9 ↗
18. Experimental and clinical analysis of the use of asymmetric vs symmetric polyethylene inserts in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.031 ↗
19. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0 ↗
20. Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00089-X ↗
21. The performance-oriented mobility assessment (Tinetti scale) in the assessment of falls: Analysis of the importance of each item
22. Development of the Italian version of the high-activity arthroplasty score (HAAS-I) following hip and knee total arthroplasty: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change10.1186/s13018-018-0782-5 ↗
23. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the chronic pain grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders10.1007/s10067-005-0140-y ↗
24. A Complications Following Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a National Database10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.055 ↗
25. (2021). Fedonnikov A, Andriyanova E, Kiselev A, Norkin I, Rehabilitation Process Issues and Functional Performance after Total Hip and Knee Replacement. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9091126 ↗
26. Ngueleu, A.M., Blanchette, A.K., Maltais, D., Moffet, H., McFadyen, B.J., Bouyer, L., and Batcho, C.S. (2019). Validity of Instrumented Insoles for Step Counting, Posture and Activity Recognition: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19112438 ↗
27. A Technological Review of the Instrumented Footwear for Rehabilitation with a Focus on Parkinson’s Disease Patients10.3389/fneur.2016.00001 ↗
28. Subramaniam, S., Majumder, S., Faisal, A.I., and Deen, M.J. (2022). Insole-Based Systems for Health Monitoring: Current Solutions and Research Challenges. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22020438 ↗