Proposal for Bond Strength Considering Bond Characteristics of Beam Flexural Rebar on Interior Beam-Column Joints. Part II: Focusing on Column Axial Load, Beam Flexural Rebar Yield Strength and Diameter
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To ensure the stability of interior beam-column joints under seismic loads, various influencing factors are incorporated into current design criteria in different countries. However, the design concepts and the influencing factors reflected in each country are different. The bond characteristics of beam longitudinal rebar penetrated the joint are mainly influenced by the compressive strength of concrete and are presented in the form of average bond stress. In Part I, the effect of concrete compressive strength on the bond characteristics of beam longitudinal rebar was directly investigated through a bond test that directly simulated the stress state of the joint. In this study, factors affecting the bond strength and required column depth were proposed by considering the bond characteristics based on the column axial force ratio and the yield strength of the beam longitudinal rebar. The experiment involved producing 14 test specimens and performing cyclic loading, taking each variable into consideration. Based on the experimental results, the proposed equation for the effect of column axial force ratio on the bond strength showed an excellent prediction performance compared to the current design equation with a coefficient of variation of 30.7%. In addition, a bond stress equation that reflects the stress difference of the beam longitudinal rebar was proposed using the strain values measured at both ends of the joint.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
2. AIJ (Architectural Institute of Japan). (2010). AIJ standard for structural calculation of reinforced concrete structures. Tokyo: AIJ.
3. ASTM. (2021). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohochen, PA: ASTM 2021.
4. Brooke, N. J., Megget, L. M., & Ingham, J. M. (2006) Bond performance of interior beam-column joints with high-strength reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 103(4), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.14359/1643610.14359/16436 ↗
5. Fujii, S., Murakami, H., Yamada, T., & Morita, S. (1991). Bond properties of beam through bars in high-strength reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute, 13(2), 483–488.
6. Gul, M. A. A., Khan, S. W., Noor, U. A., Khan, F. A., & Khaliq, W. (2024). Comparative study of RC and ECC beam-column connections with shear deficit spacing under quasi-static conditions. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 9(4), 2435187. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2024.243518710.1080/24705314.2024.2435187 ↗
7. Hakuto, S., Park, R., & Tanaka, H. (1999). Effect of deterioration of bond of beam bars passing through interior beam-column joints of flexural strength and ductility. ACI Structural Journal, 96(5), 858–864. https://doi.org/10.14359/74010.14359/740 ↗
8. Jo, M. S., Kim, H. G., Kim, D. H., Lim, S. A., Choi, Y. S., Lee, J. Y., & Kim K. H. (2025). Proposal for bond strength considering bond characteristics of beam flexural rebar on interior beam-column joints. Part I: Focusing on concrete compressive strength. International Journal of Concrete Structure Materials.10.1186/s40069-025-00813-0 ↗
9. NCREE (2019). Design Guideline for Building of High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Structures (Draft) (NCREE-19-001). Taipei, Taiwan: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering.
10. NZS 3101 (2006). Concrete structures standard part 1-the design of concrete structures, Wellington. Standards New Zealand: New Zealand.
11. Pantelides, C. P., Hansen, J., Ameli, M. J., & Reaveley, L. D. (2017). Seismic performance of reinforced concrete building exterior joints with substandard details. Journal of Structural Integrity & Maintenance, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2017.128058910.1080/24705314.2017.1280589 ↗
12. Park, R., & Ruitong, D. (1988). A comparison of the behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column joints designed for ductility and limited ductility. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 21(4), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.21.4.255-27810.5459/bnzsee.21.4.255-278 ↗
13. Saghafi, M. H., Shariatmadar, H., & Kheyroddin, A. (2019). Seismic behavior of high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites beam-column connection with high damage tolerance. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater, 13, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0334-310.1186/s40069-019-0334-3 ↗