journal article·2020-09-23Open access

Separating Landslide Source and Runout Signatures with Topographic Attributes and Data Mining to Increase the Quality of Landslide Inventory

Jhe-Syuan Lai

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 19

Abstract

Landslide sources and runout features of typical natural terrain landslides can be observed from a geotechnical perspective. Landslide sources are the major area of occurrences, whereas runout signatures reveal the subsequent phenomena caused by unstable gravity. Remotely sensed landslide detection generally includes runout areas, unless these results have been excluded manually through detailed comparison with stereo aerial photos and other auxiliary data. Areas detected using remotely sensed landslide detection can be referred to as “landslide-affected” areas. The runout areas should be separated from landslide-affected areas when upgrading landslide detections into a landslide inventory to avoid unreliable results caused by impure samples. A supervised data mining procedure was developed to separate landslide sources and runout areas based on four topographic attributes derived from a 10–m digital elevation model with a random forest algorithm and cost-sensitive analysis. This approach was compared with commonly used methods, namely support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR). The Typhoon Morakot event in the Laonong River watershed, southern Taiwan, was modeled. The developed models constructed using the limited training data sets could separate landslide source and runout signatures verified using the polygon and area constraint-based datasets. Furthermore, the performance of developed models outperformed SVM and LR algorithms, achieving over 80% overall accuracy, area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic, user’s accuracy, and producer’s accuracy in most cases. The agreement of quantitative evaluations between the area sizes of inventory polygons for training and the predicted targets was also observed when applying the supervised modeling strategy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Scripting STABL with PSO for analysis of slope stability10.1016/j.neucom.2012.10.048 ↗
2. The accuracy of equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis10.1016/0013-7952(80)90003-4 ↗
3. Landslide features identification and morphology investigation using high-resolution DEM derivatives10.1007/s11069-018-3543-1 ↗
4. Prakash, N., Manconi, A., and Loew, S. (2020). Mapping landslides on EO data: Performance of deep learning models vs. traditional machine learning models. Remote Sens., 12.10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-11876 ↗
5. Shirvani, Z., Abdi, O., and Buchroithner, M. (2019). A synergetic analysis of sentinel-1 and -2 for mapping historical landslides using object-oriented random forest in Hyrcanian forests. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11192300 ↗
6. Generating landslide inventory by participatory mapping: An example in Purwosari Area, Yogyakarta, Java10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.035 ↗
7. Yu, B., Chen, F., and Xu, C. (2020). Landslide detection based on contour-based deep learning framework in case of national scale of Nepal in 2015. Comput. Geosci., 135.10.1016/j.cageo.2019.104388 ↗
8. Post-disaster assessment of land-slides in southern Taiwan after 2009 Typhoon Morakot using remote sensing and spatial analysis10.5194/nhess-10-2179-2010 ↗
9. Landslide characteristics in the area of Xiaolin Village during Morakot typhoon10.1007/s12517-016-2342-9 ↗
10. Spatial relationships between landslide occurrences and land cover across the Arno river basin (Italy)10.1007/s12665-015-4569-2 ↗
11. Comparison of event landslide inventories: The Pogliaschina catchment test case, Italy10.5194/nhess-14-1749-2014 ↗
12. Catastrophic landslide induced by Typhoon Morakot, Shiaolin, Taiwan10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.013 ↗
13. Geomorphologic characteristics of catastrophic landslides during typhoon Morakot in the Kaoping Watershed, Taiwan10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.018 ↗
14. Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X ↗
15. Zhao, X., and Chen, W. (2020). GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility models using certainty factors and functional trees-based ensemble techniques. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010016 ↗
16. Pawluszek-Filipiak, K., Oreńczak, N., and Pasternak, M. (2020). Investigating the Effect of Cross-Modeling in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10186335 ↗
17. Wu, Y., Ke, Y., Chen, Z., Liang, S., Zhao, H., and Hong, H. (2020). Application of alternating decision tree with AdaBoost and bagging ensembles for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena, 187.10.1016/j.catena.2019.104396 ↗
18. Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010 ↗
19. Landslide hazard probability and risk assessment at the community level: A case of western Hubei, China10.5194/nhess-20-581-2020 ↗
20. Modeling the spatial occurrence of shallow landslides triggered by typhoons10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.11.020 ↗
21. Average landslide erosion rate at the watershed scale in southern Taiwan estimated from magnitude and frequency of rainfall10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.022 ↗
22. DEM resolution effects on shallow landslide hazard and soil redistribution modeling10.1002/esp.1155 ↗
23. Calibration and validation of rainfall thresholds for shallow landslide forecasting in Sicily, Southern Italy10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.10.019 ↗
24. Rainfall thresholds for possible landslide initiation in wildfire-affected area of western Greece10.1007/s10064-015-0762-5 ↗
25. Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001 ↗
26. Landslide inventories: The essential part of seismic landslide hazard analyses10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.06.013 ↗
27. Landslide inventories and their statistical properties10.1002/esp.1064 ↗
28. Shao, X., Ma, S., Xu, C., Shen, L., and Lu, Y. (2020). Inventory, distribution and geometric characteristics of landslides in Baoshan City, Yunnan province, China. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12062433 ↗
29. Comparing landslide inventory maps10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023 ↗
30. GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: An overview10.1191/0309133305pp462ra ↗
31. Statistical approach to storm event-induced landslide susceptibility10.5194/nhess-8-941-2008 ↗
32. Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00087-3 ↗
33. Combing multiple change detection indices for mapping landslides triggered by typhoons10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.07.021 ↗
34. Lai, J.-S., Chiang, S.-H., and Tsai, F. (2019). Exploring influence of sampling strategies on event-based landslide susceptibility modeling. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8090397 ↗
35. Analysis of topographic and vegetative factors with data mining for landslide verification10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.070 ↗
36. Convolutional neural network-optimized moth flame algorithm for shallow landslide susceptible analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973415 ↗
37. Mehrabi, M., Pradhan, B., Moayedi, H., and Alamri, A. (2020). Optimizing an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using four state-of-art metaheuristic techniques. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20061723 ↗
38. Hong, H., Tsangaratos, P., Ilia, I., Loupasakis, C., and Wang, Y. (2020). Introducing a novel multi-layer perceptron network based on stochastic gradient decent optimized by a meta-heuristic algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci. Total Environ., 742.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140549 ↗
39. Arabameri, A., Saha, S., Roy, J., Chen, W., Blaschke, T., and Bui, D.T. (2020). Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the Gallicash river watershed, Iran. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12030475 ↗
40. Luo, X., Lin, F., Zhu, S., Yu, M., Zhang, Z., Meng, L., and Peng, J. (2019). Mine landslide susceptibility assessment using IVM, ANN and SVM models considering the contribution of affecting factors. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0215134 ↗
41. Huang, F., Cao, Z., Guo, J., Jiang, S.-H., Li, S., and Guo, Z. (2020). Comparisons of heuristic, general statistical and machine learning models for landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping. Catena, 191.10.1016/j.catena.2020.104580 ↗
42. Chen, W., and Li, Y. (2020). GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility using hybrid computational intelligence models. Catena, 195.10.1016/j.catena.2020.104777 ↗
43. Meena, S.R., Mishra, B.K., and Piralilou, S.T. (2019). A hybrid spatial multi-criteria evaluation method for mapping landslide susceptibility areas in Kullu Valley, Himalayas. Geosciences, 9.10.3390/geosciences9040156 ↗
44. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
45. Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
46. Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.013 ↗
47. Díaz-Uriarte, R., and De Andres, S.A. (2006). Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinform., 7.10.1186/1471-2105-7-3 ↗
48. Lai, J.-S., and Tsai, F. (2019). Improving GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessments with multi-temporal remote sensing and machine learning. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19173717 ↗
49. An empirical evaluation of adaboost extensions for cost-sensitive classification
50. Shallow and deep-seated landslide differentiation using support vector machines: A case study of the Chuetsu Area, Japan10.3319/TAO.2014.12.02.07(EOSI) ↗
51. Simulation of event-based landslides and debris flows at watershed level10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.09.016 ↗
52. National Disaster Prevention and Protection Commission (NDPPC) (2009). Disaster Response Disposition Report of Typhoon Morakot, National Disaster Prevention and Protection Commission.
53. Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using random forests10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.007 ↗
54. Land-cover classification of full-waveform LiDAR point cloud with volumetric texture measures10.3319/TAO.2016.02.19.01(ISRS) ↗
55. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., and Hall, M.A. (2011). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann. [3rd ed.].
56. Elkan, C. (2001, January 4–10). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, VA, USA.
57. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001 ↗
58. Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.020 ↗
59. Pham, B.T., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Qi, C., Phong, T.V., Dou, J., Ho, L.S., Le, H.V., and Prakash, I. (2020). Coupling RBF neural network with ensemble learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Catena, 195.10.1016/j.catena.2020.104805 ↗
60. Random forest and rotation forest for fully polarized SAR image classification using polarimetric and spatial features10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.002 ↗
61. Saleem, N., Huq, M.E., Twumasi, N.Y.D., Javed, A., and Sajjad, A. (2019). Parameters derived from and/or used with digital elevation models (DEMs) for landslide susceptibility mapping and landslide risk assessment: A review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8120545 ↗
62. Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.006 ↗
63. Could surface roughness be a poor proxy for landslide age? Results from the Swabian Alb, Germany10.1002/esp.3630 ↗
64. Object-oriented identification of forested landslides with derivatives of single pulse LiDAR data
65. Sensitivity analysis of automatic landslide mapping: Numerical experiments towards the best solution10.1007/s10346-018-0986-0 ↗