VNF Placement for Service Function Chains with Strong Low-Delay Restrictions in Edge Computing Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The edge computing paradigm, allowing the location of network services close to end users, defines new network scenarios. One of them considers the existence of micro data centers, with reduced resources but located closer to service requesters, to complement remote cloud data centers. This hierarchical and geo-distributed architecture allows the definition of different time constraints that can be taken into account when mapping services into data centers. This feature is especially useful in the Virtual Network Function (VNF) placement problem, where the network functions composing a Service Function Chain (SFC) may require more or less strong delay restrictions. We propose the ModPG (Modified Priority-based Greedy) heuristic, a VNF placement solution that weighs the latency, bandwidth, and resource restrictions, but also the instantiation cost of VNFs. ModPG is an improved solution of a previous proposal (called PG). Although both heuristics share the same optimization target, that is the reduction of the total substrate resource cost, the ModPG heuristic identifies and solves a limitation of the PG solution: the mapping of sets of SFCs that include a significant proportion of SFC requests with strong low-delay restrictions. Unlike PG heuristic performance evaluation, where the amount of SFC requests with strong low-delay restrictions is not considered as a factor to be analyzed, in this work, both solutions are compared considering the presence of 1%, 15%, and 25% of this type of SFC request. Results show that the ModPG heuristic optimizes the target cost similarly to the original proposal, and at the same time, it offers a better performance when a significant number of low-delay demanding SFC requests are present.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Software-Defined Networks and 5G · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Information Technologies and Communications, Universidad Politecnica de Cartagena, E-30202 Cartagena, Spain
Funding
AEI/FEDER, UE Project Grants
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Next generation cloud computing: New trends and research directions10.1016/j.future.2017.09.020 ↗
2. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198 ↗
3. The emergence of edge computing10.1109/MC.2017.9 ↗
4. Internet of Things (IoT), mobile cloud, cloudlet, mobile IoT, IoT cloud, fog, mobile edge, and edge emerging computing paradigms: Disambiguation and research directions10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.021 ↗
5. Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges10.1109/COMST.2015.2477041 ↗
6. Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations10.1109/MCOM.2015.7045396 ↗
7. Yia, B., Wang, X., Lic, K., Das, S.K., and Huang, M. (2018). A comprehensive survey of Network Function Virtualization. Comput. Netw., 212–262.10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.021 ↗
8. Towards a virtual network function research agenda: A systematic literature review of VNF design considerations10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102417 ↗
9. Flexibility in softwarized networks: Classifications and research challenges10.1109/COMST.2019.2892806 ↗
10. Cost-Efficient Service Function Chain Orchestration for Low-Latency Applications in NFV Networks10.1109/JSYST.2018.2879883 ↗
11. Virtual network function embedding in real cloud environments10.1016/j.comnet.2015.09.034 ↗
12. Complementing IoT Servthe hrough Software Defined Networking and Edge Computing: A Comprehensive Survey10.1109/COMST.2020.2997475 ↗
13. Virtual network function placement and resource optimization in NFV and edge computing enabled networks10.1016/j.comnet.2019.01.036 ↗
14. VNF-FG design and VNF placement for 5G mobile networks10.1007/s11432-016-9031-x ↗
15. Low Latency Security Function Chain Embedding Across Multiple Domains10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2791963 ↗
16. Fotoglou, I., Papathanail, G., Pentelas, A., and Papadimitriou, S. (July, January 29). Towards Cross-Slice Communication for Enhanced Service Delivery at the Network Edge. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), Virtual Conference, Ghent, Belgium.
17. The Pandora of Network Slicing: A Multi-Criteria Analysis10.1002/ett.3651 ↗
18. Zhang, Q., Liu, F., and Zeng, C. (May, January 29). Adaptive Interference-Aware VNF Placement for Service-Customized 5G Network Slices. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Paris, France.10.1109/INFOCOM.2019.8737660 ↗
19. On Orchestrating Service Function Chains in 5G Mobile Network10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895316 ↗
20. Recent Advances of Resource Allocation in Network Function Virtualization10.1109/TPDS.2020.3017001 ↗
21. (2020, August 26). Gurobi Optimizer. Available online: https://www.gurobi.com/products/gurobi-optimizer.
22. Medina, A., Lakhina, A., Matta, I., and Byers, J. (2005, January 27–29). BRITE: An Approach to Universal Topology Generation. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA.
23. Routing of Multipoint Connections10.1109/49.12889 ↗
24. The Global k-means clustering algorithm10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2 ↗