journal article·2018-12Open access

Experimental and Analytical Studies of U-Shaped Thin-Walled RC Beams Under Combined Actions of Torsion, Flexure and Shear

Jianchao Xu, Shenggang Chen, Quanquan Guo, Yinghua Ye, Bo Diao, Y. L. Mo

Abstract

U-shaped thin-walled concrete bridge beams usually suffer the combined actions of flexure, shear and torsion, but no research about the behavior of U-shaped thin-walled RC beams under combined actions has been reported in literature. Three large specimens of U-shaped thin-walled RC beams were tested under different torque–bending moment ratios (T–M ratios) of 1:5, 1:1 and 1:0 to investigate the mechanical responses such as crack patterns, reinforcement strains, failure modes and ductility. The testing results showed that ductile flexural failures occurred for all three of the U-shaped thin-walled beam specimens, although the combined shear effect of circulatory torque, warping torque and shear force increased as the T–M ratio increased from 1:5 via 1:1 to 1:0, reflected by diagonal cracks and stirrup strains. More specifically, basically symmetrical flexural failure was dominated by the bending moment when the T–M ratio was 1:5; flexural failure of the loaded half of the U-shaped thin-walled section was dominated by the combined action of the bending moment and warping moment, while there were only a few cracks on the other half of the U-shaped section when the T–M ratio was 1:1; and anti-symmetrical flexural failure was dominated by the warping moment when the T–M ratio was 1:0 (pure torsion). A simple method to calculate the ultimate load of such U-shaped thin-walled RC beams under different T–M ratios was suggested, and the calculating results were corresponding well with the experimental results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI 318-14. (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. Aminbaghai, M., Murin, J., Hrabovsky, J., & Mang, H. A. (2016). Torsional warping eigenmodes including the effect of the secondary torsion moment on the deformations. Engineering Structures, 106, 299–316.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.022 ↗
3. Bernardo, L., Andrade, J., & Lopes, S. (2012a). Modified variable angle truss-model for torsion in reinforced concrete beams. Materials and Structures, 45(12), 1877–1902.10.1617/s11527-012-9876-4 ↗
4. Bernardo, L., Andrade, J., & Lopes, S. (2012b). Softened truss model for reinforced NSC and HSC beams under torsion: A comparative study. Engineering Structures, 42, 278–296.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.036 ↗
5. Bernardo, L. F. A., Andrade, J. M. A., & Nunes, N. C. G. (2015). Generalized softened variable angle truss-model for reinforced concrete beams under torsion. Materials and Structures, 7, 2169–2193.10.1617/s11527-014-0301-z ↗
6. Bernardo, L. F. A., Andrade, J. M. A., & Pereira-De-Oliveira, L. A. (2013). Reinforced and prestressed concrete hollow beams under torsion. Journal of Civil Engineering & Management, 19(2334), S141–S152.10.3846/13923730.2013.801895 ↗
7. Chen, S., Diao, B., Guo, Q., Ch, S., & Ye, Y. (2016a). Experiments and calculation of U-shaped thin-walled RC members under pure torsion. Engineering Structures, 106, 1–14.10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.019 ↗
8. Chen, S., Ye, Y., Guo, Q., Cheng, S., & Diao, B. (2016b). Nonlinear model to predict the torsional response of U-shaped thin-walled RC members. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 60(6), 1039–1061.10.12989/sem.2016.60.6.1039 ↗
9. Elfgren, L., Karlsson, I., & Losberg, A. (1974). Torsion-bending-shear interaction for concrete beams. Journal of the Structural Division, 100(8), 1657–1676.10.1061/JSDEAG.0003843 ↗
10. Erkmen, R. E., & Mohareb, M. (2006). Torsion analysis of thin-walled beams including shear deformation effects. Thin-Walled Structures, 44(10), 1096–1108.10.1016/j.tws.2006.10.012 ↗
11. GB50010. (2010). Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press.
12. Greene, G., & Belarbi, A. (2009a). Model for reinforced concrete members under torsion, bending, and shear. I: theory. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-Asce, 135(9), 961–969.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:9(961) ↗
13. Greene, G., Jr., & Belarbi, A. (2009b). Model for reinforced concrete members under torsion, bending, and shear. II: Model application and validation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics—ASCE, 135(9), 970–977.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:9(970) ↗
14. He, E. (2003). Application of channel girders in project of urban rail transit. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2, 13–16.
15. Hsu, T. T., & Mo, Y. (1985). Softening of concrete in torsional members—Theory and tests. ACI Journal Proceedings, 82(3), 290–303.
16. Hwang, C.-S., & Hsu, T. T. (1983). Mixed torsion analysis of reinforced concrete channel beams—A Fourier series approach. ACI Journal Proceedings, 80(5), 377–386.
17. Jeng, C. H. (2015). Unified softened membrane model for torsion in hollow and solid reinforced concrete members: modeling precracking and postcracking behavior. Journal of Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001212 .10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001212 ↗
18. Jeng, C.-H., & Hsu, T. T. (2009). A softened membrane model for torsion in reinforced concrete members. Engineering Structures, 31(9), 1944–1954.10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.038 ↗
19. Krpan, P., & Collins, M. P. (1981a). Testing thin-walled open RC structure in torsion. Journal of the Structural Division, 107(6), 1129–1140.10.1061/JSDEAG.0005724 ↗
20. Krpan, P., & Collins, M. P. (1981b). Predicting torsional response of thin-walled open RC members. Journal of the Structural Division, 107(6), 1107–1127.10.1061/JSDEAG.0005723 ↗
21. Liang, L., Tadepalli, P. R., Mo, Y. L., & Hsu, T. T. C. (2016). Simulation of prestressed steel fiber concrete beams subjected to shear. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(3), 1–10.
22. Luccioni, B. M., Reimund, J. C., & Danesi, R. (1996). Thin-walled prestressed concrete members under combined loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 3, 291–297.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(291) ↗
23. Luccioni, B., Reimundin, J., Danesi, R., & Venant, S. (1991). Prestressed concrete I-beams under combined mixed torsion, flexure and shear. In ICE proceedings, Thomas Telford.
24. Mitchell, D., & Collins, M. P. (1974). Diagonal compression field theory—A rational model for structural concrete in pure torsion. ACI Journal Proceedings, 71, 396–408.
25. Murín, J., & Kutiš, V. (2008). An effective finite element for torsion of constant cross-sections including warping with secondary torsion moment deformation effect. Engineering Structures, 30(10), 2716–2723.10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.004 ↗
26. Pang, X. B., & Hsu, T. T. C. (1995). Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear. ACI Structural Journal, 92(6), 665–679.
27. Pavazza, R. (2005). Torsion of thin-walled beams of open cross-section with influence of shear. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 47(7), 1099–1122.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.007 ↗
28. Rahal, K. N. (2007). Combined torsion and bending in reinforced and prestressed concrete beams using simplified method for combined stress-resultants. ACI Structural Journal, 104(4), 402–411.
29. Rahal, K. N., & Collins, M. P. (1995a). Effect of thickness of concrete cover on shear-torsion interaction—An experimental investigation. ACI Structural Journal, 92(3), 334–342.
30. Rahal, K. N., & Collins, M. P. (1995b). Analysis of sections subjected to combined shear and torsion—A theoretical model. ACI Structural Journal, 92(4), 459–469.
31. Rahal, K., & Collins, M. P. (2003). Combined torsion and bending in reinforced and prestressed concrete beams. ACI Structural Journal, 100(2), 157–165.
32. Rahal, K. N., & Collins, M. P. (2006). Compatibility torsion in spandrel beams using modified compression field theory. ACI Structural Journal, 103(3), 328–338.
33. Tadepalli, P. R., Dhonde, H. B., Mo, Y. L., & Hsu, T. T. C. (2015). Shear strength of prestressed steel fiber concrete I-beams. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(3), 267–281.10.1007/s40069-015-0109-4 ↗
34. Vecchio, F., & Collins, M. (1981). Stress–strain characteristics of reinforced concrete in pure shear. Final Report (pp. 211–225).
35. Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1986). The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal Proceedings, 83(2), 219–231.
36. Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1988). Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using the modified compression field theory. ACI Structural Journal, 85(3), 258–268.
37. Vlasov, V. Z. (1961). Thin-walled elastic beams. Washington DC: Office of Technical Services, U.S. Department of Commerce.
38. Wang, Q., Qiu, W. L., & Zhang, Z. (2015). Torsion strength of single-box multi-cell concrete box girder subjected to combined action of shear and torsion. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 55(5), 953–964.10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.953 ↗
39. Zbirohowski-Koscia, K. (1968). Stress analysis of cracked reinforced and prestressed concrete thin-walled beams and shells. Magazine of Concrete Research, 20(65), 213–220.10.1680/macr.1968.20.65.213 ↗