journal article·2026-05-04Open access

Development of Heavyweight Anti-Washout Self-Compacting Concrete Using Heavyweight Fine Aggregates Including Copper Slag

Hoon Moon, Ji-Hyun Kim, Indong Jang, Chul-Woo Chung

Abstract

This study developed anti-washout self-compacting heavyweight concrete using industrial by-product copper slag. Fresh-state flow behavior, anti-washout performance, compressive strength, and resistance against chloride penetration were evaluated. Preliminary experiments on cement paste were conducted to obtain the proportion of anti-washout and high-range water-reducing agents for anti-washout self-compacting concrete and anti-washout self-compacting heavyweight concrete. Copper slag and magnetite ore fine were used as heavyweight fine aggregates. The results showed that appropriate control of high range water reducer is critical for stable underwater placement. Excessive demand of high range water reducer, particularly in mixtures incorporating heavyweight coarse aggregates or fibers, led to severe washout despite their higher flowability. In contrast, anti-washout self-compacting heavyweight concrete incorporating heavyweight fine aggregates exhibited stable underwater casting with minimal washout, and achieved 28-day compressive strengths comparable to those of the corresponding AW-SCC mixtures. All anti-washout self-compacting heavyweight concrete satisfied the required air-to-underwater strength ratio, and chloride resistance was classified as low penetrability. These results demonstrate that the strategic use of heavyweight fine aggregates enables the production of anti-washout self-compacting heavyweight concrete with adequate underwater casting stability, providing a practical solution for construction of marine and underwater infrastructure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Akkurt, I., Basyigit, C., Kilincarslan, S., Mavi, B., & Akkurt, A. (2006). Radiation shielding of concretes containing different aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites, 28(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.006 ↗
2. Alami, M. M., & Erdem, T. K. (2022). Effects of mix-design variables on the workability, rheology and stability of self-consolidating concrete. Revista De La Construcción, 21(3), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.21.3.70310.7764/RDLC.21.3.703 ↗
3. Al-Jabri, K. S., Hisada, M., Al-Oraimi, S. K., & Al-Saidy, A. H. (2009). Copper slag as sand replacement for high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(7), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.00710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.007 ↗
4. Alyaseen, A., Poddar, A., Alahmad, H., Kumar, N., & Sihag, P. (2023). High-performance self-compacting concrete with recycled coarse aggregate: Comprehensive systematic review on mix design parameters. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 8(3), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2023.221185010.1080/24705314.2023.2211850 ↗
5. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2021). Standard specification for mixing rooms, moist cabinets, moist rooms, and water storage tanks used in the testing of hydraulic cements and concretes (ASTM C511). ASTM International.
6. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2022). Standard specification for portland cement (ASTM C150-22). ASTM International.
7. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2023). Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the field (ASTM C31/C31M). ASTM International.
8. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2023). Standard specification for concrete aggregates (ASTM C33). ASTM International.
9. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2023). Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (mortar-bar method) (ASTM C1260). ASTM International.
10. Atash Beik, M. R., Moghadam, K. Y., Noori, M., Altabey, W. A., Chang, X., Liu, C., Wang, X., & Noroozinejad Farsangi, E. (2024). Using biopolymers as anti-washout admixtures under water concreting. Buildings, 14(4), Article 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1404114010.3390/buildings14041140 ↗
11. Ayano, T., & Sakata, K. (2000, April). Durability of concrete with copper slag fine aggregate. In 2000 CanMET/ACI Conference on Durability of Concrete (pp. 141–157). American Concrete Institute. https://doi.org/10.14359/574610.14359/5746 ↗
12. Barnes, H. A. (1997). Thixotropy—A review. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 70(1–2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0257(97)00004-910.1016/S0377-0257(97)00004-9 ↗
13. Bashter, I. I. (1997). Calculation of radiation attenuation coefficients for shielding concretes. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 24(17), 1389–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4549(97)00003-010.1016/S0306-4549(97)00003-0 ↗
14. Björnström, J., & Chandra, S. (2003). Effect of superplasticizers on the rheological properties of cements. Materials and Structures, 36(10), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0247950310.1007/BF02479503 ↗
15. Bouali, E., Ayadi, A., Kadri, E. H., Kaci, A., Soualhi, H., & Kallel, A. (2020). Rheological and mechanical properties of heavy density concrete including barite powder. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(5), 3999–4011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04331-610.1007/s13369-019-04331-6 ↗
16. American Concrete Institute. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.
17. Chalee, W., Jaiyong, A., Cheewaket, T., & Jaturapitakkul, C. (2023). An empirical model to predict chloride penetrations in concrete containing palm oil fuel ash based on 10-year exposure under marine environment. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 17(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-023-00621-410.1186/s40069-023-00621-4 ↗
18. Chatzopoulos, A., Sideris, K. K., & Tassos, C. (2021). Production of concretes using slag aggregates: Contribution of increasing the durability and sustainability of constructions. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, Article e00711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0071110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00711 ↗
19. American Concrete Institute. (2013). Code requirements for nuclear safety-related concrete structures (ACI 349-13). American Concrete Institute.
20. American Concrete Institute. (2004). Guide for the placement of concrete by pumping methods (ACI 304.3R-04). American Concrete Institute.
21. De Alwis, S. T. P., Asadollahfardi, G., Samadi, Y., Fazeli, R., & Yahyaei, B. (2025). Artificial neural network modeling of self-compacting concrete mixed and cured with seawater for compressive strength and chloride penetration prediction. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 10(4), 2558425. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2025.255842510.1080/24705314.2025.2558425 ↗
22. Grzeszczyk, S., Jurowski, K., Bosowska, K., & Grzymek, M. (2019). The role of nanoparticles in decreased washout of underwater concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 203, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.11810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.118 ↗
23. Hwang, C. L., & Laiw, J. C. (1989). Properties of concrete using copper slag as a substitute for fine aggregate. Special Publication, 114, 1677–1696. https://doi.org/10.14359/198610.14359/1986 ↗
24. Korea Concrete Institute. (2016). KCI-CT102: Method for preparing underwater specimens for compressive strength testing of anti-washout concrete. In Concrete Society Standards (pp. 12–14). Kimoondang Publishing.
25. Khaleel, O. R., Al-Mishhadani, S. A., & Razak, H. A. (2011). The effect of coarse aggregate on fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Procedia Engineering, 14, 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.10210.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.102 ↗
26. Khayat, K. H. (1995). Effects of antiwashout admixtures on fresh concrete properties. Materials Journal, 92(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.14359/976710.14359/9767 ↗
27. Khayat, K. H. (1998). Viscosity-enhancing admixtures for cement-based materials—An overview. Cement and Concrete Composites, 20(2–3), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(98)80006-110.1016/S0958-9465(98)80006-1 ↗
28. Khayat, K. H., & Assaad, J. (2003). Relationship between washout resistance and rheological properties of high-performance underwater concrete. Materials Journal, 100(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.14359/1261810.14359/12618 ↗
29. Khayat, K. H., & Sonebi, M. (2001). Effect of mixture composition on washout resistance of highly flowable underwater concrete. Materials Journal, 98(4), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.14359/1039710.14359/10397 ↗
30. Kim, H., Lee, C. J., Shon, C. S., Moon, H., & Chung, C. W. (2020). Mechanical performance and chloride ion penetration of polyolefin fiber reinforced concrete designed for shotcreting at marine environment. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 5(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2019.169216410.1080/24705314.2019.1692164 ↗
31. Kim, I. C., & Park, K. C. (2019). Experimental study on hydraulic performance of perforated caisson breakwater with turning wave blocks. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 33(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2018.08410.26748/KSOE.2018.084 ↗
32. Kim, T. H., Eum, K. Y., Sun, C. H., & Kim, I. H. (2025). Corrosion characteristics of prestressing strands and reinforcing bars under accelerated corrosion conditions. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 19(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-024-00759-910.1186/s40069-024-00759-9 ↗
33. Korea Concrete Institute. (2016). KCI-AD102: Quality standards for anti-washout admixtures for concrete. In Concrete Society Standards (pp. 87–97). Kimoondang Publishing.
34. Korea Concrete Institute. (2016). KCI-CT105: Underwater slump-flow test method for anti-washout concrete. In Concrete Society Standards (pp. 22–25). Kimoondang Publishing.
35. Lu, H., Sun, X., & Ma, H. (2022). Anti-washout concrete: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 344, Article 128151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12815110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128151 ↗
36. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. (2006). Concrete microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-hill.
37. Mishra, P., Behera, P. K., & Misra, S. (2026). Influence of rebar/concrete interface restraint in governing corrosion-induced cracking of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 11(1), Article 2595370. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2025.259537010.1080/24705314.2025.2595370 ↗
38. Moon, H., Kim, J. H., Lee, J. Y., & Chung, C. W. (2017). Evaluation of chloride attack resistibility of heavyweight concrete using copper slag and magnetite as aggregate. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 17(6), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.6.48310.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.6.483 ↗
39. Muis, S., Güneralp, B., Jongman, B., Aerts, J. C., & Ward, P. J. (2015). Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data. Science of the Total Environment, 538, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.06810.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068 ↗
40. Nath, P., & Sarker, P. K. (2014). Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
41. Neumann, J. E., Price, J., Chinowsky, P., Wright, L., Ludwig, L., Streeter, R., Jones, R., Smith, J. B., Perkins, W., Jantarasami, L., & Martinich, J. (2015). Climate change risks to US infrastructure: Impacts on roads, bridges, coastal development, and urban drainage. Climatic Change, 131(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1037-410.1007/s10584-013-1037-4 ↗
42. Neville, A. M. (1995). Properties of concrete (Vol. 4, p. 1995). Longman.
43. Nisar, N., & Bhat, J. A. (2021). Effect of coupled deterioration mechanisms on corrosion of steel reinforcement: The role of chloride ion ingress, freeze–thaw cycles and green corrosion inhibitor. Journal of Bio-and Tribo-Corrosion, 7(3), Article 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00564-x10.1007/s40735-021-00564-x ↗
44. Otsuki, N., Hisada, M., Nagataki, S., & Kamada, T. (1996). An experimental study on the fluidity of antiwashout underwater concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 93(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.14359/979210.14359/9792 ↗
45. Pal, S. C., Mukherjee, A., & Pathak, S. R. (2003). Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(9), 1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00062-010.1016/S0008-8846(03)00062-0 ↗
46. Ren, Z., & Li, D. (2023). Application of steel slag as an aggregate in concrete production: A review. Materials, 16(17), Article 5841. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1617584110.3390/ma16175841 ↗
47. Sagar, C., & Sharma, U. K. (2025). Role of concrete design parameters in preventing corrosion-driven failures in reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 10(4), Article 2557075. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2025.255707510.1080/24705314.2025.2557075 ↗
48. Shi, C., Meyer, C., & Behnood, A. (2008). Utilization of copper slag in cement and concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(10), 1115–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.00810.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.008 ↗
49. Shin, T. Y., Kim, J. H., & Han, S. H. (2017). Rheological properties considering the effect of aggregates on concrete slump flow. Materials and Structures, 50(6), Article 239. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1104-910.1617/s11527-017-1104-9 ↗
50. Sikandar, M. A., Wazir, N. R., Khan, A., Nasir, H., Ahmad, W., & Alam, M. (2020). Effect of various anti-washout admixtures on the properties of non-dispersible underwater concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 245, Article 118469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11846910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118469 ↗
51. Topçu, İB. (2003). Properties of heavyweight concrete produced with barite. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(6), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01063-310.1016/S0008-8846(02)01063-3 ↗
52. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1989). CRD-C 61-89A: Test method for determining the resistance of freshly mixed concrete to washing out in water. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
53. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2006). CRD-C 661-06: Specification for antiwashout admixtures for concrete. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
54. Vousdoukas, M. I., Mentaschi, L., Voukouvalas, M., Verlaan, M., Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L. P., & Feyen, L. (2018). Global probabilistic projections of extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 2360. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w ↗
55. Wang, H., Yu, Y., Zhang, P., Yang, C., Wen, H., Zhang, F., & Du, S. (2024). Study on the diffusion mechanism of infiltration grouting in fault fracture zone considering the time-varying characteristics of slurry viscosity under seawater environment. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 18(1), Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-024-00704-w10.1186/s40069-024-00704-w ↗
56. Zhang, M., & Wang, W. (2020, February). Effect of superplasticizer in anti-washout admixture on paste. In IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering (vol. 758, no. 1, p. 012070). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/758/1/01207010.1088/1757-899X/758/1/012070 ↗
57. Zhang, H., Tang, P., Chen, Y., Hu, S., Tang, Y., Yang, K., & Wang, Q. (2024). Konjac glucomannan: A promising environmental friendly anti-washout agent for ordinary Portland cement mortar. Industrial Crops and Products, 219, Article 119189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.11918910.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119189 ↗
58. Zhang, Y., Ye, Y., Wang, J., Tang, B., & Fu, F. (2025). Strength prediction of self-compacting concrete using improved RVM machine learning method. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 19(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-025-00835-810.1186/s40069-025-00835-8 ↗