journal article·2026-04-29Open access

Concrete Durability in Arid Region: Influence of Seasonal Temperature and Humidity Variation on Sulfate Attack on Modified Cement Mortar

Mohsina M. Sherief, Remilekun A. Shittu, Fatima I. Alhamadi, Ahmed Alkaabi, Akram Alfantazi

Abstract

Concrete in harsh environments faces significant durability risks, mainly from external sulfate attack. This study investigates the impact of seasonal variations in temperature and humidity on ESA by comparing the performance of samples containing ordinary Portland cement (O) and modified mix containing silica fume and GGBFS (SG). These samples were exposed to 10% Na 2 SO 4 solution under three distinct exposure conditions that simulate seasonal change: high temperature (50 °C) complete immersion; high humidity (22 °C) and moisture flux (50 °C) through partial immersion; and wet-dry cycles (Wet at 22 °C- Dry at 50 °C). A multi-faceted analysis reveals that SG sample under high temperature has the most detrimental effect on accelerating sulfate attack, including mass (− 1.5%) and volume (+ 4.5%) change, compressive (− 2.2%) and flexural (+ 3%) strength, ultrasound pulse velocity (− 2.1%), and elastic dynamic modulus (+ 1%). Microscopic analysis shows the presence of ettringite, gypsum and physical attack through crystallization of mirabilite in the middle portion, under high humidity conditions. The high moisture flux at high temperature showed the presence of ettringite in the evaporation interface zone and gypsum. The wet-dry cycles introduce a dual degradation mechanism—chemical degradation and physical attack through the crystallization of thenardite. While the modified mix consistently demonstrated superior resistance to sulfate ingress under high humidity, they were vulnerable to the accelerated degradation caused by high temperatures. Statistical correlation was performed to understand the inter-relation between parameters and regression was done to establish a connection between destructive and non-destructive tests.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Fire effects on concrete materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Alhamadi, F. I., Shittu, R. A., Sherief, M., AlFantazi, A., & AlKaabi, A. (2025). Durability and radiation shielding performance of mineral-admixture concrete exposed to sulfate and thermal degradation. In: Int. Conf. Civ. Struct. Transp. Eng., Avestia Publishing. https://doi.org/10.11159/iccste25.29810.11159/iccste25.298 ↗
2. AlHamadi, F. I., Shittu, R. A., Sherief, M., AlFantazi, A., & Alkaabi, A. K. (2025). Durability and radiation shielding performance of blended cement mortar under increased ambient temperature and sulfate exposure in arid environments. Scientific Reports, 16(1), Article 922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30508-110.1038/s41598-025-30508-1 ↗
3. Al-Jabari, M. (2022). Integral waterproofing of concrete structures: advanced protection technologies of concrete by pore blocking and lining. Woodhead Publishing.
4. Alshenawy, A. O., Hamid, W. M., & Alnuaim, A. M. (2021). A review on the characteristics of sabkha soils in the Arabian Gulf Region. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(19), Article 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08275-w10.1007/s12517-021-08275-w ↗
5. Bameri, M., Mohammadhasani, M., Khaloo, A., Ashour, A., & NikKhah, M. (2025). Influence of waste glass powder as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) on the mechanical properties, expansion, environmental impact, and microstructure of cementitious mortar. Engineering Reports, 7(6), Article e70238. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.7023810.1002/eng2.70238 ↗
6. Bameri, M., Rashidi, S., Mohammadhasani, M., Maghsoudi, M., Madani, H., & Rahmani, F. (2022). Evaluation of mechanical and durability properties of eco-friendly concrete containing silica fume, waste glass powder, and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022(1), Article 2730391. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/273039110.1155/2022/2730391 ↗
7. Bassuoni, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2015). Response of concrete to accelerated physical salt attack exposure. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.006 ↗
8. Bogas, J. A., Gomes, M. G., & Gomes, A. (2013). Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Ultrasonics, 53(5), 962–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.01210.1016/j.ultras.2012.12.012 ↗
9. Bu, Y., Gong L., Jin, C., Yang, T., Zhao, X., & Xu, T. (2025). Experimental study on the deterioration mechanism of sulfate erosion of desert sand-manufactured sand concrete under dry-wet cycling conditions. Presented at the 2024 6th International Conference on Hydraulic, Civil and Construction Engineering (HCCE 2024), Atlantis Press, pp. 585–593. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-726-7_5810.2991/978-94-6463-726-7_58 ↗
10. Bulatović, V. (2022). External sulfate attack on concrete. Knowledge for Resilent Society KFORCE, 1–13
11. Bungey, J. H., & Grantham, M. G. (2006). Ultrasonic pulse velocity methods. In Testing of Concrete in Structures, 4th ed., CRC Press.10.1201/9781482264685 ↗
12. Chen, F., Gao, J., Qi, B., & Shen, D. (2017). Deterioration mechanism of plain and blended cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 849–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.017 ↗
13. Chen, G., & Jiang, C. (2025). Carbon nanomaterial-modified cement for resistance against sulfate and chloride attacks in harsh environments. Microchemical Journal, 217, Article 114902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2025.11490210.1016/j.microc.2025.114902 ↗
14. Diab, A. M., Elyamany, H. E., Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M., & Shalan, A. H. (2014). Prediction of concrete compressive strength due to long term sulfate attack using neural network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53(3), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2014.04.00210.1016/j.aej.2014.04.002 ↗
15. Ehwailat, K. I. A., Ismail, M. A. M., & Ezreig, A. M. A. (2022). Ettringite formation and stabilization methods of sulfate-bearing soil: A state-of-the-art review. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 52(4), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00619-x10.1007/s40098-022-00619-x ↗
16. Galobardes, I., Salvador, R., Cavalaro, S., Figueiredo, A., & Goodier, C. (2016). Adaptation of the standard EN 196-1 for mortar with accelerator. Construction and Building Materials, 127, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.14710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.147 ↗
17. Gospodinov, P., Kazandjiev, R., & Mironova, M. (1996). The effect of sulfate ion diffusion on the structure of cement stone. Cement and Concrete Composites, 18(6), 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(96)00032-710.1016/S0958-9465(96)00032-7 ↗
18. Hou, W., et al. (2022). Calcium transfer process of cement paste for ettringite formation under different sulfate concentrations. Construction and Building Materials, 348, Article 128706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12870610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128706 ↗
19. Hydration Characteristics of Cement Paste Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials | Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. Accessed: Sep. 08, 2025. [Online] Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13369-012-0193-6?utm_source=chatgpt.com
20. Jo, B. W., Sikandar, M. A., Chakraborty, S., & Baloch, Z. (2017). Strength and durability assessment of Portland cement mortars formulated from hydrogen-rich water. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017(1), Article 2526130. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/252613010.1155/2017/2526130 ↗
21. Liu, C., Gao, J., Chen, F., Zhao, Y., Chen, X., & He, Z. (2019). Coupled effect of relative humidity and temperature on the degradation of cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.001 ↗
22. Liu, P., Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Chen, L., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Research on sulfate attack mechanism of cement concrete based on chemical thermodynamics. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020(1), Article 6916039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/691603910.1155/2020/6916039 ↗
23. López-Uceda, A., Cantador-Fernández, D., Da Silva, P. R., de Brito, J., Fernández-Rodríguez, J. M., & Jiménez, J. R. (2024). Mechanical and durability performance of self-compacting mortars made with different industrial by-products as fillers. Construction and Building Materials, 431, Article 136536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13653610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136536 ↗
24. Luo, D., Li, F., & Niu, D. (2024). Study on the deterioration of concrete performance in saline soil area under the combined effect of high low temperatures, chloride and sulfate salts. Cement and Concrete Composites, 150, Article 105531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10553110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105531 ↗
25. Lv, Y., Zhang, W., Wu, F., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Xu, G. (2020). Influence of initial damage degree on the degradation of concrete under sulfate attack and wetting–drying cycles. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 14(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00422-z10.1186/s40069-020-00422-z ↗
26. Mohan, A., & Mini, K. M. (2018). Strength and durability studies of SCC incorporating silica fume and ultra fine GGBS. Construction and Building Materials, 171, 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.18610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.186 ↗
27. Naik, N. N., Jupe, A. C., Stock, S. R., Wilkinson, A. P., Lee, P. L., & Kurtis, K. E. (2006). Sulfate attack monitored by microCT and EDXRD: Influence of cement type, water-to-cement ratio, and aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(1), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.004 ↗
28. Neville, A. (2004). The confused world of sulfate attack on concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(8), 1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.004 ↗
29. Paparella, F., & Burt, J. A. (2024). Climate of the United Arab Emirates: Present, Past and Impacts on Life. In J. A. Burt (Ed.), A Natural History of the Emirates (pp. 65–94). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37397-8_310.1007/978-3-031-37397-8_3 ↗
30. Paruthi, S., Rahman, I., Khan, A. H., Sharma, N., & Alyaseen, A. (2024). Strength, durability, and economic analysis of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete with silica fume under harsh conditions. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 31572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77801-z10.1038/s41598-024-77801-z ↗
31. Physical salt attack on concrete: field case study and innovative mitigations. Accessed: Sep. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/items/e1e56e6a-2209-4b32-9de1-5cc5e7906dee
32. Qin, S., Chen, C., & Zhang, M. (2024). Modeling of concrete deterioration under external sulfate attack and drying–wetting cycles: A review. Materials, 17(13), Article 3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1713333410.3390/ma17133334 ↗
33. Raghav, M., Park, T., Yang, H.-M., Lee, S.-Y., Karthick, S., & Lee, H.-S. (2021). Review of the effects of supplementary cementitious materials and chemical additives on the physical, mechanical and durability properties of hydraulic concrete. Materials, 14(23), Article 7270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1423727010.3390/ma14237270 ↗
34. Rajković, M., & Tošković, D. V. (2003). Phosphogypsum surface characterisation using scanning electron microscopy. Acta Periodica Technologica, 34, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.2298/APT0334061R10.2298/APT0334061R ↗
35. Rasheed, Q., Sikandar, M. A., Khan, M. H., Akash, K., Nasir, H., & Khan, B. J. (2021). Assessment of chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion protection of modified sulfur polymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 268, Article 121086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12108610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121086 ↗
36. Rashidi, S., Madani, H., Maghsoudi, M., Bameri, M., & Afzali, M. (2024). Multiscale assessment of microstructural features effects on mechanical and transport properties of Ferro-silicomanganese/GGBFS-based alkali-activated composites. Journal of Building Engineering, 88, Article 109207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10920710.1016/j.jobe.2024.109207 ↗
37. Rashidi, S., Maghsoudi, M., Manouchehri, M., Bameri, M., Siad, H., & Lachemi, M. (2025). The importance of using silica fume and pumice powder in cement-based fiber composites, with a focus on microstructural and mechanical assessments. Structures, 81, Article 110270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.11027010.1016/j.istruc.2025.110270 ↗
38. Ribeiro, D., Labrincha, J. A., & Morelli, M. (2010). Use of red mud as addition for Portland cement mortars. Journal of material Science and Engineering, 4
39. Samson, E., & Marchand, J. (2007). Modeling the transport of ions in unsaturated cement-based materials. Computers & Structures, 85(23), 1740–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.00810.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.008 ↗
40. Selen, V., et al. (2023). Physical-mechanical and electrical resistivity properties of cementitious mortars containing Fe3O4-MWCNTs nanocomposite. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 11045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15141104510.3390/su151411045 ↗
41. Sherief, M. M., Shittu, R. A., AlHamadi, F. , AlKaabi, A., & AlFantazi, A. (2025). Synergic effects of corrosive ions on concrete and nano additives situated in nuclear power plants in arid climatic conditions. In: Int. Conf. Civ. Struct. Transp. Eng., Avestia Publishing. https://doi.org/10.11159/iccste25.29410.11159/iccste25.294 ↗
42. Shittu, R. A., Sherief, M., Alhamadi, F., Alfantazi, A., & Alkaabi, A. (2025). Sulfate-Induced Degradation in Concrete Exposed To Thermal Gradient. In: Int. Conf. Civ. Struct. Transp. Eng., Avestia Publishing. https://doi.org/10.11159/iccste25.25710.11159/iccste25.257 ↗
43. Shittu, R. A., AlFantazi, A., Alkaabi, A. K., & Kim, T.-Y. (2025b). Effect of blending silica fume and GGBS on chloride penetration in concrete under temperature gradient conditions. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 19(1), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-025-00796-y10.1186/s40069-025-00796-y ↗
44. Shittu, R. A., Sherief, M., Alhamadi, F., AlFantazi, A., & Alkaabi, A. K. (2025a). Investigation of binary blended cement mortar degradation driven by sulfate attack and thermal gradients in arid environments. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 41916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25798-410.1038/s41598-025-25798-4 ↗
45. Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory. Accessed: Jul. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://store.astm.org/c0192_c0192m-25.html
46. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens). Accessed: Jul. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://store.astm.org/c0109_c0109m-20.html
47. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. Accessed: Jul. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://store.astm.org/c0348-21.html
48. Wang, L., Wu, C., Li, K., Han, Y., & Yang, R. (2025a). A reactive transport model for concrete exposed to cyclic wetting/drying: Salt crystallization, carbonation, leaching, and beyond. Transport in Porous Media, 152(5), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-025-02175-310.1007/s11242-025-02175-3 ↗
49. Wang, R., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Zhuang, X. (2025b). Performance degradation mechanism and strength prediction of silica fume concrete under sulfate dry–wet cycles. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 23, Article e05163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0516310.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05163 ↗
50. Whittaker, M., & Black, L. (2015). Current knowledge of external sulfate attack. Advances in Cement Research, 27, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.14.0008910.1680/adcr.14.00089 ↗
51. Wu, Q., Ma, Q., & Huang, X. (2021). Mechanical properties and damage evolution of concrete materials considering sulfate attack. Materials, 14(9), Article 2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1409234310.3390/ma14092343 ↗
52. Han, Y. (1991) Understanding Pozzolanic reactivity: dissolution kinetics of silica fume and portlandite,” May 2025, Accessed: Jan. 19, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/items/ed4a6b8c-35d5-4bad-9099-3aeb97d88119
53. Yao, J., Song, H., & Chen, J. (2023). Effect of temperature on damage of mortars with different supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) under sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials, 394, Article 132183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13218310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132183 ↗
54. Yin, G.-J., Wen, X.-D., Miao, L., Cui, D., Zuo, X.-B., & Tang, Y.-J. (2023). A review on the transport-chemo-mechanical behavior in concrete under external sulfate attack. Coatings, 13(1), Article 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1301017410.3390/coatings13010174 ↗
55. Yin, G.-J., Zuo, X.-B., Sun, X.-H., & Tang, Y.-J. (2019). Macro-microscopically numerical analysis on expansion response of hardened cement paste under external sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials, 207, 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.15910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.159 ↗
56. Yoshida, N. (2019). Sulfate attack on residential concrete foundations in Japan. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 8(6), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2018.153701410.1080/21650373.2018.1537014 ↗
57. Zeidan, M., Bassuoni, M. T., & Said, A. (2017). Physical salt attack on concrete incorporating nano-silica. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 6(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2016.121880210.1080/21650373.2016.1218802 ↗
58. Zhang, C., Li, J., Yu, M., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2024a). Mechanism and performance control methods of sulfate attack on concrete: A review. Materials, 17(19), Article 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1719483610.3390/ma17194836 ↗
59. Zhang, M., Gu, Z., Zhao, Y., Fu, Y., & Kong, X. (2024b). Compressive strength prediction of cement base under sulfate attack by machine learning approach. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 21, Article e03652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0365210.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03652 ↗
60. Zhang, Z., Jin, X., & Luo, W. (2019). Long-term behaviors of concrete under low-concentration sulfate attack subjected to natural variation of environmental climate conditions. Cement and Concrete Research, 116, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.017 ↗
61. Zou, D., Qin, S., Liu, T., & Jivkov, A. (2021). Experimental and numerical study of the effects of solution concentration and temperature on concrete under external sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 139, Article 106284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10628410.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106284 ↗