Prediction of RC T-Beams Shear Strength Based on Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The contribution of shear resisted by flanges of T-beams is usually ignored in the shear design models even though it was proven by many experimental studies that the shear strength of T-beams is higher than that of equivalent rectangular cross-sections. Ignoring such a contribution result in a very conservative and uneconomical design. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the capability of machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the shear capacity of reinforced concrete T-beams (RCTBs) by incorporating the contribution of the flange. Five machine learning (ML) techniques, which are the Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), are trained and tested using 360 sets of data collected from experimental studies. Among the various machine learning models evaluated, the XGBoost model demonstrated exceptional reliability and precision, achieving an R-squared value of 99.10%. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach is utilized to identify the most influential input features affecting the predicted shear capacity of RCTBs. The SHAP results indicate that the shear span-to-depth ratio (a/d) has the most significant effect on the shear capacity of RCTBs, followed by the ratio of shear reinforcement multiplied by the yield strength of shear reinforcement ($${\rho }_{{\text{v}}}{f}_{{\text{yv}}}$$), flange thickness ($${h}_{{\text{f}}}$$), and flange width ($${b}_{{\text{f}}}$$). The accuracy of the XGBoost model in predicting the shear capacity of RCTBs is compared with established codes of practice (ACI 318-19, BS 8110-1:1997, EN 1992-1-2, CSA23.3-04) and existing formulas from researchers. This comparison reinforces the superior reliability and accuracy of the machine learning approach compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, a user-friendly interface platform is developed, effectively simplifying the implementation of the proposed machine-learning model. The reliability analysis is performed to determine the value of the resistance reduction factor (ϕ) that will achieve a target reliability index ($${\beta }T$$= 3.5).
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Dam Engineering and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Abambres, M., & Lantsoght, E. O. L. (2019). ANN-based shear capacity of steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams without stirrups. Fibers, 7(10), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/FIB710008810.3390/FIB7100088 ↗
2. Abd, R. T. (2019). Prediction of the shear strength of concrete T-beams using artificial neural networks model. University of Thi_qar Journal for Engineering Sciences, 10(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.3166/tqujes.10.1.354(2019)10.3166/tqujes.10.1.354(2019) ↗
3. ACI Committee 318. (2014). American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14): an ACI standard : commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R-14). An ACI Report.
4. ACI 318–19. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.
5. Alshboul, O., Almasabha, G., Shehadeh, A., Mamlook, R. E. A., Almuflih, A. S., & Almakayeel, N. (2022). Machine learning-based model for predicting the shear strength of slender reinforced concrete beams without stirrups. Buildings, 12(8), 1166.10.3390/buildings12081166 ↗
6. Amna, H. A., & Monstaser, W. M. (2019). Shear behaviour of reinforced lightweight concrete T-beams. Life Sci J, 16(8), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj160819.0210.7537/marslsj160819.02 ↗
7. Ashour, A. F., Alvarez, L. F., & Toropov, V. V. (2003). Empirical modelling of shear strength of RC deep beams by genetic programming. Computers & Structures, 81(5), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00437-610.1016/S0045-7949(02)00437-6 ↗
8. Ayensa, A., Oller, E., Beltrán, B., Ibarz, E., Marí, A., & Gracia, L. (2019). Influence of the flange’s width and thickness on the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with T-shaped cross section. Engineering Structures, 188, 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2019.03.05710.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2019.03.057 ↗
9. Bairan Garcia, J. M., & Mari Bernat, A. R. (2006). Coupled model for the non-linear analysis of anisotropic sections subjected to general 3D loading. Part 1: theoretical formulation. Computers & Structures, 84(31–32), 2254–2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2006.08.03610.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2006.08.036 ↗
10. Bousselham, A., & Chaallal, O. (2006). Behavior of reinforced concrete T-beams strengthened in shear with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer-an experimental study. ACI Structural Journal, 103(3), 339.
11. Braestrup, M. W., Nielson, M. P., Bach, F., & Jensen, B. C. (1976). Shear tests on reinforced concrete T-beams: series T. Technical University of Denmark.
12. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
13. Bresler, B., & MacGregor, J. G. (1967). Review of concrete beams failing in shear. Journal of the Structural Division, 93(1), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.000158610.1061/JSDEAG.0001586 ↗
14. BS 8110–1:1997. (1997). British Standard. “Structural Use of Concrete, Part 2: Code of practice for design and construction”, British Standard Institution, London.
15. Chaabene, W. B., & Nehdi, M. L. (2020). Novel soft computing hybrid model for predicting shear strength and failure mode of SFRC beams with superior accuracy. Composites Part C: Open Access, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOMC.2020.10007010.1016/J.JCOMC.2020.100070 ↗
16. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 13–17-August-2016, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.293978510.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
17. Cladera, A., & Marí, A. R. (2004). Shear design procedure for reinforced normal and high-strength concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Part I: beams without stirrups. Engineering Structures, 26(7), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2004.02.01010.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2004.02.010 ↗
18. Cladera, A., Marí, A., Ribas, C., Bairán, J., & Oller, E. (2015). Predicting the shear–flexural strength of slender reinforced concrete T and I shaped beams. Engineering Structures, 101, 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2015.07.02510.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2015.07.025 ↗
19. CSA23.3–04. (2004). Design of concrete structures. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
20. Elgohary, A., Abdelhafiez, A., & Asran, A. (2019). Effect of flange width on shear strength of RC T-beams. Journal of Al Azhar University Engineering Sector, 14(52), 875–882.10.21608/auej.2019.43430 ↗
21. Eurocode2. (2004). Europian Committee for Standarization. “Design of concrete structures - Part 1–2”. Brussels,.
22. Ferguson, P. M., & Thompson, J. N. (1953). Diagonal tension in T-bemas without stirrups. Journal Proceedings, 49(3), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1435/1184410.1435/11844 ↗
23. Bach, F., Nielsen, M. P., & Bræstrup, M. W. (1980). Shear tests on reinforced concrete T-beams series V, U, X, B and S. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Civil Engineering.
24. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
25. Giaccio, C., Al-Mahaidi, R., & Taplin, G. (2011). Experimental study on the effect of flange geometry on the shear strength of reinforced concrete T-beams subjected to concentrated loads. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(6), 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1139/L02-09910.1139/L02-099 ↗
26. Goh, A. T. C. (1995). Prediction of ultimate shear strength of deep beams using neural networks. Structural Journal, 92(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1435/147010.1435/1470 ↗
27. Hans Christian. (1974). Shear Tests on 12 Reinforced Concrete T-Beams. Technical University of Denmark Department of Civil Engineering.
28. Hawileh, R. A., Mhanna, H. H., & Abdalla, J. A. (2022). Effect of flange geometry on the shear capacity of RC T-beams. Procedia Structural Integrity, 42, 1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSTR.2022.12.15310.1016/J.PROSTR.2022.12.153 ↗
29. Huynh, T. Q., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, H. (2022). Base resistance of super-large and long piles in soft soil: performance of artificial neural network model and field implications. Acta Geotechnica. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11440-022-01736-w10.1007/S11440-022-01736-w ↗
30. Jiang, C. S., & Liang, G. Q. (2021). Modeling shear strength of medium- to ultra-high-strength concrete beams with stirrups using SVR and genetic algorithm. Soft Computing, 25(16), 10661–10675. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00500-021-06027-2/METRICS10.1007/S00500-021-06027-2/METRICS ↗
31. Jung, S., & Kim, K. S. (2008). Knowledge-based prediction of shear strength of concrete beams without shear reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 30(6), 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2007.10.00810.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2007.10.008 ↗
32. Kadr, A., Asst, K., Abdul, J., & Khudhair, S. (2019). Experimental study of the shear strength of self compacting concrete T-beams made with recycled concrete as coarse aggregate. University of Thi-Qar Journal, 14(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.3279/utq/utj/vol14/1/410.3279/utq/utj/vol14/1/4 ↗
33. Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, & Wang T. (2017). LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 3149–3157.
34. Keshtegar, B., Bagheri, M., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2019). Shear strength of steel fiber-unconfined reinforced concrete beam simulation: application of novel intelligent model. Composite Structures, 212, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.01.00410.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.01.004 ↗
35. Kotsovos, M. D., Bobrowski, J., & Eibl, J. (1987). Behaviour of reinforced concrete T-beams in shear. Structural (The) Engineer. Part b: the Journal of the Institution of Structural Engineers-Quarterly, 65(1), 1–10.
36. Kotsovou, G. M., & Cotsovos, D. M. (2018). Shear failure criterion for RC T-beams. Engineering Structures, 160, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2017.12.04410.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2017.12.044 ↗
37. Le-Nguyen, K., Minh, Q. C., Ahmad, A., & Ho, L. S. (2022). Development of deep neural network model to predict the compressive strength of FRCM confined columns. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 16(10), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11709-022-0880-7/METRICS10.1007/S11709-022-0880-7/METRICS ↗
38. Leonhardt F, & Walther R. (1962). Schubversuche an Einfeldringen Stahlbetonbalken mit und ohne Schubbewehrung zur Ermittlung der Schubtragfähigkeit und der Oberen Schubspannungsgrenze. Heft 151, Deutcher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton. Berlin:W. Ernst & Sohn, 68P.
39. Mhanna, H. H., Hawileh, R. A., & Abdalla, J. A. (2020). Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete T-beams using CFRP laminates anchored with bent CFRP splay anchors. Procedia Structural Integrity, 28, 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSTR.2020.10.09510.1016/J.PROSTR.2020.10.095 ↗
40. Mhanna, H. H., Hawileh, R. A., & Abdalla, J. A. (2021a). Shear behavior of RC T-beams externally strengthened with anchored high modulus carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates. Composite Structures, 272, 114198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.11419810.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.114198 ↗
41. Mhanna, H. H., Hawileh, R. A., Abdalla, J. A., Salama, A. S. D., & Alkhrdaji, T. (2021b). Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete T-beams with anchored CFRP laminates. Journal of Composites for Construction, 25(4), 04021030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000114110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001141 ↗
42. Moayer, M., & Regan, P. E. (1974). Shear strength of prestressed and reinforced concrete T-beams. Special Publication, 42, 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1435/1728410.1435/17284 ↗
43. Nguyen, H. D., LaFave, J. M., Lee, Y. J., & Shin, M. (2022). Rapid seismic damage-state assessment of steel moment frames using machine learning. Engineering Structures, 252, 113737. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.11373710.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.113737 ↗
44. Nguyen, H. D., Truong, G. T., & Shin, M. (2021a). Development of extreme gradient boosting model for prediction of punching shear resistance of r/c interior slabs. Engineering Structures, 235, 112067. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.11206710.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2021.112067 ↗
45. Nguyen, H., Vu, T., Vo, T. P., & Thai, H. T. (2021b). Efficient machine learning models for prediction of concrete strengths. Construction and Building Materials, 266, 120950. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.12095010.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.120950 ↗
46. Nguyen-Sy, T., Wakim, J., To, Q. D., Vu, M. N., Nguyen, T. D., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Predicting the compressive strength of concrete from its compositions and age using the extreme gradient boosting method. Construction and Building Materials, 260, 119757. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.11975710.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.119757 ↗
47. Ni, X., & Duan, K. (2022). Machine learning-based models for shear strength prediction of UHPFRC beams. Mathematics, 10(16), 2918.10.3390/math10162918 ↗
48. Palaskas, M. N., Attiogbe, E. K., & Darwin, D. (1981). Shear strength of lightly reinforced T-beams. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 78(6), 447–455.
49. Pansuk, W., Ueda, T., & Takahashi, R. (2004). Investigation on shear capacity of reinforced concrete T-Beams using 3d nonlinear finite element analysis. JSCE, 50A(3), 991–998.
50. Placas, A., Regan, P. E., & Baker, A. L. L. (1971). Shear failure of reinforced concrete beams. ACI Journal, 68(10), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1435/1523710.1435/15237 ↗
51. Rahman, J., Ahmed, K. S., Khan, N. I., Islam, K., & Mangalathu, S. (2021). Data-driven shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using machine learning approach. Engineering Structures, 233, 111743. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.11174310.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.111743 ↗
52. Ramadan, O. M., Abdel-Kareem, A. H., El-Azab, I. A., & Abousafa, H. R. (2022). Flange contribution to the shear strength of RC T-beams with flange in compression. Buildings, 12(6), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS1206080310.3390/BUILDINGS12060803 ↗
53. Ribas González, C. R., Fernández Ruiz, M., Rodrigo, C., & González, R. (2017). Influence of flanges on the shear-carrying capacity of reinforced concrete beams without web reinforcement. Structural Concrete, 18(5), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/SUCO.20160017210.1002/SUCO.201600172 ↗
54. Sahoo, D. R., Bhagat, S., & Reddy, T. C. V. (2016). Experimental study on shear-span to effective-depth ratio of steel fiber reinforced concrete T-beams. Materials and Structures, 49(9), 3815–3830. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-015-0756-6/TABLES/510.1617/S11527-015-0756-6/TABLES/5 ↗
55. Samad, A. A. A., Mohamad, N., Al-Qershi, M. A. H., Jayaprakash, J., & Mendis, P. (2016). Shear mechanism and shear strength prediction of reinforced concrete Tbeams. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5), 471–476.
56. Sarsam, K., Khalel, R., & Mohammed, N. (2018). Influence of flange on the shear capacity of reinforced concrete beams. MATEC Web of Conferences, 162, 04003. https://doi.org/10.1051/MATECCONF/20181620400310.1051/MATECCONF/201816204003 ↗
57. Sarveghadi, M., Gandomi, A. H., Bolandi, H., & Alavi, A. H. (2019). Development of prediction models for shear strength of SFRCB using a machine learning approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(7), 2085–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00521-015-1997-6/METRICS10.1007/S00521-015-1997-6/METRICS ↗
58. Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019). Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. NPJ Computational Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41524-019-0221-010.1038/S41524-019-0221-0 ↗
59. Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.000000000000286410.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
60. Shahin, R. I., Ahmed, M., Yehia, S. A., & Liang, Q. Q. (2023). ANN model for predicting the elastic critical buckling coefficients of prismatic tapered steel web plates under stress gradients. Engineering Structures, 294, 116794. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2023.11679410.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2023.116794 ↗
61. Shahnewaz, M., & Alam, M. S. (2020). Genetic algorithm for predicting shear strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete beam with parameter identification and sensitivity analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2020.10120510.1016/J.JOBE.2020.101205 ↗
62. Shatnawi, A., Alkassar, H. M., Al-Abdaly, N. M., Al-Hamdany, E. A., Bernardo, L. F. A., & Imran, H. (2022). Shear strength prediction of slender steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using a gradient boosting regression tree method. Buildings, 12(5), 550.10.3390/buildings12050550 ↗
63. Solhmirzaei, R., Salehi, H., Kodur, V., & Naser, M. Z. (2020). Machine learning framework for predicting failure mode and shear capacity of ultra- high performance concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 224, 111221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.11122110.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.111221 ↗
64. Sutton, C. D. (2005). Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting. Handbook of statistics. , 24:303–329.
65. Swamy, R. N., & Qureshi, S. A. (2015). Shear behaviour of reinforced concrete t beams with web reinforcement. University of Melbourne, 57(Part 2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1680/IICEP.1974.409710.1680/IICEP.1974.4097 ↗
66. Swamy, R. N., Qureshi, S. A., Eng, C., Struct, M. I., Eng, B., & Eng, M. (1974). An ultimate shear strength theory for reinforced concrete T-beams without web reinforcement. Matériaux Et Construction, 7(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0247383310.1007/BF02473833 ↗
67. Szerszen, M. M., & Nowak, A. S. (2003). Calibration of design code for buildings (ACI 318): part 2—reliability analysis and resistance factors. Structural Journal, 100(3), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1435/1261410.1435/12614 ↗
68. Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D7), 7183–7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD90071910.1029/2000JD900719 ↗
69. Thai, H. T. (2022). Machine learning for structural engineering: a state-of-the-art review. Structures, 38, 448–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2022.02.00310.1016/J.ISTRUC.2022.02.003 ↗
70. Thamrin, R., Tanjung, J., Aryanti, R., Fitrah Nur, O., & Devinus, A. (2016). Shear strength of reinforced concrete t-beams without stirrups. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 11(4), 548–562.
71. Tureyen, A. K., & Frosch, R. J. (2003). Concrete shear strength: another perspective. Structural Journal, 100(5), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1435/1280210.1435/12802 ↗
72. Vadyala, S. R., Betgeri, S. N., Matthews, J. C., & Matthews, E. (2022). A review of physics-based machine learning in civil engineering. Results in Engineering, 13, 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINENG.2021.10031610.1016/J.RINENG.2021.100316 ↗
73. Wakjira, T. G., Ibrahim, M., Ebead, U., & Alam, M. S. (2022). Explainable machine learning model and reliability analysis for flexural capacity prediction of RC beams strengthened in flexure with FRCM. Engineering Structures, 255, 113903. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2022.11390310.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2022.113903 ↗
74. Wang, A. Y. T., Murdock, R. J., Kauwe, S. K., Oliynyk, A. O., Gurlo, A., Brgoch, J., Persson, K. A., & Sparks, T. D. (2020). Machine learning for materials scientists: an introductory guide toward best practices. Chemistry of Materials, 32(12), 4954–4965. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.0C01907/SUPPL_FILE/CM0C01907_SI_001.PDF10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.0C01907/SUPPL_FILE/CM0C01907_SI_001.PDF ↗
75. Wehr, K. E. (1967). Shear strength of reinforced concrete T-beams. Lafayette: Research Report No.4 on Joint Research Highway Project, Purdue University.10.5703/1288284314473 ↗
76. Wei, J., et al. (2019). Machine learning in materials science. Infomat, 1(3), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/Inf2.1202810.1002/Inf2.12028 ↗
77. Wight, J. K. (2016). Reinforced concrete mechanics and design (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
78. Wolf, T. S., & Frosch, R. J. (2007). Shear design of prestressed concrete: a unified approach. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(11), 1512–1519. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1512)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1512) ↗
79. Yaseen, Z. M., Tran, M. T., Kim, S., Bakhshpoori, T., & Deo, R. C. (2018). Shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beam using hybrid intelligence models: a new approach. Engineering Structures, 177, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2018.09.07410.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2018.09.074 ↗
80. Ye, M., Li, L., Yoo, D. Y., Li, H., Zhou, C., & Shao, X. (2023). Prediction of shear strength in UHPC beams using machine learning-based models and SHAP interpretation. Construction and Building Materials, 408, 133752. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.13375210.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.133752 ↗
81. Yehia, S. A. (2024). GUI of XGBoost-model. https://huggingface.co/spaces/saad-yehia/xgboost-model
82. Zararis, I. P., Karaveziroglou, M. K., & Zararis, P. D. (2006). Shear strength of reinforced concrete T-beams. ACI Structural Journal, 103, 693–700.
83. Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Li, G., Wang, Y., Sun, J., & Li, J. (2022). Machine-learning-assisted shear strength prediction of reinforced concrete beams with and without stirrups. Engineering with Computers, 38(2), 1293–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00366-020-01076-X/FIGURES/1210.1007/S00366-020-01076-X/FIGURES/12 ↗