Anchorage Effects of Various Steel Fibre Architectures for Concrete Reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper studies the effects of steel fibre geometry and architecture on the cracking behaviour of steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC), with the reinforcements being four types, namely 5DH (Dramix ® hooked-end), 4DH, 3DH-60 and 3DH-35, of various hooked-end steel fibres at the fibre dosage of 40 and 80 kg/m 3 . The test results show that the addition of steel fibres have little effect on the workability and compressive strength of SFRC, but the ultimate tensile loads, post-cracking behaviour, residual strength and the fracture energy of SFRC are closely related to the shapes of fibres which all increased with increasing fibre content. Results also revealed that the residual tensile strength is significantly influenced by the anchorage strength rather than the number of the fibres counted on the fracture surface. The 5DH steel fibre reinforced concretes have behaved in a manner of multiple crackings and more ductile compared to 3DH and 4DH ones, and the end-hooks of 4DH and 5DH fibres partially deformed in steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete (SFR–SCC). In practice, 5DH fibres should be used for reinforcing high or ultra-high performance matrixes to fully utilize their high mechanical anchorage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Abrishambaf, A., Barros, J. A. O., & Cunha, V. M. C. F. (2013). Relation between fibre distribution and post-cracking behaviour in steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete panels. Cement and Concrete Research, 51, 57–66.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.009 ↗
2. Astm, C. (1994). 1018, Standard test method for flexural toughness and first crack strength of fibre reinforced concrete (Using beam with third-point loading). American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, Annual Book of Standard, 4. 02, pp. 509–516.
3. Banthia, N., & Trottier, J. (1991). Deformed steel fiber—cementitious matrix bond under impact. Cement and Concrete Research, 21(1), 158–168.10.1016/0008-8846(91)90042-G ↗
4. Bencardino, F. (2013). Mechanical parameters and post-cracking behaviour of HPFRC according to three-point and four-point bending test. Advances in Civil Engineering.10.1155/2013/179712 ↗
5. Beygi, M. H. A., Kazemi, M. T., Nikbin, I. M., & Amiri, J. V. (2013). The effect of water to cement ratio on fracture parameters and brittleness of self-compacting concrete. Materials and Design, 50, 267–276.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.018 ↗
6. CNR, D. 204/2006. (2006). Guidelines for the design, construction and production control of fibre reinforced concrete structures. National Research Council of Italy, pp. 59.
7. Ding, Y. (2011). Investigations into the relationship between deflection and crack mouth opening displacement of SFRC beam. Construction and Building Materials, 25(5), 2432–2440.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.055 ↗
8. El-Mal, H. A., Sherbini, A., & Sallam, H. (2015). Mode II fracture toughness of hybrid FRCs. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(4), 475–486.10.1007/s40069-015-0117-4 ↗
9. EN, B. 12350-8: 2010 Testing fresh concrete, Self-compacting concrete. Slump-flow test.
10. EN, B. (2007). 14651: 2005 A1: 2007, Test method for metallic fibre concrete. Measuring the flexural tensile strength (limit of proportionality (LOP), residual), pp. 1–20.
11. Ferrara, L., Bamonte, P., Caverzan, A., Musa, A., & Sanal, I. (2012). A comprehensive methodology to test the performance of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete (SFR-SCC). Construction and Building Materials, 37, 406–424.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.057 ↗
12. Ferrara, L., & Meda, A. (2006). Relationships between fibre distribution, workability and the mechanical properties of SFRC applied to precast roof elements. Materials and Structures, 39(4), 411–420.10.1617/s11527-005-9017-4 ↗
13. Giaccio, G., Tobes, J. M., & Zerbino, R. (2008). Use of small beams to obtain design parameters of fibre reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 30(4), 297–306.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.10.004 ↗
14. Gopalaratnam, V. S., & Gettu, R. (1995). On the characterization of flexural toughness in fiber reinforced concretes. Cement and Concrete Composites, 17(3), 239–254.10.1016/0958-9465(95)99506-O ↗
15. Islam, M. S., & Alam, S. (2013). Principal component and multiple regression analysis for steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) beams. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7(4), 303–317.10.1007/s40069-013-0059-7 ↗
16. JSCE-SF4 III, P. (1984). Method of tests for steel fiber reinforced concrete. Japan: The Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Concrete Library of JSCE.
17. Kooiman, A.G. (2000). Modelling steel fibre reinforced concrete for structural design.
18. Laranjeira de Oliveira, F. (2010). Design-oriented constitutive model for steel fiber reinforced concrete. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
19. Li, H., & Liu, G. (2016). Tensile properties of hybrid fiber-reinforced reactive powder concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10, 1–9.10.1007/s40069-016-0126-y ↗
20. Naaman, A. E. (1972). A statistical theory of strength for fiber reinforced concrete.
21. Ozyurt, N., Mason, T. O., & Shah, S. P. (2007). Correlation of fiber dispersion, rheology and mechanical performance of FRCs. Cement & Concrete Composites, 29(2), 70–79.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.08.006 ↗
22. Pająk, M., & Ponikiewski, T. (2013). Flexural behavior of self-compacting concrete reinforced with different types of steel fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 397–408.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.072 ↗
23. Rilem, T. (1985). Determination of the Fracture Energy of Mortar and Concrete by Means of Three-point Bend Tests on Notched Beams, pp. 285–290.
24. RILEM, T. (2001). 162 TDF: Design of steelfibre reinforced concrete–method, Recommendations. Material and Structures.
25. Romualdi, J. P., Ramey, M., & Sanday, S. C. (1968). Prevention and control of cracking by use of short random fibers. Special Publication, 20, 179–204.
26. Şanal, İ., & Özyurt Zihnioğlu, N. (2013). To what extent does the fiber orientation affect mechanical performance? Construction and Building Materials, 44, 671–681.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.079 ↗
27. Sorensen, C., Berge, E., & Nikolaisen, E. B. (2014). Investigation of fiber distribution in concrete batches discharged from ready-mix truck. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8(4), 279–287.10.1007/s40069-014-0083-2 ↗
28. Soroushian, P., & Lee, C. (1990). Distribution and orientation of fibers in steel fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 87(5), 433–439.
29. Srikar, G., Anand, G., & Prakash, S. S. (2016). A study on residual compression behavior of structural fiber reinforced concrete exposed to moderate temperature using digital image correlation. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10, 1–11.10.1007/s40069-016-0127-x ↗
30. Swamy, R. (1975). Fibre reinforcement of cement and concrete. Matériaux et Construction, 8(3), 235–254.10.1007/BF02475172 ↗
31. Tadepalli, P. R., Dhonde, H. B., Mo, Y., & Hsu, T. T. (2015). Shear strength of prestressed steel fiber concrete I-beams. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(3), 267–281.10.1007/s40069-015-0109-4 ↗
32. Vandewalle, L. (2000). RILEM TC 162-TDF: Test and design methods for steel fibre reinforced concrete. Materials and Structures, 33(225), 3–6.
33. Wecharatana, M. & Shah, S. (1983). Fracture toughness of fiber reinforced concrete.
34. Zhang, X. X., Abd Elazim, A. M., Ruiz, G., & Yu, R. C. (2014). Fracture behaviour of steel fibre-reinforced concrete at a wide range of loading rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 71, 89–96.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.04.009 ↗