High-Strength Reinforcing Steel Bars: Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior Using RGB Methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Low cycle fatigue life of high-strength reinforcing steel bars (ASTM A706 Grade 80), using photogrammetry by RGB methodology is evaluated. Fatigue tests are performed on specimens under constant axial displacement with total strain amplitudes ranging from 0.01 to 0.05. The experimental observations indicate that buckling of high-strength reinforcing bars results in a damaging degradation of their fatigue life performance as the slenderness ratio increases, including an early rebar failure as the total strain amplitude increases since it achieves the plastic range faster. In addition to this, the results show that the ratio of the ultimate tensile strength to yield strength satisfies the minimum of 1.25 specified in ASTM A706 for reinforcement. On the other hand, the RGB methodology indicates that the axial strains measured by photogrammetry provide more accurate data since the registered results by the traditional experimental setup do not detect second-order effects, such as slippage or lengthening of the specimens within the clamps. Moreover, the RGB filter is faster than digital image correlation (DIC) because the RGB methodology requires a fewer computational cost than DIC algorithms. The RGB methodology allows to reduce the total strain amplitude up to 45% compared to the results obtained by the traditional setup. Finally, models relating total strain amplitude with half-cycles to failure and total strain amplitude with total energy dissipated for multiple slenderness ratios (L/d of 5, 10, and 15) are obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2017). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (8th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. ACI. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–19) and Commentary (ACI 318R–19). Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3. ASTM. (2016). Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Low-Alloy Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM A706/A706M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
4. Barbosa, A., Trejo, D., Nielson, D., Mazerei, V. & Tibbits, C. (2017). High strength reinforcing steel bars: Low cycle fatigue behavior (Final Report - Part B). Oregon Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32013
5. Blaber, J., Adair, B., & Antoniou, A. (2015). Ncorr: Open-Source 2D Digital Image Correlation Matlab Software. Experimental Mechanics, 55, 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1.10.1007/s11340-015-0009-1 ↗
6. Brown, J., & Kunnath, S. (2004). Low-Cycle fatigue failure of reinforcing steel bars. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.14359/13484.10.14359/13484 ↗
7. Carpenter, L., Naeim, F., Lew, M., Youssef, N., Rojas, F., Saragoni, R., & Schachter, M. (2011). Performance of tall buildings in Viña del Mar in the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.672.10.1002/tal.672 ↗
8. DSLR Remote Pro (2017). Multi-Camera, version 1.9.5, reeze Systems Limited, Camberley, UK.
9. Elistratkin, M. Y., Lesovik, V. S., Zagorodnjuk, L. H., Pospelova, E. A., & Shatalova, S. V. (2018). IOP Conf. Series: New point of view on materials development. Materials Science and Engineering, 327, 032020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/327/3/032020.10.1088/1757-899X/327/3/032020 ↗
10. Fisher, J., Kulak, G., & Smith, I. (1998). A Fatigue Primer for Structural Engineers. National Steel Bridge Alliance, American Institute of Steel Construction. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/nsba/technical-documents/a-fatigure-primer-for-structural-engineers.pdf.
11. Ghannoum, W., & Slavin, C. (2016). Low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel reinforcing bars. ACI Materials Journal, 113(6), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689116.10.14359/51689116 ↗
12. Hu, M., Han, Q., Xu, K., & Du, X. (2019). Impact of corrosion on cyclic behaviors of ultra-high-strength reinforcing bars. Construction and Building Materials, 209, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.182.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.182 ↗
13. Koh, S., & Stephens, R. (1991). Mean stress effects on low cycle fatigue for a high strength steel. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 14(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00672.x.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00672.x ↗
14. López, J. (2019). Technical feasibility study of the use of welded reinforcing steel for reinforced concrete. Civil Engineer Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, University of Chile. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/170979
15. Mander, J., Panthaki, F., & Kasalanti, A. (1994). Low-cycle fatigue behaviour of reinforcing steel. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering ASCE, 6(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453).10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1994)6:4(453) ↗
16. Massone, L. (2013). Fundamental principles of the reinforced concrete design code changes in Chile following the Mw 8.8 earthquake in 2010. Engineering Structures, 56, 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.013 ↗
17. Massone, L., & Herrera, P. (2019). Experimental study of the residual fatigue life of reinforcement bars damaged by an earthquake. Materials and Structures, 52, 61. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1361-x.10.1617/s11527-019-1361-x ↗
18. MATLAB (2018). R2018b, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.
19. Naeim, F., Lew, M., Carpenter, L., Youssef, N., Rojas, F., Saragoni, R., & Schachter, M. (2011). Performance of tall buildings in Santiago, Chile during the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.675.10.1002/tal.675 ↗
20. NCh204. (2020). Acero - Barras laminadas en caliente para hormigón armado (Steel - Hot rolled bars for reinforced concrete). Chile: Instituto Nacional de Normalización - INN.
21. Pan, B., Qian, K., Xie, H., & Asundi, A. (2009). Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Measurement Science and Technology, 20(6), 062001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001.10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001 ↗
22. Rojas, F., Lew, M., & Naeim, F. (2010). An overview of building codes and standards in Chile at the time of the 27 February 2010 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19, 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.676.10.1002/tal.676 ↗
23. Rojas, F., Naeim, F., Lew, Marshall, Carpenter, L., Youssef, N., Saragoni, R., & Schachter, M. (2011). Performance of tall buildings in Concepción during the 27 February 2010 moment magnitude 8.8 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 20, 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.674.10.1002/tal.674 ↗
24. Selek, M. (2016). A New Autofocusing Method Based on Brightness and Contrast for Color Cameras. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 16(4), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.4316/AECE.2016.0400610.4316/AECE.2016.04006 ↗
25. Sokoli, D., Shekarch, W., Buenrostro, E., & Ghannoum, W. (2014). Advancing behavioral understanding and damage evaluation of concrete members using high-resolution digital image correlation data. Earthquakes and Structures, 7(5), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.609.10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.609 ↗
26. Sokoli, D., Hogsett, G., Limantono, A., Suselo, A., Al-Tarafany, D., Rodgers, S., & Ghannoum, W. (2019). Acceptable Elongations and Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance for High-Strength Reinforcing Bars (Final Report). The University of Texas at San Antonio, Charles Pankow Foundation. https://www.pankowfoundation.org/s/2019-08-CPF-Final-Report.pdf
27. Tripathi, M., Dhakal, R., Dashti, F., & Massone, L. (2018). Low-cycle fatigue behaviour of reinforcing bars including the effect of inelastic buckling. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.192.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.192 ↗
28. Wallace, J., Massone, L., Bonelli, P., Dragovich, J., Lagos, R., Lüders, C., & Moehle, J. (2012). Damage and Implications for Seismic Design of RC Structural Wall Buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 28(S1), S281–S299. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000047.10.1193/1.4000047 ↗
29. Wang, G., Ma, Y., Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2021). Experimental study and residual fatigue life assessment of corroded high-tensile steel wires using 3D scanning technology. Engineering Failure Analysis, 124, 105335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105335.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105335 ↗
30. Yang, H., Wu, Y., Pengcheng, M., & Chen, J. (2016). Improved Nonlinear Cyclic Stress-Strain Model for Reinforcing Bars Including Buckling Effect and Experimental Verification. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 16(1), 1640005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455416400058.10.1142/S0219455416400058 ↗