journal article·2026-07-15Open access

Characterization of Ancient Yemeni Qadhad Plaster: A Low-Permeability Lime–Pozzolan Material for Sustainable and Durable Conservation and Construction

M. A. Algorafi, Ahmed H. Alwathaf, Sarhan Al-Gawi, Abdulwahab M. Al-Nono

Abstract

Qadhad is a traditional Yemeni lime-based waterproof plaster used for centuries in cisterns, reservoirs, and roofs, yet its scientific characteristics have not been fully documented until now. This study presents the first comprehensive characterization of ancient Qadhad plasters collected from four archaeological sites across Yemen, to evaluate their physical, hydraulic, chemical, mineralogical, and microstructural properties and sustainability potential. Physical and hydraulic testing (density, porosity, permeability, and absorption), combined with XRF, XRD, and SEM–EDS analyses, confirmed that Qadhad is a hydraulic lime–pozzolan composite containing reactive silica and alumina from volcanic aggregates that form C-S-H, C-A-H, and C-N-H phases responsible for waterproofing and durability. The measured permeability values (6.55 × 10⁻ 9 –26.2 × 10⁻ 8 m/s) are significantly lower than those typically reported for plaster materials, confirming its superior hydraulic performance. The low porosity (19.6–25.0%) and dense microstructure further support its exceptional impermeability. Environmentally, Qadhad is sustainable, utilizing local materials, low firing temperatures (≈900 °C), and CO₂ reabsorption, resulting in a low-carbon balance. These findings establish Qadhad as a superior waterproof plaster and a sustainable material for heritage conservation and modern construction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Hygrothermal properties of building materials · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Gawi, S., Algorafi, M., Al-Nono, A., & Kulaib, M. (2025). The physical, hydraulic, and mineralogical characterization study of the traditional Qadhad material of the Cisterns of Aden. Journal of Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.20428/jst.v30i12.343610.20428/jst.v30i12.3436 ↗
2. Al-Radi, S., Barnes, R., Al-Nasiri, Y., & Hillenbrand, R. (1997). The ʿAmiriya in Radaʿ: The history and restoration of a sixteenth-century madrasa in the Yemen. Oxford University Press.
3. Borsoi, G., Silva, A. S., Menezes, P., Candeias, A., & Mirão, J. (2019). Analytical characterization of ancient mortars from the archaeological Roman site of Pisões. Journal of Construction and Building Materials, 204, 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.23310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.233 ↗
4. Degryse, P., Elsen, J., & Waelkens, M. (2002). Study of ancient mortars from Sagalassos (Turkey) in view of their conservation. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(9), 1457–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00807-410.1016/S0008-8846(02)00807-4 ↗
5. Fort, R., Ergenç, D., Aly, N., de Buergo, M. A., & Hemeda, S. (2021). Implications of new mineral phases in the isotopic composition of Roman lime mortars at the Kom el-Dikka archaeological site in Egypt. Construction and Building Materials, 268, 121085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12108510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121085 ↗
6. Galvan, S., Pla, C., Cueto, N., Martínez-Martínez, J., García-del-Cura, M. A., & Benavente, D. (2014). A comparison of experimental methods for measuring water permeability of porous building rocks. Materiales De Construcción. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2014.0621310.3989/mc.2014.06213 ↗
7. Gheris, A. (2023). New dating approach based on the petrographical, mineralogical, and chemical characterization of ancient lime mortar: Case study of the archaeological site of Hippo, Annaba city, Algeria. Herit Sci. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00942-310.1186/s40494-023-00942-3 ↗
8. Haneefa, K. M., Rani, S. D., Ramasamy, R., & Santhanam, M. (2019). Microstructure and geochemistry of lime plaster mortar from a heritage structure. Construction and Building Materials, 225, 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.15910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.159 ↗
9. Işik, T., & Sağın, E. (2022). Characteristics of Byzantine-period lime mortars and plasters from the Anaia Church. Mater Tehnol, 56(5), 573–583. https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2022.52410.17222/mit.2022.524 ↗
10. Jackson, M. D., Mulcahy, S. R., Chen, H., Li, Y., Li, Q., Cappelletti, P., & Wenk, H. R. (2017). Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite mineral cements produced through low-temperature water-rock reactions in Roman marine concrete. American Mineralogist, 102(7), 1435–1450. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2017-5993CCBY10.2138/am-2017-5993CCBY ↗
11. Kulaib, M., & Al-Jolahy, A. (2006). Back to traditional building materials. Yemeni Engineering, 6(11), 113–122.
12. Kumar, D. N., & Pancharathi, R. K. (2022). Investigations on alternate lime-pozzolana based mortars for repair of heritage structures. Construction and Building Materials, 341, 127776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12777610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127776 ↗
13. Labiadh, M., Ouezdou, M., Hajjem, S., & Mensi, R. (2009). Characterization of waterproof-covering mortars on Ottoman monuments of “Ghar El Melh” (Tunisia). Construction and Building Materials, 23(2), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.007 ↗
14. Manoharan, A., & Umarani, C. (2022). Lime mortar, a boon to the environment: Characterization case study and overview. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(11), 6481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1411648110.3390/su14116481 ↗
15. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., Bakolas, A., Karatasios, I., & Kilikoglou, V. (2005). Hydraulic lime mortars for the restoration of historic masonry in Crete. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(8), 1577–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.001 ↗
16. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., Bakolas, A., & Moropoulou, A. (2003). Physico-chemical study of Cretan ancient mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01030-X10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01030-X ↗
17. Miriello, D., Bloise, A., Crisci, G. M., De Luca, R., De Nigris, B., Martellone, A., Osanna, M., Pace, R., Pecci, A., & Ruggieri, N. (2018). New compositional data on ancient mortars and plasters from Pompeii (Campania–Southern Italy): Archaeometric results and considerations about their time evolution. Materials Characterization, 146, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.10.01810.1016/j.matchar.2018.10.018 ↗
18. Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., & Anagnostopoulou, S. (2005). Composite materials in ancient structures. Cement & Concrete Composites, 27, 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.01810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.018 ↗
19. Papayianni, I., Pachta, V., & Stefanidou, M. (2013). Analysis of ancient mortars and design of compatible repair mortars: The case study of Odeion of the archaeological site of Dion. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.086 ↗
20. Qian, K., Song, Y., Lai, J., Qian, X., Zhang, Z., Liang, Y., & Ruan, S. (2022). Characterization of historical mortar from ancient city walls of Xindeng in Fuyang, China. Construction and Building Materials, 315, 125780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12578010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125780 ↗
21. Rodriguez-Juareza, M. E., Perez-Diaza, E., Lopez-Domingueza, G. I., Picazoa, V. L., Valencia-Cruzb, D., Millan-Maloc, B. M., & Rodriguez-Garcia, M. E. (2022). Development and characterization of lime-based stucco for modern construction and restoration applications based on ancient stuccoes from the “El Cerrito” pyramid, Querétaro, Mexico. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0087510.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00875 ↗
22. Shivakumara, M., & Selvaraj, T. (2020). A scientific study on the role of organic lime mortars of Padmanabhapuram Palace, Thuckalay, Tamil Nadu, India. The European Physical Journal. plus, 135, 923. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00896-610.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00896-6 ↗
23. Siddall, R. (2000). The use of volcaniclastic material in Roman hydraulic concretes: A brief review. In W. J. McGuire, D. R. Griffiths, P. L. Hancock, & I. S. Stewart (Eds.), The archaeology of geological catastrophes (pp. 339–344). Geological Society, Special Publications.
24. Singh, S. K., & Singh, M. R. (2024). Characterization and compositional identification of Stepwell (Baoli) lime plasters from 16th century Arab Ki Sarai, Delhi. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00427-110.1007/s41024-024-00427-1 ↗
25. Solak, A. (2016). Experimental investigation of lime mortar used in historical buildings in Becin, Turkey. Materials Science, 22(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.22.1.902210.5755/j01.ms.22.1.9022 ↗
26. Wei, G., Zhang, H., & Wang, H. (2020). Characterization of ancient building lime mortars of Anhui Province, China: A multi-analytical approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.10255410.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102554 ↗
27. Weiss, C., & Gerlach, I. (2009). Qadhat—A comparative study of ancient and new lime mortar from the Marib province/Yemen. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 1, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-009-0007-210.1007/s12520-009-0007-2 ↗
28. Wonganan, N., Athisakul, C., Mahasuwanchai, P., Tangchirapat, W., Sahamitmongkol, R., & Leelataviwat, S. (2020). Ancient materials and substitution materials used in Thai historical masonry structure preservation. J Renew Mater, 9(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2021.01313410.32604/jrm.2021.013134 ↗
29. Zicarelli, M. A., Ricca, M., Alberghina, M. F., Schiavone, S., La Russa, M. F., & Randazzo, L. (2025). Archaeometric investigation of artificial stone materials from the Theatrum Marcelli (Rome, Italy). Heritage, 8(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage802005710.3390/heritage8020057 ↗