Structural Performance of PC Double Beam–Column Connection Under Gravity and Seismic Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recently, as a new precast concrete (PC) construction method for increasing economy and constructability, the PC double-beam system has been developed for factories or logistic centers, where construction duration is particularly important. In this study, half-scaled PC double beam–column connection was tested under gravity loading and cyclic lateral loading. The major test parameters included the use of the spliced PC column and the addition of reinforcement at the beam–column joint. In the gravity loading test, the flexural behavior of the PC double beam was investigated. The test results showed satisfactory flexural capacity at the PC double-beam section, validating the composite action between the PC and RC members. In the cyclic lateral loading test, the seismic performance of the PC double beam–column connection was investigated. Based on the test results, the failure mode, load-carrying capacity, deformation capacity, energy dissipation capacity, secant stiffness, and shear strength of the PC double-beam system were evaluated and compared with those of a conventional RC double beam–column connection. According to the test results, the structural performance of the PC double beam–column connection was comparable to that of the RC double beam–column connection and satisfied the acceptance criteria of moment frame in the ACI 374.1-05 provision.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–14) and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–19): An ACI Standard: Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318R-19). Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.
3. ACI Committee 374. (2005). Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary: An ACI Standard. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
4. Bae, S., & Bayrak, O. (2008). Plastic hinge length of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 105(3), 290.
5. Chalioris, C. E., & Bantilas, K. E. (2017). Shear strength of reinforced concrete beam-column joints with crossed inclined bars. Engineering Structures, 140, 241–255.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.072 ↗
6. Corley, W. (1966). Rotational capacity of reinforced concrete beams. Journal of the Structural Division, 92(5), 121–146.10.1061/JSDEAG.0001504 ↗
7. Dalalbashi, A., Eslami, A., & Ronagh, H. R. (2012). Plastic hinge relocation in RC joints as an alternative method of retrofitting using FRP. Composite Structures, 94(8), 2433–2439.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.016 ↗
8. Eom, T.-S., Park, H.-G., Hwang, H.-J., & Kang, S.-M. (2015). Plastic hinge relocation methods for emulative pc beam-column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(2), 04015111.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001378 ↗
9. Fenwick, R. C., & Irvine, H. M. (1977). Reinforced concrete beam-column joints for seismic loading: Department of Civil Engineering. Auckland: University of Auckland.
10. Ghayeb, H. H., Razak, H. A., & Sulong, N. R. (2017). Development and testing of hybrid precast concrete beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 258–278.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.073 ↗
11. Girhammar, U. A., & Pajari, M. (2008). Tests and analysis on shear strength of composite slabs of hollow core units and concrete topping. Construction and Building Materials, 22(8), 1708–1722.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.05.013 ↗
12. Han, M.-Y., Jin, K.-S., & Choi, S.-H. (2010). Flexural test for a monolithic holed web prestressed concrete (HWPC) girder. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 4(2), 77–87.10.4334/IJCSM.2010.4.2.77 ↗
13. Hassan, T., & Rizkalla, S. (2002). Flexural strengthening of prestressed bridge slabs with FRP systems. PCI journal, 47(1), 76–93.10.15554/pcij.01012002.76.93 ↗
14. Hirosawa, M. (1977). Strength and ductility of reinforced concrete members in Japanese. Report of the Building Research Institute(76), 1967–1974.
15. Hsu, C.-T.T. (1989). T-shaped reinforced concrete members under biaxial bending and axial compression. Structural Journal, 86(4), 460–468.
16. Im, H.-J., Park, H.-G., Eom, T.-S., & Kang, S.-M. (2010). Earthquake resistance of beam-column connection of precast concrete U-shaped shell construction. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 22(6), 741–751.10.4334/JKCI.2010.22.6.741 ↗
17. Joh, O., Goto, Y., & Shibata, T. (1991). Influence of transverse joint and beam reinforcement and relocation of plastic hinge region on beam column joint stiffness deterioration. Special Publication, 123, 187–224.
18. Joint ACI‐ASCE Committee 352. (2002). Recommendations for design of beam‐column connections in monolithic reinforced concrete structures (ACI 352R‐02). Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.
19. Juette, B. (1996). Moving beam plastic hinges in reinforced concrete frames using headed reinforcement bars. MS thesis, Univ. at Karlsruhe, Germany.
20. Kim, T.-H., Seong, D.-J., & Shin, H. M. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of hollow reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridge columns. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 6(3), 165–176.10.1007/s40069-012-0015-y ↗
21. Korea Concrete Institute. (2012). Concrete design code and commentary. Korea: Kimoondang.
22. Lee, J. D., Yoon, J. K., & Kang, T.H.-K. (2016). Combined half precast concrete slab and post-tensioned slab topping system for basement parking structures. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 1(1), 1–9.10.1080/24705314.2016.1153281 ↗
23. Masi, A., Santarsiero, G., & Nigro, D. (2013). Cyclic tests on external RC beam-column joints: role of seismic design level and axial load value on the ultimate capacity. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(1), 110–136.10.1080/13632469.2012.707345 ↗
24. Meinheit, D. F., & Jirsa, J. O. (1977). Shear strength of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Department of Civil Engineering, Structures Research Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX(77–1), 291. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168543310.14359/51685433 ↗
25. Panagiotakos, T. B., & Fardis, M. N. (2001). Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. Structural Journal, 98(2), 135–148.
26. Park, M.-K., Lee, D. H., Han, S.-J., & Kim, K. S. (2019). Web-shear capacity of thick precast prestressed hollow-core slab units produced by extrusion method. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 13(1), 7.10.1186/s40069-018-0288-x ↗
27. Park, R. (1988). Ductility Evaluation from Laboratory and Analytical Testing. Paper presented at the the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan.
28. Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
29. Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
30. Ren, W., Sneed, L. H., Yang, Y., & He, R. (2015). Numerical simulation of prestressed precast concrete bridge deck panels using damage plasticity model. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(1), 45–54.10.1007/s40069-014-0091-2 ↗
31. Yamamoto, Y., Nagai, O., & Maruta, M. (2008). Structure performance of hinge relocated RC slab-wall frame. Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst, 30(3), 397–402.