Lateral Load Distribution for Hollow Slab Bridge: Field Test Investigation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Distribution factors (DFs) for one typical cross-section as specified in the AASHTO LRFD specification can be varied when the bridge parameters such as span length, loading lanes and skew are changed. The diversity between design and actual DFs may be varied as the bridge parameters changed. To study this diversity, this paper presents an evaluation of lateral load DFs for prefabricated hollow slab bridges. The response of the bridge was recorded during the field test. This field test was divided into two stages: a concentrated force loading test on the prefabricated girder that settled on the bridge supports before the girders were connected transversely and a vehicle loading test after the girders were connected transversely. The instruments used to record the response of the bridge were strain gauges and dial indicators. The measured data in the multi-stages of the field test could be used to calibrate the support condition of the bridge and transverse connection between adjacent girders in the finite element model (FEM) using beam and plate elements. From the FEM, DFs for this hollow slab bridge were determined and compared with the DFs in the AASHTO LRFD specification. A parametric study using the calibrated FEM was then used to investigate the effect of various parameters including span length, skew and bridge deck thickness on the DFs. It was found that AASHTO LRFD specification is conservative compared with the analysis in the FEM, while this conservatism decreased as the span length and skew of the hollow slab bridge increased.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Bakht, B., & Jaeger, L. G. (1988). Bearing restraint in slab-on-girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering,114, 2724–2740.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:12(2724) ↗
2. Barker, M. G. (2001). Quantifying field-test behavior for rating steel girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,6, 254–261.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:4(254) ↗
3. Bechtel, A., McConnell, J., & Chajes, M. (2010). Ultimate capacity destructive testing and finite-element analysis of steel I-girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,16, 197–206.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000137 ↗
4. Civitillo, J. M., Harris, D. K., Gheitasi, A., Saliba, M. & Kassner, B. L. 2014. In-service performance and behavior characterization of the hybrid composite bridge system—A case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.2447.
5. Conner, S., & Huo, X. S. (2006). Influence of parapets and aspect ratio on live-load distribution. Journal of Bridge Engineering,11, 188–196.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(188) ↗
6. Eom, J., & Nowak, A. S. (2001). Live load distribution for steel girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,6, 489–497.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489) ↗
7. Harris, D. K. (2010). Assessment of flexural lateral load distribution methodologies for stringer bridges. Engineering Structures,32, 3443–3451.10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.06.008 ↗
8. Harris, D. K., Civitillo, J. M., & Gheitasi, A. (2016). Performance and behavior of hybrid composite beam bridge in Virginia: Live load testing. Journal of Bridge Engineering.,21, 04016022.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000820 ↗
9. Harris, D. K., Cousins, T., Murray, T. M., & Sotelino, E. D. (2008). Field investigation of a sandwich plate system bridge deck. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,22, 305–315.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(305) ↗
10. Hodson, D. J., Barr, P. J., & Halling, M. W. (2011). Live-load analysis of posttensioned box-girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,17, 644–651.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000302 ↗
11. Mabsout, M. E., Tarhini, K. M., Frederick, G. R., & Kobrosly, M. (1997). Influence of sidewalks and railings on wheel load distribution in steel girder bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,2, 88–96.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1997)2:3(88) ↗
12. Namy, M., Charron, J.-P., & Massicotte, B. (2015). Structural behavior of bridge decks with cast-in-place and precast concrete barriers: Numerical modeling. Journal of Bridge Engineering,20, 04015014.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000751 ↗
13. Schulz, J. L., Commander, B., Goble, G. G., & Frangopol, D. M. (1995). Efficient field testing and load rating of short-and medium-span bridges. Structural Engineering Review,3, 181–194.
14. Seo, J., Kilaru, C., Phares, B. M., & Lu, P. (2015). Live load distribution factors for a short span timber bridge under heavy agricultural vehicles. Structures Congress,2015, 2164–2173.
15. Seo, J., Teja Kilaru, C., Phares, B., & Lu, P. (2017). Agricultural vehicle load distribution for timber bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering,22, 04017085.10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001112 ↗
16. Song, S.-T., Chai, Y., & Hida, S. E. (2003). Live-load distribution factors for concrete box-girder bridges. Journal of bridge engineering,8, 273–280.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:5(273) ↗
17. Waldron, C. J., Cousins, T. E., Nassar, A. J., & Gomez, J. P. (2005). Demonstration of use of high-performance lightweight concrete in bridge superstructure in Virginia. Journal of performance of Constructed Facilities,19, 146–154.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:2(146) ↗
18. Zhou, Y. J., Ma, Z. J., Zhao, Y., Shi, X. W., & He, S. H. (2015). Improved definition of dynamic load allowance factor for highway bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics,54, 561–577.10.12989/sem.2015.54.3.561 ↗
19. Zokaie, T. (2000). AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution specifications. Journal of Bridge Engineering,5, 131–138.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(131) ↗