Experimental Quantification on the Residual Seismic Capacity of Damaged RC Column Members
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To quantify the post-earthquake residual seismic capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) column members, experimental data for 6 column specimens with flexural, flexural–shear and shear failure modes are used to derive residual seismic capacity of damaged RC column members for specified damage states in this work. Besides of the experiment data, some related researches are also investigated to suggest the reduction factors of strength, stiffness and energy dissipation capacity for damaged RC column members, respectively. According to the damage states of RC columns, their corresponding seismic reduction factors are suggested herein. Taking an RC column with the flexural–shear failure for an example, its reductions factors of strength, stiffness and energy dissipation capacity are 0.5, 0.6 and 0.1, respectively. This work also proposes the seismic performance assessment method for the residual seismic performance of earthquake-damaged RC buildings. In the case study, this work selects one actual earthquake-damaged school building to demonstrate the post-earthquake assessment of seismic performance for a damaged RC building.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee (American Concrete Institute). (2005). Building code requirement for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (318R-05). Michigan, USA: Farmington Hills.
2. AIJ (Architecture Institute of Japan). (2004). Guidelines for performance evaluation of earthquake resistant reinforced concrete buildings (Draft). Japan: Tokyo.
3. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings (ASEC-41). Virginia, USA: Reston.
4. ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). California, USA: Redwood City.
5. CSI (Computer and Structures, Inc.). (2008). Extended 3D analysis of building systems (ETABS), nonlinear version 9.5. Berkeley, California, USA: User’s Manual.
6. Di Ludovico, M., Polese, M., d’Aragona, M. G., Prota, A., & Manfredi, G. (2013). A proposal for plastic hinges modification factors for damaged RC columns. Engineering Structures, 51, 99–112.10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.009 ↗
7. Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005a). Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1), 71–89.10.1193/1.1849774 ↗
8. Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005b). Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Structural Journal, 102(4), 578–587.
9. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (1998). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA-273). Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
10. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA-356). Washington, D.C.: FEMA.
11. Ito, Y., Suzuki, Y., & Maeda, M. (2015). Residual seismic performance assessment for damaged RC building considering the reduction of strength, deformation and damping ratio. Proceeding of JCI Annual Convention (Japan Concrete Institute), 37(2), 787–792.
12. JBDPA (Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). (2001). Guideline for post-earthquake damage evaluation and rehabilitation. Tokyo, Japan: JBDPA.
13. JBDPA (Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). (2015). Standard for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings, guidelines for seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings, and technical manual for seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Tokyo, Japan: JBDPA.
14. MOI (Minister of the Interior of Taiwan). (2005). Seismic design code for buildings. Taipei, Taiwan: MOI.
15. Mushtaq, A., Khan, S. A., Ahmad, J., & Ali, M. U. (2018). Effect of 3D models on seismic vulnerability assessment of deficient RC frame structures. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 19(3), 214–221.10.1080/13287982.2018.1480910 ↗
16. NCREE (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan). (2009). Technology handbook for seismic evaluation and retrofit of school buildings (NCREE-09-023). Taipei, Taiwan: NCREE.
17. NCREE (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan). (2012). Seismic performance evaluation deteriorating and earthquake-damaged RC school buildings (NCREE-12-018). Taipei, Taiwan: NCREE.
18. Park, Y. J., & Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of the Structural Engineering (ASCE), 111(4), 722–739.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722) ↗
19. Poegoeh, A.C. (2012). Reduction factors of seismic capacity for earthquake-damaged reinforced concrete columns. Master thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
20. Seo, J., Hu, J. W., & Davaajamts, B. (2015). Seismic performance evaluation of multistory reinforced concrete moment resisting frame structure with shear walls. Sustainability, 7, 14287–14308.10.3390/su71014287 ↗
21. Sugi, T., Ishimori, A., Tajima, K., & Shirai, N. (2007). Damage evaluation of RC beam members based on accurate measurement of displacement and crack widths with scanner (Part 2): Proposal of rational suggestion of quantitative evaluation model for evaluating of shear crack width-shear deformation relationship, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), C-2, 373–374.