Effect of GFRP Stirrup Confinement on the Bond Strength of GFRP-RC Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The current provisions for development length in the ACI 440.11 code disregard the confinement effect provided by stirrups on the bond strength of longitudinal bars and require splice lengths that pose implementation challenges. Given the significant improvement in GFRP material properties, this study investigated the bond strength of sand-coated GFRP bars and proposed a new factor to include the effect of stirrup confinement on the bond-strength provisions. The experimental program involved 16 GFRP-reinforced concrete (RC) beams having a width of 300 mm, and depth 440 mm, consisting of two repetitions for every configuration, subjected to four-point loading. The test parameters comprised lap-splice length and stirrup spacing in the lap-spliced zone. Out of 16 GFRP-RC beams, two beams were reinforced with two M16 (No. 5) continuous bars and six with varying lap-splice lengths [i.e., 40, 60, and 80 bar diameters (db)] without confining stirrups. To evaluate the effect of confining stirrups, eight beams were reinforced with two M16 (No. 5) lap-spliced longitudinal bars (i.e., 40 and 60 db) and M13 (No. 4) stirrups spaced at 100 mm (4 in.) and 200 mm (8 in.) center-to-center. Based on experimental results, stirrup confinement clearly increased the bond strength, reduced longitudinal bar slippage, and increased splitting stress. The beams with a splice length of 60 db and stirrups on 100 mm (4 in.) centers achieved 57% higher capacity than those with the same lap-splice length but without stirrups. Further, the ACI 440.11 equation overestimated the bond strength of sand-coated GFRP bars but yielded conservative results with closely spaced stirrups. CSA S6:25 predicted bond-strength values that were close to the experimental results compared to CSA S6:19, and CSA S806:12.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbas, H., Elsanadedy, H., Alaoud, L., Almusallam, T., & Al-Salloum, Y. (2023). Effect of confining stirrups and bar gap in improving bond behavior of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar lap splices in RC beams. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12994310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129943 ↗
2. ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass FRP Bars. ACI 440.11–22. ACI.
3. Al-Salloum, Y., Alaoud, L., Elsanadedy, H., Albidah, A., Almusallam, T., & Abbas, H. (2022). Bond performance of GFRP bar-splicing in reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.000119010.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001190 ↗
4. Aly, R., Benmokrane, B., & Ebead, U. (2006). Tensile lap splicing of bundled CFRP reinforcing bars in concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 10(4), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1061/ASCE1090-0268200610:428710.1061/ASCE1090-0268200610:4287 ↗
5. ASTM (American Society of Testing Materials). 2021. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M-21. West Conshohocken, PA. USA.
6. ASTM (American Society of Testing Materials). 2023. Standard specification for basalt and glass fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM D8505–23. West Conshohocken, PA. USA.
7. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and Construction of building structures with fiber reinforced polymers. CSA S806:12. CSA.
8. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Canadian Bridge Design Code. CSA S6:19. CSA.
9. CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2025. Canadian Bridge Design Code. CSA S6:25. CSA.
10. Darwin, D., Zuo, J., Tholen, M. (1996). Development length criteria for conventional and high relative rib area reinforcing bars. ACI Structural Journal, 93(3), 1–13.10.14359/9694 ↗
11. Esfahani, M. R., Rakhshanimehr, M., & Mousavi, S. R. (2013). Bond strength of lap-spliced GFRP bars in concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.000035910.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000359 ↗
12. Harajli, M., & Abouniaj, M. (2010). Bond performance of GFRP bars in tension: Experimental evaluation and assessment of ACI 440 guidelines. Journal of Composites for Construction, 14(6), 659–668.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000139 ↗
13. Hussain, Z., & Nanni, A. (2023). Design and Detailing of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete beams according to ACI 440.11-22. ACI Structural Journal. https://doi.org/10.14359/5173874410.14359/51738744 ↗
14. Mosley, C. P., Tureyen, A. K., & Frosch, R. J. (2008). Bond strength of nonmetallic reinforcing bars. ACI Structural Journal, 105(5), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.14359/1994710.14359/19947 ↗
15. Orangun, C. O., Jirsa, J. O., & Breen, J. E. (1977). A reevaluation of test data on development length and splices. ACI Journal Proceedings, 74(3), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.14359/1099310.14359/10993 ↗
16. Ortiz, J. D., Khedmatgozar Dolati, S. S., Malla, P., Nanni, A., & Mehrabi, A. (2023). FRP-reinforced/strengthened concrete: State-of-the-art review on durability and mechanical effects. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1605199010.3390/ma16051990 ↗
17. Pay, A. C., Canbay, E., & Frosch, R. J. (2014). Bond strength of spliced fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 111(2), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.14359/5168651910.14359/51686519 ↗
18. Tepfers, R. (1982). Lapped tensile reinforcement splices. Journal of the Structural Division, 108(1), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.000586510.1061/JSDEAG.0005865 ↗
19. Tighiouart, B., & Benmokrane, P. M. (1999). Bond strength of glass FRP rebar splices in beams under static loading. Construction and Building Materials., 13(1999), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00037-910.1016/S0950-0618(99)00037-9 ↗
20. Wambeke, B. W., & Shield, C. K. (2006). Development length of glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars in concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 103(1), 11–17.
21. Wu, C., Hwang, H. J., & Ma, G. (2022). Effect of stirrups on the bond behavior of lap spliced GFRP bars in concrete beams. Engineering Structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11455210.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114552 ↗