Control of Tensile Stress in Prestressed Concrete Members Under Service Loads
Source abstract
Abstract
In current design codes, crack control design criterion for prestressed concrete (PSC) members is stricter than conventional reinforced concrete (RC) members. In particular, it is stipulated that the net tensile stress of prestressing strands should be controlled under 250 MPa in the serviceability design of PSC members belonging to the Class C category section that is expected to be cracked due to flexure under service load conditions as defined in ACI318 code. Thus, the cracked section analysis is essentially required to estimate the tensile stress of the prestressing strands under the service loads, which requires very complex iterative calculations, thereby causing many difficulties in the applications of the Class C PSC members in practice. Thus, this study proposed a simple method to estimate the net tensile stress of the prestressing strands (Δf ps ) under the service load conditions, and also provided a summary table to be used for checking whether the net tensile stress (Δf ps ) exceeds the stress limit (250 or 350 MPa) with respect to the magnitude of effective prestress (f se ).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
2. American Association of state Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). AASHTO LEFD bridge design specifications: Customary U.S. units (5th ed.). Washington, D.C: AASHTO.
3. Atutis, M., Valivonis, J., & Atutis, E. (2015). Analysis of serviceability limit state of GFRP prestressed concrete beams. Composite Structures, 134(15), 450–459.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.062 ↗
4. Bentz, E.C. (2000). Sectional analysis of reinforced concrete members. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5. Collins, M. P., & Mitchell, D. (1991). Prestressed concrete structures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Devalapura, R. K., & Tadros, M. K. (1992). Stress-strain modeling of 270 ksi low-relaxation prestresssing strands. PCI Journal, 37(2), 100–106.10.15554/pcij.03011992.100.106 ↗
7. Frosch, R. J. (1999). Another look at cracking and crack control in reinforced concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 99(3), 437–442.
8. Gagely, P., & Lut, L. (1968). Maximum cracks width in reinforcement concrete flexural member. ACI Special Publication SP-20, 20, 87–117.
9. Harries, K. A., Shahrooz, B. M., & Soltani, A. (2012). Flexural crack widths in concrete girders with high-strength reinforcement. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(1), 29–57.
10. Karayannis, C. G., & Chalioris, C. E. (2013). Design of partially prestressed concrete beams based on the cracking control provisions. Engineering Structures, 48(1), 402–416.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.020 ↗
11. Kim, K. S., & Lee, D. H. (2011). Flexural behavior of prestressed composite beams with corrugated web: Part II. Experiment and verification. Composite Part B: Engineering, 42(1), 1617–1629.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.019 ↗
12. Kim, K. S., Lee, D. H., Choi, S. M., Choi, Y. H., & Jung, S. H. (2011). Flexural behavior of prestressed composite beams with corrugated web: Part I. Development and analysis. Composite Part B: Engineering, 42(6), 1603–1616.10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.020 ↗
13. Lee, D. H., Hwang, J. H., Kim, K. S., Kim, J. S., Chung, W., & Oh, H. (2014). Simplified strength design method for allowable compressive stressed in pretensioned concrete members at transfer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(7), 2209–2217.10.1007/s12205-014-0696-7 ↗
14. Lee, D. H., & Kim, K. S. (2011). Flexural strength of prestressed concrete members with unbonded tendons. Structural Engineering Mechanics, 38(5), 675–696.10.12989/sem.2011.38.5.675 ↗
15. Lee, J. Y., Lee, D. H., Hwang, J. H., Park, M. K., Kim, Y. H., & Kim, K. S. (2013). Investigation on allowable compressive stresses in pre-tensioned concrete members at transfer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(5), 1083–1098.10.1007/s12205-013-0309-x ↗
16. Marí, A., Bairán, J. M., Cladera, A., & Oller, E. (2016). Shear design and assessment of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams based on a mechanical model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(10), 1–17.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001539 ↗
17. Mast, R. F., Dawood, M., Rizkalla, S. H., & Zia, P. (2008). Flexural strength design of concrete beams reinforced with high-strength steel bars. ACI Structural Journal, 105(5), 570–577.
18. Mattock, A. H. (1979). Flexural strength of prestressed concrete sections by programmable calculator. PCI Journal, 24(1), 32–54.10.15554/pcij.01011979.32.54 ↗
19. Nawy, E. G. (2010). Prestressed concrete: A fundamental approach (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc.
20. Park, H., & Cho, J. Y. (2017). Ductility analysis of prestressed concrete members with high-strength strands and code. ACI Structural Journal, 114(34), 407–416.
21. Park, H., Jeong, S., Lee, S. C., & Cho, J. Y. (2016). Flexural behavior of post-tensioned prestressed concrete girders with high-strength strands. Engineering Structures, 112(1), 90–99.10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.004 ↗
22. Park, J. H., Park, H., & Cho, J. Y. (2017). Prediction of stress in bonded strands at flexural. ACI Structural Journal, 114(56), 697–705.
23. Patel, K. A., Chaudhary, S., & Nagpal, A. K. (2016). A tension stiffening model for analysis of RC flexural members under service load. Computers and Concrete, 17(1), 29–57.10.12989/cac.2016.17.1.029 ↗
24. Prestressed Concrete Institute. (2010). PCI design handbook: Precast and prestressed concrete. Chicago, IL: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
25. Rodriguez-Gutierrez, J. A., & Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. (2000). Partially and fully prestressed concrete sections under biaxial bending and axial load. ACI Structural Journal, 97(4), 553–563.
26. Sahamitmongkol, R., & Kishi, T. (2011). Tension stiffening effect and bonding characteristics of chemically prestressed concrete under tension. Materials and Structures, 44(2), 455–474.10.1617/s11527-010-9641-5 ↗
27. Scholz, H. (1990). Ductility, redistribution, and hyperstatic moments in partially prestressed members. ACI Structural Journal, 87(3), 341–349.
28. Skogman, B. C., Tadros, M. K., & Grasmick, R. (1988). Flexural strength of prestressed concrete members. PCI Journal, 33(5), 96–123.10.15554/pcij.09011988.96.123 ↗
29. Soltani, A., Harries, K. A., & Shahrooz, B. M. (2013). Crack opening behavior of concrete reinforced with high strength reinforcing steel. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 7(4), 253–264.10.1007/s40069-013-0054-z ↗
30. Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1986). The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal, 83(2), 219–231.