Seismic Fragility of Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls with Coupling Beams Designed Using a Performance-Based Procedure
Source abstract
Abstract
The seismic performance of ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls, that are commonly used in high-rise residential buildings in Korea (h < 60 m), but are prohibited for tall buildings (h ≥ 60 m), is evaluated in this research project within the framework of collapse probability. Three bidimensional analytical models comprised of both coupled and uncoupled shear walls exceeding 60 m in height were designed using nonlinear dynamic analysis in accordance with Korean performance-based seismic design guidelines. Seismic design based on nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed using different shear force amplification factors in order to determine an appropriate factor. Then, an incremental dynamic analysis was performed to evaluate collapse fragility in accordance with the (Federal Emergency Management Agency) FEMA P695 procedure. Four engineering demand parameters including inter-story drift, plastic hinge rotation angle, concrete compressive strain and shear force were introduced to investigate the collapse probability of the designed analytical models. For all analytical models, flexural failure was the primary failure mode but shear force amplification factors played an important role in order to meet the requirement on collapse probability. High-rise ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls designed using seven pairs of ground motion components and a shear force amplification factor ≥ 1.2 were adequate to satisfy the criteria on collapse probability and the collapse margin ratio prescribed in FEMA P695.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
Division of Architecture and Urban Design, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
Funding
Incheon National University
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Architectural Institute of Korea (2016). Korean Building Code 2016, AIK.
2. Architectural Institute of Korea (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Residential Buildings, Korea Building Code Center: AIK.
3. ASCE 7-16 (2016). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE.
4. Applied Technology Council (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors.
5. Seismic Performance of Special Shear Wall Structural System with Effectively Reduced Reinforcement Detail
6. Seismic safety evaluation of reinforced concrete walls through FEMA P695 methodology10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001221 ↗
7. Gogus, A. (2010). Structural Wall Systems-Nonlinear Modeling and Collapse Assessment of Shear Walls and Slab-Column Frames, University of California.
8. Nazari, Y.R. (2017). Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings in Canada, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa.
9. A review of research on seismic behaviour of irregular building structures since 200210.1007/s10518-007-9052-3 ↗
10. A practical approach for estimating the floor deformability in existing RC buildings: Evaluation of the effects in the structural response and seismic fragility10.1007/s10518-019-00774-2 ↗
11. A numerical procedure for modeling the floor deformability in seismic analysis of existing RC buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2018.05.019 ↗
12. Architectural Institute of Korea (2019). KDS 41 17 00, Seismic Building Design Code, Ministry of land.
13. (2018, March 13). PEER. Available online: https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/site.
14. A Method for Selecting Ground Motions Considering Target Response Spectrum Mean, Variance and Correlation-I Algorithm
15. (2018, March 13). MIDAS Gen. Available online: http://www.midasit.com.
16. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
17. Strength and ductility of confined concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1590) ↗
18. Quasi-static cyclic tests and plastic hinge analysis of RC structural walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.018 ↗
19. Displacement-based design of slender reinforced concrete structural walls—Experimental verification10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618) ↗
20. Flexural modeling of reinforced concrete walls-experimental verification
21. Tuna, Z. (2012). Seismic Performance, Modeling, and Failure Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Buildings, UCLA.
22. Korea Concrete Institute (2016). KDS 14 20 80, Ministry of land.
23. (2018, March 13). PERFORM 3D V7. Available online: https://www.csiamerica.com.
24. Hassan, W., Anwar, N., Norachan, P., and Najam, F.A. (2018, January 25–27). The Seismic Performance Evaluation of RC High-rise Buildings Designed to Various Building Codes. Proceedings of the IABSE Conference-Engineering the Developing World, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.2749/kualalumpur.2018.0427 ↗
25. Moehle, J., Bozorgnia, Y., Jayaram, N., Jones, P., Rahnama, M., and Shome, N. (2011). Case Studies of the Seismic Performance of Tall Buildings Designed by Alternative Means, Report for the Tall Buildings Initiative, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
26. Tall Buildings Initiative (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California.
27. American Society of Civil Engineers (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI.
28. Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Lange, S.T., and Deierlein, G.G. (2007). Beam–Column Element Model Calibrated for Predicting Flexural Response Leading to Global Collapse of RC Framing Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley.
29. Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection10.1002/eqe.571 ↗
30. Conditional spectrum-based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk-based assessments10.1002/eqe.2301 ↗
31. ASCE 7-05 (2006). Minimum Design Load for Buildings and other Structures, ASCE.
32. Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes10.1002/eqe.2603 ↗
33. An improved algorithm for selecting ground motions to match a conditional spectrum10.1080/13632469.2016.1264334 ↗
34. On the number of records for structural risk estimation in PBEE10.1002/eqe.3145 ↗
35. Orientation-independent measures of ground motion10.1785/0120050209 ↗
36. Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion10.1785/0120090400 ↗
37. Incremental dynamic analysis10.1002/eqe.141 ↗
38. Kircher, C., Deierlein, G., Hooper, J., Krawinkler, H., Mahin, S., Shing, B., and Wallace, J. (2010). Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
39. Shear strength of low-rise reinforced concrete walls
40. Evaluation of UBC-94 provision for seismic design of RC structural walls10.1193/1.1585883 ↗