How to Optimize the Implementation of ITIL through a Process Ordering Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the main points when implementing the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) is which order the processes must be implemented. In the systematic literature review (SLR) developed, it is possible to find references about strategies and factors that ease the implementation of the ITIL, static sequences for the processes to be implemented, and recommendations about the first process to implement, but it is rather complicated to find references that explicitly define the order (adapted to a specific company) of the processes to be implemented. Thus, once it is shown that there is no methodology/algorithm providing a sequence of ITIL processes specifically adapted for each company, an algorithm to solve this problem is presented: The algorithm has a deep mathematical basis and returns a sequence of ITIL processes to optimize the efforts during implementation, so the company implementing the ITIL gets the closest to the competitors. The optimization is made considering parameters such as staff, age of the company, IT size, industry, etc. Thus, the sequence proposed is specific for each company. Finally, a comparative of the sequence obtained (from the proposed algorithm) with sequences discovered in the SLR is presented and applied to a real case.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Big Data and Business Intelligence · ERP Systems Implementation and Impact · Information Technology Governance and Strategy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UDIMA, 28400 Collado Villalba, Spain
UNED, 28040 Madrid, Spain
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Mitev, Y., and Kirilov, L. (2014, January 25–27). Using IT Management Processes for Achieving Better Efficiency in the IT Service. Proceedings of the ICEST 2014, Niš, Serbia. Available online: http://www.icestconf.org/.
2. Supporting the module sequencing decision in ITIL solution implementation: An application of the fuzzy TOPSIS approach10.4018/ijitsa.2014070103 ↗
3. HP (2018, May 31). HP IT Service Management (ITSM). Transforming IT Organizations into Service Providers. Available online: Ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/services/itsm/info/itsm_businesswp.pdf.
4. Towards a poolimg of ITIL v3 and COBIT
5. Pérez, D.H. (2018, May 31). De la Administración al Gobierno de TI. Available online: http://52.0.140.184/typo43/fileadmin/Revista_97/7_-_tres.pdf.
6. COBIT in relation to other international standars
7. Haren, V. (2016). Gestión de Servicios TI Basado en ITIL.
8. Fry, M. (2010). ITIL Lite: A Road Map to Full or Partial ITIL Implementation, The Stationery Office. ISBN 0113312121 9780113312122.
9. ITIL in small to medium sized enterprises software companies: Towards an implementarion sequence10.1002/smr.1727 ↗
10. Justifications, strategies and critical success factors in successful ITIL implementations in US and Australian companies: An exploratory study10.1080/10580530902797540 ↗
11. Sharifi, M., Ayat, M., Rahman, A., and Sahibuddin, S. (2008, January 26–28). Lessons Learned in ITIL Implementation Failure. Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631627 ↗
12. (2019, July 31). Website: Top 10 Reasons Why do ITSM Implementation Fails. Available online: https://www.novelvista.com/blogs/it-service-management/why-itsm-tools-implemenation-fail.
13. Miller, A.C. (2017). Implementation Priority of the ITIL Framework Based on a Process Sequencing Model. [Ph.D. Thesis, The George Washington University].
14. Cater-Steel, A., and Tan, W.G. (2005, January 14–16). Implementation of IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) in Australia: Progress and Success Factors. Proceedings of the IT Governance International Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
15. ITIL implementation: Critical success factors a comparative case study using the BPC framework
16. Khosravi, H., and Wang, J. (2011). How to Implement ITIL Successfully?: What Steps are Necessary to Implement ITIL What Factors are Critical within Implementation Process, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
17. Masarat, A., Mohammad, S., Shamsul, S., and Sulaimi, I. (2009, January 25–29). Adoption Factors and Implementation Steps of ITSM in the Target. Proceedings of the 2009 Third Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation, Bali, Indonesia.10.1109/AMS.2009.114 ↗
18. Ahmad, N., and Shamsudin, Z.M. (2013, January 16). Systematic Approach to Successful Implementation of ITIL. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM), Suzhou, China.
19. How small and medium enterprises can begin their implementation of ITIL?
20. O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., and Messnarz, R. (2008). A Solution for Establishing the Information Technology Service Management Processes Implementation Sequence, Springer. Software Process Improvement; EuroSPI 2008; Communications in Computer and Information.10.1007/978-3-540-85936-9 ↗
21. IT Service Management: A Cross-national Study of ITIL Adoption
22. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York (2009). Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Available online: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf.
23. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 ↗
24. Kitchenham, B., and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, University of Durham. Version 2.3; EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01.
25. Petticrew, M., and Roberts, H. (2005). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, Blackwell Pub.10.1002/9780470754887 ↗
26. Stapic, S., López, E.G., Cabot, A.G., Ortega, M., and Strahonja, L.V. (2012, January 19–21). Performing Systematic Literature Review in Software Engineering. Proceedings of the Central European Conference Information and Intelligent Systems (CECIIS’ 12), Varazdin, Croatia.
27. Zarrazvand, H., and Shojafar, M. (2012). The Use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps in Analyzing and Implementation of ITIL Processes. arXiv.
28. Menken, I. (2009). ITIL V3 Implementation Quick Guide–The Art of Stress-Free IT Service Management, Emereo Pty Ltd.
29. Mehravani, S., Haghighinasan, M., and Hajjiheydari, N. (2011). ITIL adoption model based on TAM. 2011 International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, IACSIT Press. IPEDR.
30. Una propuesta organizativa de los procesos de SD y SS en ITIL
31. Graña, M., Toro, C., Posada, J., Howlett, R.J., and Jain, L.C. Ontologically Aided Rule Model for the Implementation of ITIL Processes. Advances in Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, IOS Press.
32. Implementing an IT service information management framework: The case of COTEMAR10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.08.004 ↗
33. Information technology service management models applied to medium and small organizations: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.csi.2015.10.001 ↗
34. The impact of senior management involvement, organisational commitment and group efficacy on ITIL implementation benefits10.1007/s10257-014-0253-4 ↗
35. Roar, T., and Iden, J. (2012, January 3–7). ITIL Implementation: The Role of ITIL Software and Project Quality. Proceedings of the 2012 23rd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Vienna, Austria.
36. Mahy, Y., Ouzzif, M., and Bouragba, K. (2016, January 28–29). Supporting ITIL Processes Implementation Using Business Process Management Systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Systems of Collaboration (SysCo), Casablanca, Morocco.10.1109/SYSCO.2016.7831338 ↗
37. Barriers to implementing ITIL-a multi-case study on the service-based industry10.7903/cmr.1131 ↗
38. Sousa, R., and Mira, M. (2010, January 5–10). A Maturity Model for Implementing ITIL v3. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 6th World Congress on Services, Miami, FL, USA.
39. ITIL self-assessment approach for small and medium agencies
40. Technology adoption model and a road map to successful implementation of ITIL10.1108/JEIM-07-2013-0041 ↗
41. El Yamami, A., Mansouri, K., and Qbadou, M. (2016, January 24–26). Toward a New Multi-Agents Architecture for the Adoption of ITIL Framework by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), Tangier, Morocco.10.1109/CIST.2016.7805091 ↗