Thematic Accuracy Quality Control by Means of a Set of Multinomials
Source abstract
Abstract
The error matrix has been adopted as both the “de facto” and the “de jure” standard way to report on the thematic accuracy assessment of any remotely sensed data product. This perspective assumes that the error matrix can be considered as a set of values following a unique multinomial distribution. However, the assumption of the underlying statistical model falls down when true reference data are available for quality control. To overcome this problem, a new method for thematic accuracy quality control is proposed, which uses a multinomial approach for each category and is called QCCS (quality control column set). The main advantage is that it allows us to state a set of quality specifications for each class and to test if they are fulfilled. These requirements can be related to the percentage of correctness in the classification for a particular class but also to the percentage of possible misclassifications or confusions between classes. In order to test whether such specifications are achieved or not, an exact multinomial test is proposed for each category. Furthermore, if a global hypothesis test is desired, the Bonferroni correction is proposed. All these new approaches allow a more flexible way of understanding and testing thematic accuracy quality control compared with the classical methods based on the confusion matrix. For a better understanding, a practical example of an application is included for classification with four categories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ingeniería Cartográfica, Geodésica y Fotogrametría, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. OXERA (2013). What is the Economic Impact of Geoservices? Prepared for Google, Oxera Consulting Ltd.. Available online: https://www.oxera.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/What-is-the-economic-impact-of-Geo-services_1-1.pdf.
2. Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets10.1002/joc.1322 ↗
3. Thirty Years of Research on Spatial Data Quality: Achievements, Failures, and Opportunities10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01212.x ↗
4. ISO (2002). ISO 19113:2002 Geographic Information—Quality Principles, International Organization for Standardization.
5. ISO (1994). ISO 5725-1:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results—Part 1: General Principles and Definitions, International Organization for Standardization.
6. ISO (2013). ISO 19157:2013 Geographic Information—Data Quality, International Organization for Standardization.
7. Meidinger, D.V. (2003). Protocol for Accuracy Assessment of Ecosystem Maps, British Columbia Ministry of Forest, Forest Science Program, Crown Publications. Available online: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Tr/Tr011.htm.
8. Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015 ↗
9. Lea, C., and Curtis, A.C. (2019, July 24). Thematic Accuracy Assessment Procedures. National Park Service Vegetation Inventory, Available online: https://www1.usgs.gov/vip/standards/NPSVI_Accuracy_Assessment_Guidelines_ver2.pdf.
10. Congalton, R.G., and Green, K. (2009). Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9781420055139 ↗
11. Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00010-8 ↗
12. An accuracy assessment framework for large-area land cover classification products derived from medium-resolution satellite data10.1080/01431160500185284 ↗
13. Strahler, A.H., Boschetti, L., Foody, G.M., Friedl, M.A., Hansen, M.C., Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Morisette, J.T., Stehman, S.V., and Woodcock, C.E. (2006). Global Land Cover Validation: Recommendations for Evaluation and Accuracy Assessment of Global Land Cover Maps, European Commision, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Available online: https://publications.europa.eu/s/kVoK.
14. ISO (2007). ISO 19131:2007 Geographic Information—Data Product Specifications, International Organization for Standardization.
15. Ariza-López, F.J. (2013). Fundamentos de Evaluación de la Calidad de la Información Geográfica, Universidad de Jaén.
16. Congalton, R.G. (1993, January 24–26). Accuracy assessment of remotely sensed data: Future needs and directions. Proceedings of the Pecora 12 Symposium: Land Information from Space-Based Systems, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
17. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4 ↗
18. Spatial analysis of remote sensing image classification accuracy10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.005 ↗
19. Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.010 ↗
20. A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation
21. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and proposal for a cost-based approach10.1080/014311699212560 ↗
22. Mapping National Park landscape from ground, air and space10.1080/01431160050110250 ↗
23. Khorram, S. (1999). Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing-Derived Change Detection, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
24. Revised mapping of lava flows on Mount Etna, Sicily
25. Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources
26. Remote mineralogic and lithologic mapping of the Ice River Alkaline Complex, British Columbia, Canada using AVIRIS data
27. Merchant, J.W., Yang, L., and Yang, W. (1993, January 24–26). Validation of continental scale land cover data bases developed from AVHRR data. Proceedings of the Pecora 12 Symposium: Land Information From Space-Based Systems, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
28. An uncertainty-based method of photo-interpretation
29. Global Land Cover Mapping: A Review and Uncertainty Analysis10.3390/rs61212070 ↗
30. Global land cover mapping using Earth observation satellite data: Recent progresses and challenges10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.001 ↗
31. Modeling the Effects of Horizontal Positional Error on Classification Accuracy Statistics10.14358/PERS.82.10.789 ↗
32. ASPRS (2015). ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 81, A1–A26.10.14358/PERS.81.3.A1-A26 ↗
33. The effects of imperfect reference data on remote sensing-assisted estimators of land cover class proportions10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.002 ↗
34. Ariza-López, F.J. (2004). Evaluación de la Calidad de Diversas Series Cartográficas del Instituto de Cartografía de Andalucía: Informe Correspondiente a la Fase de Definición de Métodos, Instituto de Cartografía de Andalucía.
35. Defourny, P., Bontemps, S., Obsomer, V., Schouten, L., Bartalev, S., Herold, M., Bicheron, P., van Bogaert, E., Leroy, M., and Arino, O. (July, January 28). Accuracy assessment of global land cover maps: Lessons learnt from the GlobCover and GlobCorine experiences. Proceedings of the 2010 European Space Agency Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, Norway.
36. Accuracy assessment of seven global land cover datasets over China10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.016 ↗
37. Senseman, G.M., Bagley, C.F., and Tweddale, S.A. (1995). Accuracy Assessment of the Discrete Classification of Remotely-Sensed Digital Data for Landcover Mapping, US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories. Available online: http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA296212.
38. Mansourian, A., Pilesjö, P., Harrie, L., and van Lammeren, R. (2018). Ariza-López, F.J.; Rodríguez-Avi, J.; Alba-Fernández, V. A Positional Quality Control Test Based on Proportions. Geospatial Technologies for All, AGILE 2018, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, Springer. Rodríguez-Avi, J.
39. Ariza-López, F.J., Rodríguez-Avi, J., González-Aguilera, D., and Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P. (2019). A New Method for Positional Accuracy control for Non-Normal Errors Applied to Airborne Laser Scanner Data. App. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183887 ↗
40. A Network Algorithm for Performing Fisher’s Exact Test in r × c Contingency Tables
41. Exact properties of some exact test statistics for comparing two binomial proportions10.1080/01621459.1990.10475318 ↗
42. Multiple hypotheses testing in genomics10.1002/sim.6082 ↗