journal article·2019-09-30Open access

Biomechanical Performance of the Cemented Hip Stem with Different Surface Finish

Jui-Pin Hung, Yu-Wei Bai, Chung-Qua Hung, Tsui-Er Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 19

Abstract

The integrity of the cemented fixation interface is responsible for the long-term longevity of artificial hip prostheses. Metallic stems with roughened surfaces are considered to provide stronger adhesion with cement. However, clinical studies have reported that roughened stems show a lower survival rate than polished stems. These studies clearly reveal that the causes of artificial stem loosening are very complicated and multifaceted. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the mechanical effect of stem surface finish in cemented hip replacement. To accomplish this, a series of cement–metal specimens were tested configurations to assess the mechanical characteristics of the cement–metal interface specimens. A finite elemental model of cemented femoral prostheses was then created, in which the cement–stem interface was assumed to be in different bonding states according to the experimentally measured interface properties. The failure probabilities of the cement mantle and cemented interface under physiological loadings were evaluated. Experimental results indicate that the polished metal produced higher interfacial tensile and lower shearing strengths than the roughened metal. The polished stems were predicted to induce a lower failure probability of cement mantle and higher integrity of the cement–stem interface when compared to the roughened stem. Overall, current results provide significant evidence to support the clinical outcomes of cemented hip prostheses with different stem surface finishes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate Institute of Precision Manufacturing, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 41170, Taiwan

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 41170, Taiwan

Office of Physical Education, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty: one surgeon’s perspective10.1097/00003086-199201000-00003 ↗
2. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis: interface after total hip replacement10.2106/00004623-199509000-00004 ↗
3. Fatigue of the bone/cement interface and loosening of total joint replacements10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.005 ↗
4. Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems10.1097/00003086-199703000-00038 ↗
5. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071634 ↗
6. Strengthening mechanisms of bone bonding to crystalline hydroxyapatite in vivo10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.017 ↗
7. Effect of metal surface topography on mechanical bonding at simulated total hip stem–cement interfaces10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:4<440::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
8. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old10.2106/00004623-199904000-00005 ↗
9. Tensile bonding strength of the cement-prosthesis interface10.3928/0147-7447-19940201-12 ↗
10. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.006 ↗
11. Static shear strength between polished stem and seven commercial acrylic bone cements10.1007/s10856-007-3211-6 ↗
12. Factors affecting the static shear strength of the prosthetic stem-bone cement interface10.1023/A:1021501520479 ↗
13. Influence of femoral stem surface finish on the apparent static shear strength at the stem–cement interface10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.06.001 ↗
14. Mixed-mode failure strength of implant–cement interface specimens with varying surface roughness10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.037 ↗
15. Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a roughened femoral stem: Integrity of the stem–cement interface10.1054/arth.2003.50093 ↗
16. A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00298-5 ↗
17. Survival of polished compared with precoated roughened cemented femoral components. A prospective, randomized study10.2106/JBJS.G.01043 ↗
18. Failure of the cement–bone interface. A consequence of strengthening the cement-prosthesis interface?10.1302/0301-620X.76B1.8300681 ↗
19. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems10.1302/0301-620X.80B4.0800573 ↗
20. A rough surface finish adversely affect the survivorship of a cemented femoral stem10.1097/00003086-200507000-00024 ↗
21. Advantages in using cemented polished tapered stems when performing total hip arthroplasty in very young patients10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.031 ↗
22. Polished cemented femoral stems have a lower rate of revision than matt finished cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 96,315 cemented femoral stems10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.002 ↗
23. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: the influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00278-X ↗
24. The role of surface pre-treatment on the microstructure, corrosion and fretting corrosion of cemented femoral stems10.1016/j.biotri.2015.12.001 ↗
25. Damage mechanisms at the cement–implant interface of polished cemented femoral stems10.1002/jbm.b.33739 ↗
26. Factors affecting surgical alloy/bone cement interface adhesion10.1002/jbm.820140510 ↗
27. Tensile strength of the cement–bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00164-9 ↗
28. Contact damage failure analyses of fretting wear behavior of the metal stem titanium alloy–bone cement interface10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.025 ↗
29. The influence of surface roughness on stem–cement gaps10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.0841199 ↗
30. Integrity of the stem–cement interface in THA: Effects of stem surface finish and cement porosity10.1002/jbm.b.31071 ↗
31. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00051-8 ↗
32. Computational modeling of debonding behavior at the bone/cement interface with experimental validation10.1016/j.msec.2010.01.003 ↗
33. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results10.2106/00004623-199401000-00010 ↗
34. OrthnNorCal (2019, September 19). Cemented hip vs cementless hip replacement implants. Available online: https://www.orthonorcal.com/cemented-hip-vs-cementless-hip-replacement–implants.
35. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model10.1016/0021-9290(94)00158-Z ↗
36. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants10.1115/1.1412452 ↗
37. Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<605::AID-JBM22>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
38. Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: Review of the literature10.1002/jbm.820221404 ↗
39. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement10.1097/00003086-199608000-00040 ↗
40. On the magnitude and variability of the fatigue strength of acrylic bone cement10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00055-4 ↗
41. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00088-X ↗
42. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.07.029 ↗
43. Effects of interfacial debonding on fatigue damage of cemented hip prosthesis10.1080/02533839.2003.9670833 ↗
44. Hip-joint and abductor muscle forces adequately represent in vivo loading of a cemented total hip reconstruction10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00225-6 ↗
45. Three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components10.1016/0021-9290(91)90021-E ↗
46. Static coefficient of friction between Ti–6Al–4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants10.1002/jbm.1233 ↗
47. Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.008 ↗
48. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802ba491 ↗
49. Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem–cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.025 ↗
50. Contact between deformable solids: the fully coupled approach10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00115-0 ↗
51. Mixed-mode fracture toughness of the cobalt-chromium alloy/polymethylmethacrylate cement interface10.1002/jor.1100170305 ↗
52. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry10.2106/00004623-200204000-00012 ↗
53. The mechanism of loosening in cemented hip prostheses determined from long-term results10.1007/BF00434099 ↗
54. The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.0810273 ↗
55. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size10.2106/00004623-200401000-00016 ↗
56. Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement–bone interface10.3109/17453670902967265 ↗
57. In vitro measurement of interface micromotion and crack in cemented total hip arthroplasty systems with different surface roughness10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.08.008 ↗
58. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and ‘taper-lock’in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00085-9 ↗
59. The behavior of the micro-mechanical cement–bone interface affects the cement failure in total hip replacement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.020 ↗
60. In vitro fatigue crack analysis of the Lubinus SPII cemented hip stem10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.018 ↗
61. Fatigue debonding of the roughened stem–cement interface: effects of surface roughness and stem heating conditions10.1002/jbm.b.30470 ↗
62. Investigation of the fracture characteristics of the interfacial bond between bone and cement: experimental and finite element approaches10.1007/s12206-010-0401-9 ↗