journal article·2019-09-02Open access

Sex Differences in the Footprint Analysis During the Entire Gait Cycle in a Functional Equinus Condition: Novel Cross Sectional Research

Eva María Martínez-Jiménez, Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa-Vallejo, Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias, José Ignacio Díaz-Velázquez, Israel Casado-Hernández, Cesar Calvo-Lobo, Daniel López-López, David Rodríguez-Sanz

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 17

Abstract

Some studies suggest that gender is related to gait. Females show significantly higher ankle motion and vertical ground reaction forces. Males have significantly larger plantar contact surface areas in all regions of the foot than females in most, but not all, prior studies. However, there is no research on sex differences in a functional equinus condition. In this study, 119 individuals, including 59 females (29.7 ± 5.15 years, 58.74 ± 6.66 kg, 163.65 ± 5.58 cm) and 60 males (31.22 ± 6.06 years, 75.67 ± 9.81 kg, 177.10 ± 6.16 cm), with a functional equinus condition walked onto a pressure platform. In two separate testing sessions, five trials of each foot were conducted for the first, second, and third steps. We measured the contact surface areas for each of the three phases of the stance phase. We computed the intraclass correlation coefficient and standard error of the mean to assess the reliability. We found significantly greater contact surface areas in males than females in the first, second, and third steps in all phases of the stance phase: heel strike, mid-stance, and take-off. This is important information for the design of footwear and orthotics and gender knowledge. In a functional equinus condition, males have registered greater contact surface areas than females in all phases of the dynamic footprint of the stance phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain

Departament of Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Premium Madrid, 28017 Madrid, Spain

Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, 15403 Ferrol, Spain

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Geometric morphometric footprint analysis of young women10.1186/1757-1146-6-27 ↗
2. Relative foot size and shape to general body size in Javanese, Filipinas and Japanese with special reference to habitual footwear types10.1080/03014469700004862 ↗
3. A new approach to children’s footwear based on foot type classification10.1080/00140130902803549 ↗
4. Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups10.1520/JFS14097J ↗
5. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: A proof of concept study10.1186/s13047-018-0251-8 ↗
6. The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes10.1016/j.jsams.2007.05.005 ↗
7. Lower extremity biomechanics differ in prepubescent and postpubescent female athletes during stride jump landings10.1123/jab.19.2.139 ↗
8. Foot pressure differences in men and women10.1016/j.fas.2009.03.005 ↗
9. Foot Biometrics Gender Differences in Plantar Pressure Distribution in Standing Position
10. Foot Structure and in Shoe Plantar Pressure Differences Between Males and Females10.1097/00005768-199905001-00518 ↗
11. Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: A biomechanical analysis10.1038/sj.ijo.0801785 ↗
12. Dynamic footprint-based person recognition method using a hidden markov model and a neural network10.1002/int.20040 ↗
13. Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects10.7547/87507315-84-10-499 ↗
14. Isolated gastrocnemius tightness10.2106/00004623-200206000-00010 ↗
15. Gastrocnemius recession in the treatment of nonspastic ankle equinus: A retrospective study10.7547/87507315-79-4-159 ↗
16. Ankle equinus. Prevalence and linkage to common foot pathology10.7547/87507315-85-6-295 ↗
17. Gastrocnemius soleus recession: A simpler, more limited approach10.7547/0950018 ↗
18. Williams, A. (2007). Footwear assessment and management. Podiatry Manag., 165–176.
19. Clinical assessment of ankle joint dorsiflexion: A review of measurement techniques10.7547/1010059 ↗
20. Biomechanics of the first ray part V: The effect of equinus deformity: A 3-dimensional kinematic study on a cadaver model10.1053/j.jfas.2005.01.003 ↗
21. Plantar Pressures in Children With and Without Sever’s Disease
22. Ankle Equinus
23. Comparison of the Reliability of Plantar Pressure Measurements Using the Two-step and Midgait Methods of Data Collection10.1177/107110079902001006 ↗
24. Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods10.7547/87507315-89-10-495 ↗
25. Effect of the cushioning running shoes in ground contact time of phases of gait10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.032 ↗
26. Investigation of gait protocols for plantar pressure measurement of non-pathological subjects using a dynamic pedobarograph10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01095-8 ↗
27. Skin temperature in youth soccer players with functional equinus and non-equinus condition after running10.1111/jdv.14966 ↗
28. The Effect of Gender, Age, and Lateral Dominance on Arch Height and Arch Stiffness10.1177/107110070602700509 ↗
29. Reproducibility of gait analysis variables: One-step versus three-step method of data acquisition10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80016-3 ↗
30. A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.05.004 ↗
31. Martínez-Jiménez, E.M., Losa-Iglesias, M.E., Díaz-Velázquez, J.I., Becerrro-De- Bengoa-Vallejo, R., Palomo-López, P., Clavo-Lobo, C., López-López, D., and Rodríguez-Sanz, D. (2019). Acute Effects of Intermittent Versus Continuous Bilateral Ankle Plantar Flexor Static Stretching on Postural Sway and Plantar Pressures: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin. Med., 8.10.3390/jcm8010052 ↗
32. Comparison of the two-step and midgait methods of plantar pressure measurement in children
33. Plantar Preassure distribution measurements. Technical background and clinical applications10.1046/j.1460-9584.1997.00043.x ↗
34. Velocity of the center of pressure during walking10.7547/87507315-90-7-334 ↗
35. Reliability: What is it and how is measured?10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61211-4 ↗
36. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data10.2307/2529310 ↗
37. Gender differences in adult foot shape: Implications for shoe design10.1097/00005768-200104000-00015 ↗
38. Efficacy of Plantar Loading Parameters During Gait in Terms of Reliability, Variability, Effect of Gender and Relationship Between Contact Area and Plantar Pressure10.1177/107110070502600210 ↗
39. Differences in men’s and women’s mean ankle ligamentous laxity
40. The influence of walking speed on plantar pressure measurements using the two-step gait initiation protocol10.1016/j.foot.2003.09.004 ↗
41. Michaud, T. (1993). Foot Orthoses and Other Forms of Conservative Foot Care, Williams and Wilkins. [2nd ed.].
42. Marcha: Descripcion, métodos, herramientas de evaluación y parámetros de normalidad reportados en la literatura. Gait: Decription, methods, assesment tolos and normality parameters reported in the literatura
43. A motor programme for the initiation of forward-oriented movements in humans10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018616 ↗