A Comprehensive Study of Local, Global, and Combined Optimization Methods on Synthetic Seismic Refraction and Direct Current Resistivity Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Most geophysical inversions face the problem of non-uniqueness, which poses a challenge in the mapping and delineation of the subsurface anomalies. To tackle this challenge, a combined local and global optimization approach is considered for jointly inverting two-dimensional direct current resistivity (DCR) and seismic refraction (SR) data that aim to estimate the corresponding physical model parameters. In this combined approach, the output of the local optimization method is used to determine the search space and tuning parameters for the global optimization algorithm. The multi-objective genetic algorithm (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm) was utilized to jointly optimize the objective functions of two different methods. Because the genetic algorithm is a population-based optimization method, it requires numerous forward calculations. To deal with the expected high computational cost associated with this approach, parallel computing was utilized for the forward function evaluations to reduce the run time of the entire process. The proposed approach was tested using synthetic two-dimensional resistivity and velocity models that had three different types of anomalies (dyke, positive, and combined positive and negative). The results showed an improvement in the anomaly delineation in the output of the combined local and global optimization method compared with the local optimization method. Additionally, similar synthetic models were tested using only the single objective global optimization algorithm (conventional global optimization), which showed promising anomaly delineation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geosciences, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
Department of Geophysical Engineering, Ankara University, Gölbaşı 06830, Turkey
Department of Applied Physics & Astronomy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
Funding
College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences (CPG) at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM).
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06717.x ↗
2. Oldenburg, D.W., and Li, Y. (2005). Inversion for Applied Geophysics: A Tutorial. Near-Surface Geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch5 ↗
3. A comparison of automatic techniques for estimating the regularization parameter in non-linear inverse problems10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02190.x ↗
4. Shaping regularization in geophysical-estimation problems10.1190/1.2433716 ↗
5. A local-order regularization for geophysical inverse problems10.1093/gji/ggt308 ↗
6. Characterization of the bridge pillar foundations using 3d focusing inversion of DC resistivity data10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103875 ↗
7. Joint inversion: A structural approach10.1088/0266-5611/13/1/006 ↗
8. Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data10.1029/2003GL017370 ↗
9. Joint two-dimensional cross-gradient imaging of magnetotelluric and seismic traveltime data for structural and lithological classification10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03366.x ↗
10. Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground-penetrating radar traveltime data10.1029/2006WR005131 ↗
11. Lithological classification assisted by the joint inversion of electrical and seismic data at a control site in northeast Mexico10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.11.003 ↗
12. A framework for 3-D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04856.x ↗
13. Joint inversion of 2D resistivity and seismic travel time data to image saltwater intrusion over karstic areas10.1007/s12665-012-1875-9 ↗
14. Joint Inversion of Seismic and Magnetotelluric Data in the Parkfield Region of California Using the Normalized Cross-Gradient Constraint10.1007/s00024-014-1002-9 ↗
15. Two dimensional joint inversion of direct current resistivity, radio-magnetotelluric and seismic refraction data: An application from Bafra Plain, Turkey10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.03.002 ↗
16. Two-dimensional joint inversion of Magnetotelluric and local earthquake data: Discussion on the contribution to the solution of deep subsurface structures10.1016/j.pepi.2018.01.006 ↗
17. 2D joint inversion of CSAMT and magnetic data based on cross-gradient theory10.1007/s11770-017-0615-z ↗
18. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb06462.x ↗
19. Combining electromagnetic measurements in the Mygdonian sedimentary basin, Greece10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.10.014 ↗
20. Determination and Evaluation of Saltwater Intrusion on Bafra Plain: Joint Interpretation of Geophysical, Hydrogeological and Hydrochemical Data10.1007/s00024-020-02573-2 ↗
21. Seawater intrusion imaging at Tybaki, Crete, using geophysical data and joint inversion of electrical and seismic data10.3997/1365-2397.32.8.76970 ↗
22. Geophysical investigations at the Istron archaeological site, eastern Crete, Greece using seismic refraction and electrical resistivity tomography10.1088/1742-2132/9/6/749 ↗
23. Linde, N., and Doetsch, J. (2016). Joint Inversion in Hydrogeophysics and Near-Surface Geophysics. Integrated Imaging of the Earth: Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118929063.ch7 ↗
24. Meju, M.A. (2011, January 10–13). Joint multi-geophysical inversion: Effective model integration, challenges and directions for future research. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Gravity, Electrical & Magnetic Methods and Their Applications, Beijing, China.10.1190/1.3659078 ↗
25. Combined weighted inversion of electrical resistivity data arising from different array types10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.09.003 ↗
26. Joint electromagnetic and seismic inversion using structural constraints10.1190/1.3246586 ↗
27. 2D joint inversion of RMT and ERT data versus individual 3D inversion of full tensor RMT data: An example from Trecate site in Italy10.1190/geo2011-0525.1 ↗
28. Robust geophysical integration through structure-coupled joint inversion and multispectral fusion of seismic reflection, magnetotelluric, magnetic, and gravity images: Example from Santos Basin, offshore Brazil10.1190/geo2011-0394.1 ↗
29. Structure-coupled joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data10.1190/geo2012-0460.1 ↗
30. Approach on Joint Inversion of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Data Based on Structural Constraints10.1109/TGRS.2020.2983081 ↗
31. Yin, C., Sun, S., Liu, Y., Ren, X., and Wang, C. (2019, January 21–24). Joint inversion of geophysical data and applications. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Engineering Geophysics, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
32. Structural joint inversion on irregular meshes10.1093/gji/ggz550 ↗
33. Particle swarm optimization inversion of magnetic data: Field examples from iron ore deposits in China10.1190/geo2017-0456.1 ↗
34. Monitoring time evolution of self-potential anomaly sources by a new global optimization approach. Application to organic contaminant transport10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.093 ↗
35. Applications of hybrid genetic algorithms in seismic tomography10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.08.005 ↗
36. Extraction of structure-based geoelectric models by hybrid genetic algorithms10.1190/1.3273851 ↗
37. Hybrid optimization methods for geophysical inversion10.1190/1.1444220 ↗
38. Two-dimensional inversion of direct current resistivity data using a parallel, multi-objective genetic algorithm10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02702.x ↗
39. Inversion of marine controlled source electromagnetic data using a parallel non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm10.1093/gji/ggz501 ↗
40. Joint parameter estimation from magnetic resonance and vertical electric soundings using a multi-objective genetic algorithm10.1111/1365-2478.12082 ↗
41. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Sytems; An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, Bradford Book.10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 ↗
42. Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
43. Sen, M.K., and Stoffa, P.L. (2013). Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511997570 ↗
44. A Pareto Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Anisotropic Shale Models10.1029/2020JB021476 ↗
45. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
46. Numerical treatment and evaluation of inverse problems
47. Nonlinear 3-D traveltime inversion of crosshole data with an application in the area of the Middle Ural mountains10.1190/1.1444953 ↗
48. Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104069 ↗