journal article·2021-12-15Open access

Effect Mechanism of Connection Joints in Fabricated Station Structures

Huafei He, Zhaoping Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

The seismic response of a fabricated subway station is a complex structural connection problem that depends on the mechanical properties of the joints. In order to obtain the optimal joint distribution of a fabricated station structure under earthquake action, three finite element models of a single ring structure of fabricated subway stations assembled with seven, five, and four prefabricated components were proposed. Seismic wave characteristics, peak acceleration, and coupled horizontal and vertical seismic components were considered to study the seismic response of the fabricated subway station structure with different forms of the joint distribution. The dynamic time history method was used to analyze the seismic response in three aspects: structure plastic strain, interlayer relative deformation, and internal force. The damage indexes and residual strength indexes of the joints were offered based on the concrete damage index to evaluate the joints’ damage degree. The results showed that the joints of the vault or bottom plate had little influence on the seismic response of the fabricated station structure. The sidewall joints had the obvious seismic response and the most severe damage under horizontal ground motion or coupled ground motion, which were the weak joints of the fabricated station structure. The existence of vertical ground motion aggravated the damage degree of sidewall joints, making the damage occurrence time of sidewall joints earlier and the damage end time extended. On the premise of meeting the mechanical load and site requirements, an assembly scheme with fewer prefabricated components can be selected.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Cai, X., Yang, C., and Yuan, Y. (2020). Hybrid Simulation of Seismic Responses of a Typical Station with a Reinforced Concrete Column. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041331 ↗
2. Chen, Z., Wu, J., and Liu, H. (2019). Seismic Behavior of Steel Plate-Concrete Shear Walls with Holes. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9235255 ↗
3. Han, S.W., and Jee, H.W. (2020). A Numerical Model for Simulating Ground Motions for the Korean Peninsula. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041254 ↗
4. Lu, X., Cheng, Q., Xu, Z., Xu, Y., and Sun, C. (2019). Real-Time City-Scale Time-History Analysis and Its Application in Resilience-Oriented Earthquake Emergency Responses. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173497 ↗
5. Huh, J., Tran, Q.H., Haldar, A., Park, I., and Ahn, J. (2017). Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Shallow Two-Story Underground RC Box Structure. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070735 ↗
6. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7 ↗
7. Kawajima, K. (1994). Seismic Design of Underground Structure, Kajima Institute Publishing.
8. Seismic performance upgrading for underground structures by introducing sliding isolation bearings10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.007 ↗
9. Seismic performance and failure mechanism of a subway station based on nonlinear finite element analysis
10. A plastic-damage model for concrete10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of damage evolution of Daikai station during the 1995 Kobe earthquake10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110180 ↗
12. Seismic Performance of underground Shallow Subway Stations in Soft Soil
13. Numerical study on the response of ground movements to construction activities of a metro station using the pile-beam-arch method10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.014 ↗
14. Optimum pattern of ground improvement for enhancing seismic resistance of existing box culvert buried in soft ground10.1016/j.tust.2017.06.022 ↗
15. Structural components functionalities and failure mechanism of rectangular underground structures during earthquakes10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.017 ↗
16. Comparative numerical analysis on dynamic effects of underground large scale frame structures under seismic waves10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.012 ↗
17. Isolation mechanism of a subway station structure with flexible devices at column ends obtained in shaking-table tests10.1016/j.tust.2020.103328 ↗
18. Failure of double friction pendulum bearings under pulse-type motions10.1002/eqe.2827 ↗
19. A review of rolling-type seismic isolation: Historical development and future directions10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.031 ↗
20. A model of triple friction pendulum bearing for general geometric and frictional parameters10.1002/eqe.2738 ↗
21. Tsai, C.S., Lin, Y.C., and Chen, W.S. (2006, January 23–27). Seismic Behavior of High-Tech Facility Isolated With a Trench Friction Pendulum System. Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping/ICPVT-11 Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93474 ↗
22. Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-3 ↗
23. Influence of non-associated flow rule on passive face instability for shallow shield tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2021.104202 ↗
24. Analytical algorithm for longitudinal deformation profile of a deep tunnel10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.01.012 ↗
25. Challenges and countermeasures for using pile-beam-arch approach to enlarge large-diameter shield tunnel to subway station10.1016/j.tust.2020.103326 ↗
26. Experimental investigation of mechanical characteristics for linings of twins tunnels with asymmetric cross-section10.1016/j.tust.2021.104209 ↗
27. Effects of twin tunnels construction beneath existing shield-driven twin tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2014.10.001 ↗
28. Prefabrication technology for underground metro station structure10.1016/j.tust.2020.103717 ↗
29. An experiment Study on the evolution law of concrete structure crack and joint seam deformation for tenon groove joints in the prefabricated metro station
30. Experimental study on flexural mechanical properties of the double tenon groove joints of prefabricated subway station
31. Three-dimensional dynamic response analysis of a single-ring structure in a prefabricated subway station10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.010 ↗
32. Shaking table test on seismic response characteristics of prefabricated subway station structure10.1016/j.tust.2019.102994 ↗
33. Comparative study of the seismic performance of prefabricated and cast-in-place subway station structures by shaking table test10.1016/j.tust.2020.103583 ↗
34. 3-D numerical analysis on seismic responses of the underground large scale frame structure under near-fault ground motions10.1016/j.tust.2019.103020 ↗
35. 3D viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain10.1007/s11803-006-0585-2 ↗
36. A generalized response spectrum method for seismic response analysis of underground structure combined with viscous-spring artificial boundary10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106451 ↗
37. Method and realization of seismic motion input of viscous-spring boundary
38. Island, R. (2021, December 12). Version ABAQUS. 6.14 Document; USA, 2014. Available online: http://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.14/.
39. Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling10.1007/s10518-015-9790-6 ↗
40. Time-domain soil–structure interaction analysis in two-dimensional medium based on analytical frequency-dependent infinite elements10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000310)47:7<1241::AID-NME807>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
41. Soil-structure-interaction analysis in time domain10.1016/0029-5493(89)90249-5 ↗
42. Mechanical Property of Tenon-Groove Joints for Metro Station Constructed by Prefabricated Structure
43. Load Transfer Mechanisms between Underground Structure and Surrounding Ground: Evaluation of the Failure of the Daikai Station10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1522) ↗
44. Numerical Investigation of Closed-Form Solutions for Seismic Design of a Circular Tunnel Lining (by Quasi-Static Method)10.28991/cej-030983 ↗
45. Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K., and Lin, C.H. (2021, December 12). EERA—A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits; 2000. Available online: https://www.worldcat.org/title/eera-a-computer-program-for-equivalent-linear-earthquake-site-response-analyses-of-layered-soil-deposits/oclc/45142158.
46. Numerical research on seismic response characteristics of shallow buried rectangular underground structure10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.030 ↗
47. Selection of Rayleigh Damping Coefficients for Seismic Response Analysis of Soil Layers
48. Time-domain viscoelastic analysis of earth structures10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200006)29:6<745::AID-EQE937>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
49. Seismic response analysis of assembled monolithic subway station in the transverse direction10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110970 ↗
50. Centrifuge model study on the seismic responses of shield tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2019.103036 ↗
51. Effect of vertical ground motions and overburden depth on the seismic responses of large underground structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110073 ↗
52. Improved pushover method for seismic analysis of shallow buried underground rectangular frame structure10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106363 ↗
53. Lu, Q.R., Wang, Z.L., Gao, J.H., and Chang, Y. (2017, January 29–30). Influence of seismic parameters on the performance of underground structures. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection, Zhuhai, China.10.2991/iceep-17.2017.17 ↗
54. Analysis of common cause failure effect on system reliability in seismic PSA10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.04.020 ↗
55. Fu, J.Q., Wang, R., and Zhou, Q.G. (2020, January 12–13). Based on ArcGIS Interpolation Method of Drawing Peak Acceleration Zoning Map. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, Hangzhou, China.
56. Seismic damage indices for RC buildings: Evaluation of concepts and procedures10.1002/pse.2260010113 ↗