journal article·2021-11-06Open access

Digital Eco-Design and Life Cycle Assessment—Key Elements in a Circular Economy: A Case Study of a Conventional Desk

Eduardo Martínez-Cámara, Jacinto Santamaría, Félix Sanz-Adán, David Arancón

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 21

Abstract

In recent times, there has been an indisputable need to move towards a more sustainable economy, known as a circular economy, which is basically aimed at reducing the consumption of newly extracted raw materials to manufacture products, and thus, reduces waste generation by recycling products beyond their useful life to ultimately close the economic flow of the product. For the economy generated by products to close the circle, it is essential to tackle the problem at the source, that is, the process to achieve the desired product should be conducted by designing the product with environmental criteria (eco-design) and analysing its life cycle from the extraction process to the point when it ends its useful life (LCA). This article presents an ECO + LCA methodology that provides designers with an easy way of visualising the effect of their design decisions on the final environmental impact of the product. This methodology was tested on a case study of a conventional desk, with four alternative scenarios presented and an assessment of their final impact with a cradle-to-grave perspective. The final design obtained reduces the environmental impact by more than 30% and reduces costs by more than 11%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Sustainable Industrial Ecology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 ↗
2. Barriers to Transitioning Towards Smart Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review10.1007/978-981-16-6128-0_24 ↗
3. Circular economy: Advancement of European Union countries
4. Mapping and assessing indicator-based frameworks for monitoring circular economy development at the city-level10.1016/j.scs.2021.103378 ↗
5. Evaluating the transition to the circular economy in the agri-food sector: Selection of indicators10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105916 ↗
6. Structural Pavement Rehabilitation with Recycled Materials in a Circular Economy Approach10.1007/978-3-030-77230-7_23 ↗
7. Lean Green Production Management Model Under a Circular Economy Approach for Reducing Variable Costs at a Small Plastics Business10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_86 ↗
8. Circular economy of façades: Real-world challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105827 ↗
9. Circular economy is game-changing municipal wastewater treatment technology towards energy and carbon neutrality10.1016/j.cej.2021.132114 ↗
10. Integration of swine manure anaerobic digestion and digestate nutrients removal/recovery under a circular economy concept10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113825 ↗
11. Comparative LCA of concrete with recycled aggregates: A circular economy mindset in Europe10.1007/s11367-020-01798-6 ↗
12. COVID-19 and industrial waste mitigation via thermochemical technologies towards a circular economy: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127215 ↗
13. Circular economy approach in solid waste management system to achieve UN-SDGs: Solutions for post-COVID recovery10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149605 ↗
14. COVID-19 Creating another problem? Sustainable solution for PPE disposal through LCA approach10.1007/s10668-020-01033-0 ↗
15. Commission of European Communities (2021, October 20). Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy; Communication No. 614; (COM (2015), 614). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7-01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
16. ISO (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006), SIS.
17. ISO (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (ISO 14044:2006), SIS.
18. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: A practitioners perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002 ↗
19. Dealing with the eco-design paradox in research and development projects: The concept of sustainability assessment levels10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125232 ↗
20. Smart circular product design strategies towards eco-effective production systems: A lean eco-design industry 4.0 framework10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128847 ↗
21. Combination of product environmental footprint method and eco-design process according to ISO 14006: The case of an Italian vinery10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149507 ↗
22. Eco-modulation as a driver for eco-design: A dynamic view of the French collective EPR scheme10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125714 ↗
23. Circular economy transition: Exploiting innovative eco-design capabilities and customer involvement10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128858 ↗
24. Individualized and accurate eco-design knowledge push for designers: A CAD-based feedback knowledge push method for the eco-design10.1177/1063293X20985539 ↗
25. Agricultural eco-design scenarios based on AGRIBALYSE® residual organic fertiliser inventories10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128506 ↗
26. Eco product development combining eco design and life cycle assessment10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0160 ↗
27. Corsi, I., Bellingeri, A., Eliso, M.C., Grassi, G., Liberatori, G., Murano, C., Sturba, L., Vannuccini, M.L., and Bergami, E. (2021). Eco-interactions of engineered nanomaterials in the marine environment: Towards an eco-design framework. Nanomaterials, 11.10.3390/nano11081903 ↗
28. Eco-design of spirulina solar cultivation: Key aspects to reduce environmental impacts using Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126741 ↗
29. Longo, S., Cellura, M., Cusenza, M.A., Guarino, F., Mistretta, M., Panno, D., D’urso, C., Leonardi, S.G., Briguglio, N., and Tumminia, G. (2021). Life cycle assessment for supporting eco-design: The case study of sodium–nickel chloride cells. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14071897 ↗
30. Eco-design for dye solar cells: From hazardous waste to profitable recovery10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128743 ↗
31. Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium-ion battery production10.1007/s11367-021-01976-0 ↗
32. Duđak, L., Milisavljević, S., Jocanović, M., Kiss, F., Šević, D., Karanović, V., and Orošnjak, M. (2021). Life cycle assessment of different waste lubrication oil management options in Serbia. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146652 ↗
33. Ferrara, C., De Feo, G., and Picone, V. (2021). Lca of glass versus pet mineral water bottles: An italian case study. Recycling, 6.10.3390/recycling6030050 ↗
34. Life cycle assessment of bacterial cellulose production10.1007/s11367-021-01904-2 ↗
35. A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas, and diesel buses in Thailand10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128013 ↗
36. Life cycle assessment of underground coal mining in China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150231 ↗
37. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic
38. Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.020 ↗
39. Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies10.1016/j.renene.2005.03.002 ↗
40. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.013 ↗
41. Renewable electricity generation for off grid remote communities; Life Cycle Assessment Study in Alaska, USA10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117325 ↗
42. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 ↗
43. Recycled versus non-recycled insulation alternatives: LCA analysis for different climatic conditions in Spain10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105838 ↗
44. A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.016 ↗
45. Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.004 ↗
46. Guinée, J.B., and Lindeijer, E. (2002). Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/BF02978897 ↗
47. Goedkoop, M.J. (1999). The Eco-Indicator 99 a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Pre Concultants.
48. Huijbregts, M.A., Steinmann, Z.J., Elshout, P.M., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Hollander, A., Zijp, M., and van Zelm, R. (2016). ReCiPe 2016: A Harmonized Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Midpoint and Endpoint Level, Report I: Characterization; RIVM Report 2016-0104.10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y ↗
49. Green BIM—How Building Information Modeling is contributing to green design and construction
50. Policies for green design. J. Environ
51. Sustainable consumption and production for Asia: Sustainability through green design and practice10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.015 ↗
52. Pre Concultants (2021, September 14). SimaPro Software. Available online: https://pre-sustainability.com/solutions/tools/simapro.
53. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework10.1065/lca2004.10.181.1 ↗