journal article·2021-09-18Open access

Evaluating the Seismic Capacity of Dry-Joint Masonry Arch Structures via the Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method

Wangpeng Li, Xudong Chen, Hongfan Wang, Andrew H. C. Chan, Yingyao Cheng

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 18

Abstract

The behaviour of dry-joint masonry arch structures is highly nonlinear and discontinuous since they are composed of individual discrete blocks. These structures are vulnerable to seismic excitations. It is difficult for traditional methods like the standard finite element method (FEM) to simulate masonry failure due to their intrinsic limitations. An advanced computational approach, i.e., the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM), was employed in this study to examine the first-order seismic capacity of masonry arches and buttressed arches with different shapes subjected to gravity and constant horizontal acceleration. Within the framework of the FDEM, masonry blocks are discretised into discrete elements. A finite element formulation is implemented into each discrete element, providing accurate predictions of the deformation of each block and contact interactions between blocks. Numerical examples are presented and validated with results from the existing literature, demonstrating that the FDEM is capable of capturing the seismic capacities and hinge locations of masonry arch structures. Further simulations on geometric parameters and friction coefficient of masonry buttressed arches were conducted, and their influences on the seismic capacities are revealed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Building materials and conservation · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215011, China

Department of Civil Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA

School of Engineering, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China · Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province

References (49)

Show source-provided references
2. The masonry arch as a four-link mechanism under base motion10.1002/eqe.4290211105 ↗
4. Clemente, P., and Raithel, A. (2020). The mechanism model in the seismic check of stone arches. Arch Bridges, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003078494-18 ↗
5. Strength capacity of a No-Tension portal arch-frame under combined seismic and ash loads10.1016/S0377-0273(03)00408-6 ↗
6. Failure of masonry arches under impulse base motion10.1002/eqe.719 ↗
7. Experimental assessment of in-plane behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.084 ↗
8. Shaking table tests and numerical analyses on a scaled dry-joint arch undergoing windowed sine pulses10.1007/s10518-017-0156-0 ↗
9. Dry Stone Masonry Walls in Bending—Part I: Static Tests10.1080/15583058.2012.663059 ↗
10. A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.003 ↗
11. A fibre beam-based approach for the evaluation of the seismic capacity of masonry arches10.1002/eqe.2416 ↗
12. Bencardino, F., Nisticò, M., and Verre, S. (2020). Experimental Investigation and Numerical Analysis of Bond Behavior in SRG-Strengthened Masonry Prisms Using UHTSS and Stainless-Steel Fibers. Fibers, 8.10.3390/fib8020008 ↗
13. Modelling of historical masonry structures: Comparison of different approaches through a case study10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00033-0 ↗
14. Discontinuous modelling of masonry bridges10.1007/s00466-002-0393-0 ↗
15. Discrete element analysis of a stone masonry arch10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.01.001 ↗
16. Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.018 ↗
17. A parametric investigation of the seismic capacity for masonry arches and portals of different shapes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.021 ↗
18. DEM modeling and experimental analysis of the static behavior of a dry-joints masonry cross vaults10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.202 ↗
19. DEM numerical approach for masonry aqueducts in seismic zone: Two valuable Portuguese examples10.1504/IJMRI.2017.082392 ↗
20. Minimum thickness of semi-circular skewed masonry arches10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.036 ↗
21. Comparison of in-plane and out-of-plane failure modes of masonry arch bridges using discontinuum analysis10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.016 ↗
22. Gonen, S., Pulatsu, B., Erdogmus, E., Karaesmen, E., and Karaesmen, E. (2021). Quasi-Static Nonlinear Seismic Assessment of a Fourth Century, A.D. Roman Aqueduct in Istanbul, Turkey. Heritage, 4.10.3390/heritage4010025 ↗
23. Funari, M.F., Mehrotra, A., and Lourenço, P.B. (2021). A Tool for the Rapid Seismic Assessment of Historic Masonry Structures Based on Limit Analysis Optimisation and Rocking Dynamics. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11030942 ↗
24. Munjiza, A. (1992). Discrete Elements in Transient Dynamics of Fractured Media. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales].
25. NBS contact detection algorithm for bodies of similar size10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980915)43:1<131::AID-NME447>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
26. Combined single and smeared crack model in combined finite-discrete element analysis10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990110)44:1<41::AID-NME487>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
27. Mesh size sensitivity of the combined FEM/DEM fracture and fragmentation algorithms10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00090-X ↗
28. Munjiza, A. (2004). The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method, John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/0470020180 ↗
29. Munjiza, A.A., Knight, E.E., and Rougier, E. (2011). Computational Mechanics of Discontinua, John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781119971160 ↗
30. Munjiza, A., Rougier, E., and Knight, E.E. (2015). Large Strain Finite Element Method: A Practical Course, John Wiley and Sons.
31. Modelling impact fracture and fragmentation of laminated glass using the combined finite-discrete element method10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.007 ↗
32. Soft impact responses of laminated glass simulated with the combined finite-discrete element method10.1108/EC-10-2017-0386 ↗
33. Fracture and fragmentation of thin shells using the combined finite-discrete element method10.1002/nme.4511 ↗
34. Chen, X., and Wang, H. (2019). Slope Failure of Noncohesive Media Modelled with the Combined Finite–Discrete Element Method. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9030579 ↗
35. Sensitivity analysis of fracture energies for the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107793 ↗
36. Structural applications of the combined finite–discrete element method10.1007/s40571-019-00286-5 ↗
37. A combined finite-discrete element analysis of dry stone masonry structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.010 ↗
38. A finite-discrete element model for dry stone masonry structures strengthened with steel clamps and bolts10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.004 ↗
39. A combined finite–discrete numerical model for analysis of masonry structures10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.02.006 ↗
40. Numerical analysis of 3D dry-stone masonry structures by combined finite-discrete element method
41. Seismic resistance of dry stone arches under in-plane seismic loading10.12989/sem.2016.58.2.243 ↗
42. Dynamic failure of dry-joint masonry arch structures modelled with the combined finite–discrete element method10.1007/s40571-019-00297-2 ↗
43. Collapse simulation of masonry arches induced by spreading supports with the combined finite–discrete element method10.1007/s40571-020-00366-x ↗
44. Simulating the failure of masonry walls subjected to support settlement with the combined finite-discrete element method10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102558 ↗
45. Munjiza, A. (2021, September 10). Manual for the “y” fem/dem Computer Program, Available online: https://www.geogroup.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/YManual.pdf.
46. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures10.1080/15583050601176868 ↗
47. A unifying computational approach for the lower-bound limit analysis of systems of masonry arches and buttresses10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110999 ↗
48. Hinging Mechanisms of Masonry Single-Nave Barrel Vaults Subjected to Lateral and Gravity Loads10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001762 ↗
49. Pulatsu, B., Erdogmus, E., Bretas, E.M., and Lourenço, P.B. (2019, January 3–6). In-Plane Static Response of Dry-Joint Masonry Arch-Pier Structures. Proceedings of the AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions—The National Agenda AEI 2019 Conference, Tysons, VA, USA.10.1061/9780784482261.028 ↗