Show source-provided references
3. Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: A systematic review
10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003456 ↗4. Remote Assessment of Post-Stroke Elbow Function Using Internet-Based Telerobotics: A Proof-of-Concept Study
10.3389/fneur.2020.583101 ↗5. Zhang, S., Fu, Q., Guo, S., and Fu, Y. (2019). A Telepresence System for Therapist-in-the-Loop Training for Elbow Joint Rehabilitation. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9081710 ↗8. Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: Promoting patient engagement in therapy
10.1007/s40141-014-0056-z ↗9. A Comparative Analysis of 2D and 3D Tasks for Virtual Reality Therapies Based on Robotic-Assisted Neurorehabilitation for Post-stroke Patients
10. Motricity index scores are valid indicators of paretic upper extremity strength following stroke
10.1589/jpts.11.59 ↗11. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): A Comparison With Other Measures Used to Evaluate Effects of Stroke and Rehabilitation
10.1093/ptj/83.7.617 ↗12. Development of a robotic device for post-stroke home tele-rehabilitation
13. Masia, L., Micera, S., Akay, M., and Pons, J.L. (2019). Evaluation of an Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Robotic Device for Home Use from Patient Perspective. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III, Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0 ↗14. (2021, July 01). iDRhA. Available online: https://idrha.es/.
15. da Silva, L.D., Pereira, T.F., Leithardt, V.R., Seman, L.O., and Zeferino, C.A. (2020). Hybrid Impedance-Admittance Control for Upper Limb Exoskeleton using Electromyography. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10207146 ↗16. Usability Evaluation in Industry
17. Likert, R. (1974). A Method of Constructing an ATTITUDE Scale, Aldine Publishing.
18. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale
20. Evaluation of Patient Motivation and Satisfaction During Technology-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Experiential Review
10.1089/g4h.2020.0024 ↗21. Effects of Different Opponent Types on Motivation and Exercise Intensity in a Competitive Arm Exercise Game
10.1089/g4h.2019.0028 ↗22. Goršič, M., Cikajlo, I., Goljar, N., and Novak, D. (2017). A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 14.
10.1186/s12984-017-0336-9 ↗23. Goršič, M., Cikajlo, I., and Novak, D. (2017). Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person: Effects on motivation and exercise intensity. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 23.
10.1186/s12984-017-0231-4 ↗24. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis
10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413 ↗25. Darzi, A., and Novak, D. (2019, January 24–28). Using Physiological Linkage for Patient State Assessment In a Competitive Rehabilitation Game. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.
10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779361 ↗26. Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Levin, M.F., Fung, J., and Archambault, P. (2013, January 26–29). Interactive virtual reality game-based rehabilitation for stroke patients. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), Philadelphia, PA, USA.
10.1109/ICVR.2013.6662126 ↗