Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Automatic Floor Plan Analysis Technology: An AHP-Based Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a technology that allows automatic extraction of vectorized indoor spatial information from raster images of floor plans. Automatic reconstruction of indoor spaces from floor plans is based on a deep learning algorithm, which trains on scanned floor plan images and extracts critical indoor elements such as room structures, junctions, walls, and openings. The newly developed technology proposed herein can handle complicated floor plans which could not be automatically extracted by previous studies because of its complexity and difficulty in being trained in deep learning. Such complicated reconstruction solely from a floor plan image can be digitized and vectorized either through manual drawing or with the help of newly developed deep learning-based automatic extraction. This study proposes an evaluation framework for assessing this newly developed technology against manual digitization. Using the analytical hierarchy process, the hierarchical aspects of technology value and their relative importance are systematically quantified. The analysis suggested that the automatic technology using a deep learning algorithm had predominant criteria followed by, substitutability, completeness, and supply and demand. In this study, the technology value of automatic floor plan analysis compared with that of traditional manual edits is compared systemically and assessed qualitatively, which had not been done in existing studies. Consequently, this study determines the effectiveness and usefulness of automatic floor plan analysis as a reasonable technology for acquiring indoor spatial information.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
Funding
This research was supported by a grant(21NSIP-B135746-05) from National Spatial Information Research Program (NSIP) funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu, D., Jin, P., Zhang, X., Du, J., and Yue, L. (2015). Extracting indoor spatial objects from CAD models: A database approach. Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Hanoi, Vietnam, 20–23 April 2015, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-22324-7_27 ↗
2. Jamali, A., Rahman, A.A., and Boguslawski, P. (2016, January 16–17). A hybrid 3D indoor space model. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W1, Istanbul, Turkey.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W1-75-2016 ↗
3. Jang, H., Yu, K., and Yang, J.H. (2020). Indoor reconstruction from floorplan images with a deep learning approach. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9020065 ↗
4. Review: Reconstruction of 3D building information models from 2D scanned plans10.1016/j.jobe.2015.04.002 ↗
5. Deep Floor Plan Analysis for Complicated Drawings Based on Style Transfer10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000942 ↗
6. Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.006 ↗
7. Macé, S., Valveny, E., Locteau, H., and Tabbone, S. (2010, January 9–11). A system to detect rooms in architectural floor plan images. Proceedings of the Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/1815330.1815352 ↗
8. Ahmed, S., Liwicki, M., Weber, M., and Dengel, A. (2011, January 18–21). Improved automatic analysis of architectural floor plans. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Beijing, China.10.1109/ICDAR.2011.177 ↗
9. Dodge, S., Xu, J., and Stenger, B. (2017, January 8–12). Parsing floor plan images. Proceedings of the 2017 Fifteenth IAPR International Conference on Machine Vision Applications (MVA), Nagoya, Japan.10.23919/MVA.2017.7986875 ↗
10. Liu, C., Wu, J., Kohli, P., and Furukawa, Y. (2017, January 22–29). Raster-to-Vector: Revisiting Floorplan Transformation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.241 ↗
11. (2021, April 01). Open EAIS. Available online: https://open.eais.go.kr/main/main.do.
12. Lizarralde, R., Ganzarain, J., and Zubizarreta, M. (2020). Assessment and selection of technologies for the sustainable development of an r&d center. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su122310087 ↗
13. Fiore, P., Sicignano, E., and Donnarumma, G. (2020). An ahp-based methodology for the evaluation and choice of integrated interventions on historic buildings. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12145795 ↗
14. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 ↗
15. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 ↗
16. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis—A hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0 ↗
17. Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.015 ↗
18. A hybrid selection model for emerging technology10.1016/j.techfore.2009.05.001 ↗
19. Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038 ↗
20. Application of AHP and Taguchi loss functions in evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies10.1007/s00170-012-4676-0 ↗
21. Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice10.1016/0377-2217(90)90280-O ↗
22. Use of AHP in decision-making for flexible manufacturing systems10.1108/17410380510626204 ↗
23. Decision making in construction management: AHP and expert choice approach10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.111 ↗
24. Application of fuzzy AHP for ranking and selection of alternatives in construction project management10.3846/13923730.2017.1388278 ↗
25. A fuzzy AHP model to assess sustainable performance of the construction industry from urban regeneration perspective
26. Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577) ↗
27. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction
28. (2021, April 01). KISTEP. Available online: https://www.kistep.re.kr/en/.
29. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
30. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (2005). Technology Valuation Program for R&D Result Diffusion, KISTEP.
31. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process
32. Saaty, T.L., and Vargas, L.G. (2013). The Logic of Priorities: Applications of Business, Energy, Health and Transportation, Springer Science & Business Media.
33. Saaty, T.L., and Kearns, K.P. (2014). Analytical Planning: The Organization of System, Elsevier.