Recent Advances in Myoelectric Control for Finger Prostheses for Multiple Finger Loss
Source abstract
Abstract
The loss of one or multiple fingers can lead to psychological problems as well as functional impairment. Various options exist for replacement and restoration after hand or finger loss. Prosthetic hand or finger prostheses improve esthetic outcomes and the quality of life for patients. Myoelectrically controlled hand prostheses have been used to attempt to produce different movements. The available articles (original research articles and review articles) on myoelectrically controlled finger/hand prostheses from January 1922 to February 2021 in English were reviewed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect resources. The articles were searched using the keywords “finger/hand loss”, “finger prosthesis”, “myoelectric control”, and “prostheses” and relevant articles were selected. Myoelectric or electromyography (EMG) signals are read by myoelectrodes and the signals are amplified, from which the muscle’s naturally generated electricity can be measured. The control of the myoelectric (prosthetic) hands or fingers is important for artificial hand or finger movement; however, the precise control of prosthetic hands or fingers remains a problem. Rehabilitation after multiple finger loss is challenging. Implants in finger prostheses after multiple finger loss offer better finger prosthesis retention. This article presents an overview of myoelectric control regarding finger prosthesis for patients with finger implants following multiple finger loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
Department of Prosthodontics, Fatima Jinnah Dental College, Karachi 74900, Pakistan
Department of Implantology, Ha Noi National Hospital of Odonto-stomatology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
VNU School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam
Maxillofacial Prosthetic Center, Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Mahidol University, Salaya 73170, Thailand
Department of Clinical Dentistry, Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Esthetic, functional, and prosthetic outcomes with implant-retained finger prostheses10.1177/0309364612449850 ↗
2. Implant-retained digital prostheses with custom-designed attachments: A clinical report10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.008 ↗
3. Osseointegrated finger prosthesis: An alternative method for finger reconstruction10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0086 ↗
4. Adhesive vs Implant Retained Fingers Prosthesis: A Comparative Study on Esthetic and Functional Outcome
5. Nepalese Esthetic Dental (NED) Proportion in Nepalese Population10.3126/kumj.v13i3.16816 ↗
6. Elective amputation and bionic substitution restore functional hand use after critical soft tissue injuries10.1038/srep34960 ↗
7. Integrating Digital Technologies in Dentistry to Enhance the Clinical Success
8. Advances in technology are changing the future of medicine10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.3.137 ↗
9. Data science, learning, and applications to biomedical and health sciences10.1111/nyas.13309 ↗
10. Avetisyan, A., Markaryan, M., Rokaya, D., Tovani-Palone, M.R., Zafar, M.S., Khurshid, Z., Vardanyan, A., and Heboyan, A. (2021). Characteristics of Periodontal Tissues in Prosthetic Treatment with Fixed Dental Prostheses. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26051331 ↗
11. A new externally powered, myoelectrically controlled prosthesis for persons with partial-hand amputations at the metacarpals10.1097/00008526-200106000-00009 ↗
12. Functional effectiveness of a myo-electric prosthesis compared with a functional split-hook prosthesis: A single subject experiment10.3109/03093648109145332 ↗
13. Abstract and proportional myoelectric control for multi-fingered hand prostheses10.1007/s10439-013-0876-5 ↗
14. Salem, F.H.A., Mohamed, K.S., Mohamed, S.B.K., and Gehani, A.A.E. (2013). The development of body-powered prosthetic hand controlled by EMG signals using DSP processor with virtual prosthesis implementation. Conf. Pap. Eng., 598945.10.1155/2013/598945 ↗
15. Independent long fingers are not essential for a grasping hand10.1038/srep35545 ↗
16. Combined influence of forearm orientation and muscular contraction on EMG pattern recognition10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.031 ↗
17. Characteristics of phantom upper limb mobility encourage phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control10.1038/s41598-018-33643-0 ↗
18. Selective activation of human finger muscles after stroke or amputation10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_30 ↗
19. Design and myoelectric control of an anthropomorphic prosthetic hand10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60377-3 ↗
20. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks applied to electromyography data: A resource for the classification of movements for prosthetic hands10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009 ↗
21. Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance10.1038/s41598-018-29503-6 ↗
22. Quantification of regenerative peripheral interface signal transmission10.1097/01.prs.0000421762.53265.54 ↗
23. Long-term stability of neural prosthetic control signals from silicon cortical arrays in rhesus macaque motor cortex10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/045005 ↗
24. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms10.1001/jama.2009.116 ↗
25. Control capabilities of myoelectric robotic prostheses by hand amputees: A scientific research and market overview
26. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2 ↗
27. Toward improved control of prosthetic fingers using surface electromyogram (EMG) signals10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.192 ↗
28. Isaković, M., Malešević, J., Keller, T., Kostić, M., and Štrbac, M. (2019). Optimization of semiautomated calibration algorithm of multichannel electrotactile feedback for myoelectric hand prosthesis. Appl. Bionics Biomech., 9298758.10.1155/2019/9298758 ↗
29. Cognitive vision system for control of dexterous prosthetic hands: Experimental evaluation10.1186/1743-0003-7-42 ↗
30. Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses10.1080/03091900210142459 ↗
31. Control strategies for a multiple degree of freedom prosthetic hand10.1177/002029400704000108 ↗
32. Movement error rate for evaluation of machine learning methods for sEMG-based hand movement classification10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2303394 ↗
33. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning10.1038/nature14236 ↗
34. Lange, F. (1922). Lehrbuch der Orthopädie, Gustav Fischer.
35. Weiner, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Wiley.
36. Eine neue Elektrokunsthand
37. A Russian bioelectric-controlled prosthesis: Report of a research team from the Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal
38. Surgical implications of myoelectric control10.1097/00003086-196811000-00026 ↗
39. Dunfield, V.A., and Scott, R.N. (1970, January 9–11). A surgically implanted myotelemetry unit. Proceedings of the 3rd Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, Halifax, NS, Canada.
40. Possibilities for control of powered devices by myoelectric signals10.2340/16501977197024164170 ↗
41. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control10.1109/TBME.2003.813539 ↗
42. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A review10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188 ↗
43. (2021, March 25). Touch Bionics. Available online: http://www.touchbionics.com/.
44. (2021, March 25). Vincent Hand. Available online: http://handprothese.de/vincent-hand/.
45. (2021, March 25). SensorHand Speed. Available online: http://www.ottobock.com/cps/rde/xchg/ob_com_en/hs.xsl/3652.html.
46. (2021, March 25). RSL Steeper. Available online: http://rslsteeper.com/.
47. (2021, March 25). Michelangelo Prosthetic Hand. Available online: https://www.ottobockus.com/prosthetics/upper-limb-prosthetics/solution-overview/michelangelo-prosthetic-hand/.
48. Development of new cosmetic gloves for myoelectric prosthetic hand using superelastic rubber10.1016/j.robot.2018.09.004 ↗
49. Design and fabrication of prosthetic glove for hand rehabilitation10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.849 ↗
50. Osseointegrated thumb prostheses: A concept for fixation of digit prosthetic devices10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80103-1 ↗
51. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand
52. One- vs two stage surgery technique for implant placement in finger prosthesis
53. One-Stage Surgery Technique for Implant Placement in Finger Prosthesis: A Clinical Note
54. Rahyussalim, J., Marsetio, A.F., Saleh, I., Kurniawati, T., and Whulanza, Y. (2016). The needs of current implant technology in orthopaedic prosthesis biomaterials application to reduce prosthesis failure rate. J. Nanomater., 5386924.10.1155/2016/5386924 ↗
55. Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: Prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up10.1080/03093640701553922 ↗
56. Evaluation of the psychophysical detection threshold level for vibrotactile and pressure stimulation of prosthetic limbs using bone anchorage or soft tissue support10.1080/03093640008726536 ↗
57. Osseointegration amputation prostheses on the upper limbs: Methods, prosthetics and rehabilitation10.1177/0309364611409003 ↗
58. Functional magnetic resonance imaging shows cortical activation on sensory stimulation of an osseointegrated prosthetic thumb10.1080/02844310600787005 ↗
59. Technological Advances in Prosthesis Design and Rehabilitation Following Upper Extremity Limb Loss10.1007/s12178-020-09656-6 ↗
60. (2021, March 12). e-OPRA Implant System for Lower Limb Amputees, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03720171.
61. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs
62. Grip control and motor coordination with implanted and surface electrodes while grasping with an osseointegrated prosthetic hand10.1186/s12984-019-0511-2 ↗
63. Prosthetic myoelectric control strategies: A clinical perspective10.1007/s40137-013-0044-8 ↗
64. Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: State-of-the-art review10.2147/MDER.S91102 ↗
65. Igual, C., Pardo, L.A., Hahne, J.M., and Igual, J. (2019). Myoelectric Control for Upper Limb Prostheses. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8111244 ↗