journal article·2021-05-07Open access

Sharing Soil and Building Geophysical Data for Seismic Characterization of Cities Using CLARA WebGIS: A Case Study of Matera (Southern Italy)

Nicola Tragni, Giuseppe Calamita, Lorenzo Lastilla, Valeria Belloni, Roberta Ravanelli, Michele Lupo, Vito Salvia, Maria Rosaria Gallipoli

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

In the context of seismic risk, studying the characteristics of urban soils and of the built environment means adopting a holistic vision of the city, taking a step forward compared to the current microzonation approach. Based on this principle, CLARA WebGIS aims to collect, organize, and disseminate the available information on soils and buildings in the urban area of Matera. The geodatabase is populated with (i) 488 downloadable geological, geotechnical, and geophysical surveys; (ii) geological, geomorphological, and seismic homogeneous microzone maps; and (iii) a new Digital Surface Model. The CLARA WebGIS is the first publicly available database that reports for the whole urban area the spatial distribution of the fundamental frequencies for soils and the overlying 4043 buildings, along with probability levels of soil-building resonance. The WebGIS is aimed at a broad range of end users (local government, engineers, geologists, etc.) as a support to the implementation of seismic risk mitigation strategies in terms of urban planning, seismic retrofitting, and management of post-earthquake crises. We recommend that the database be managed by local administrators, who would also have the task of deciding on future developments and continuous updating as new data becomes available.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Seismic Waves and Analysis · earthquake and tectonic studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IMAA), 85050 Tito Scalo, Italy

School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy

Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti (DIAG), Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy

Sapienza School for Advanced Studies, 00161 Rome, Italy

Geodesy and Geomatics Division, DICEA, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. United Nations (2021, March 31). 2014 Revision of the World Urbanization Prospects. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/2014-revision-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
2. Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P., Jäger, J., Matson, P., Moore, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H.J., and Turner, B.L. (2005). Global Change and the Earth System, Springer.10.1007/b137870 ↗
3. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2021, March 31). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Available online: https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030.
4. SDGS (2021, March 30). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
5. European Comission (2021, March 31). The Urban Agenda for the EU—Regional Policy—European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/urban-development/agenda/.
6. Resilient and sustainable cities of tomorrow: The role of applied geophysics
7. Bellanova, J., Calamita, G., Catapano, I., Ciucci, A., Cornacchia, C., Gennarelli, G., Giocoli, A., Fisangher, F., Ludeno, G., and Morelli, G. (2020). GPR and ERT Investigations in Urban Areas: The Case-Study of Matera (Southern Italy). Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12111879 ↗
8. Evaluation of soil-building resonance effect in the urban area of the city of Matera (Italy)10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105645 ↗
9. Lapenna, V. (2019, January 29–31). CLoud plAtform and smart underground imaging for natural risk assessment in urban areas: The Clara project. Proceedings of the SEG 2019 Workshop: Geophysics for Smart City Development, Beijing, China.10.1190/smct-2019-15.1 ↗
10. Massolino, G., Sandron, D., Gallipoli, M.R., Rebez, A., Mucciarelli, M., and Stabile, T.A. (2016, January 4–10). Ambient Vibration Measures on Strategic Buildings in Matera in the Framework of the CLARA-Smart Cities Project ESC2016-591. Proceedings of the 2016 35th General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Trieste, Italy.
11. A WebGIS system for relating genetic soil classification of China to soil taxonomy10.1016/j.cageo.2009.10.005 ↗
12. A geospatial decision support system to assist olive growing at the landscape scale10.1016/j.compag.2019.105143 ↗
13. (2021, March 31). (PDF) WebGIS e Divulgazione del Dato Archeologico con Software Open Source. Il Progetto “Siponto Aperta" | Ginevra Panzarino—Academia.edu. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/20286522/WebGIS_e_divulgazione_del_dato_archeologico_con_software_open_source_Il_progetto_Siponto_aperta_.
14. WebGIS tools to disseminate archaeological landscape memory
15. Filocamo, F., Di Paola, G., Mastrobuono, L., and Rosskopf, C.M. (2020). MoGeo, a Mobile Application to Promote Geotourism in Molise Region (Southern Italy). Resources, 9.10.3390/resources9030031 ↗
16. CEDIM Risk Explorer—A map server solution in the project “Risk Map Germany”10.5194/nhess-6-711-2006 ↗
17. RiskCity and WebRiskCity: Data Collection, Display, and Dissemination in a Multi-Risk Training Package10.1559/152304010791232190 ↗
18. The use of geo-information and modern visualization tools for risk communication10.1007/978-94-007-6769-0_15 ↗
19. WebGIS for Italian tsunami: A useful tool for coastal planners10.1016/j.margeo.2014.06.012 ↗
20. A collaborative (web-GIS) framework based on empirical data collected from three case studies in Europe for risk management of hydro-meteorological hazards10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.12.001 ↗
21. An interactive web-GIS tool for risk analysis: A case study in the Fella River basin, Italy10.5194/nhess-16-85-2016 ↗
22. 3D WebGIS-based platform for debris flow early warning: A case study10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.013 ↗
23. A WebGIS decision-support system for slope stability based on limit-equilibrium modelling10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.004 ↗
24. Database and online map service on unstable rock slopes in Norway—From data perpetuation to public information10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.08.005 ↗
25. A WebGIS for the dissemination of information on historical landslides and floods in Umbria, Italy10.1007/s10707-008-0072-1 ↗
26. A WebGis tool for seismic hazard scenarios and risk analysis10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.03.001 ↗
27. Bozzoni, F., Famà, A., Lai, C.G., and Mirfattah, S.A. (2014, January 1–5). Seismic risk assessment of seaports using GIS: The port of Gioia Tauro in Southern Italy. Proceedings of the 33rd PIANC World Congress, San Francisco, CA, USA.
28. To support urban emergency planning: A GIS instrument for the choice of optimal routes based on seismic hazards10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.020 ↗
29. Field Monitoring of Strong Ground Motion in Urban Areas: The Kalochori Accelerometric Network (KAN), Database and Web-GIS Portal10.1193/052917EQS098DP ↗
30. Multidisciplinary database of permeability of fault zones and surrounding protolith rocks at world-wide sites10.1038/s41597-020-0435-5 ↗
31. MAHA: A comprehensive system for the storage and visualization of subsoil data for seismic microzonation10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.021 ↗
32. Bard, P.Y., Gueguen, G., and Wirgin, A. (1996, January 23–28). A note on the seismic wavefield radiated from large building structures into soft soils. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
33. Simulation of seismic response in an idealized city10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00017-4 ↗
34. Analysis of RC Building Dynamic Response and Soil-Building Resonance Based on Data Recorded during a Damaging Earthquake (Molise, Italy, 2002)10.1785/012003186 ↗
35. Far field damage on RC buildings: The case study of Navelli during the L’Aquila (Italy) seismic sequence, 200910.1007/s10518-010-9201-y ↗
36. Effect of Vibrating Buildings on Free-Field Motion and on Adjacent Structures: The Bonefro (Italy) Case History10.1785/0120080312 ↗
37. Peculiar earthquake damage on a reinforced concrete building in San Gregorio (L’Aquila, Italy): Site effects or building defects?10.1007/s10518-011-9257-3 ↗
38. Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on fundamental frequency and radiation damping ratio of historical masonry building sub-structures10.1007/s10518-019-00748-4 ↗
39. Seismic waves generated by oscillating buildings: Analysis of a release test10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00021-6 ↗
40. Modifications of the Ground Motion in Dense Urban Areas10.1142/S0218396X01001509 ↗
41. Site-City Seismic Interaction in Mexico City-Like Environments: An Analytical Study10.1785/0120000306 ↗
42. Simulation of seismic response in a city-like environment10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.007 ↗
43. Seismic Site-City Interaction: Main Governing Phenomena through Simplified Numerical Models10.1785/0120050143 ↗
44. Structure–soil–structure coupling in seismic excitation and “city effect.”10.1016/j.ijengsci.2008.11.005 ↗
45. Dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction between nearby piled buildings under seismic excitation by BEM–FEM model10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.001 ↗
46. Site-city interaction: Theoretical, numerical and experimental crossed-analysis10.1093/gji/ggw049 ↗
47. Agea-Medina, N., Kharazian, A., Molina, S., Galiana-Merino, J., and Soler-Llorens, J.L. (2020, January 23–26). Fundamental period relationship of RC-buildings in Alicante province (Spain). A first step to soil-structure resonance maps. Proceedings of the XI International Conference of Structural Dynamics, Athens, Greece.10.47964/1120.9380.19895 ↗
48. Increased seismic hazard in Barcelona (Spain) due to soil-building resonance effects10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.022 ↗
49. Seismic site characterisation of Red Soil and soil-building resonance effects in L’Aquila downtown (Central Italy)10.1007/s10064-020-01795-x ↗
50. Hierarchical Bayesian nets for building extraction using dense digital surface models10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00012-4 ↗
51. Development of a 3-D urbanization index using digital terrain models for surface urban heat island effects10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.03.009 ↗
52. DSM-based identification of changes in highly dynamic urban agglomerations10.1080/22797254.2019.1604083 ↗
53. Digital surface models from ZiYuan-3 triplet: Performance evaluation and accuracy assessment10.1080/01431161.2016.1192308 ↗
54. Lastilla, L., Belloni, V., Ravanelli, R., and Crespi, M. (2021). DSM Generation from Single and Cross-Sensor Multi-View Satellite Images Using the New Agisoft Metashape: The Case Studies of Trento and Matera (Italy). Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13040593 ↗
55. (2021, March 31). DBGT & CTR | RSDI. Available online: http://rsdi.regione.basilicata.it/dbgt-ctr/.
56. (2021, March 31). RNC Rilevazione Numeri Civici ed Edifici. Dataset—OpenData Matera. Available online: http://dati.comune.matera.it/dataset/rnc-rilevazione-numeri-civici-ed-edifici.
57. (2021, March 31). Italian National Institute of Statistics, ISTAT. Territorial Bases and Census Variables, Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/104317.
58. SESAME Project (2021, March 31). Guidelines for the Implementation of the H/V Spectral Ratio Technique on Ambient Vibrations. In: Measurements, Processing and Interpretation, (WP12, Deliverable N. D23.12). Available online: http://sesame-fp5.obs.ujf-renoble.fr/Papers/HV_User_Guidelines.pdf.
59. Empirical estimates of dynamic parameters on a large set of European buildings10.1007/s10518-009-9133-6 ↗
60. The contribution of the ambient vibration prospecting in seismic microzoning: An example from the area damaged by the April 6, 2009 L’Aquila (Italy) earthquake
61. Comune di Matera (2021, March 31). Piano Strutturale Comunale. Available online: https://www.comune.matera.it/piano-strutturale-comunale.
62. Ivona, A., and Rinella, A. (2019). Glocal Tourism and Resilient Cities: The Case of Matera “European Capital of Culture 2019.”. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11154118 ↗
63. Agisoft PhotoScan Software (2020, January 30). Agisoft Metashape. Available online: https://www.agisoft.com/.
64. Nascetti, A., and Crespi, M. Personal communication.
65. Pavlis, N.K., Holmes, S.A., Kenyon, S.C., and Factor, J.K. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 117.10.1029/2011JB008916 ↗
66. Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.017 ↗
67. Bossard, M., Feranec, J., Otahel, J., and Steenmans, C. (2000). CORINE Land Cover Technical Guide-Addendum 2000.
68. The forgotten vulnerability: A geology- and history-based approach for ranking the seismic risk of earthquake-prone communities of the Italian Apennines10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.014 ↗
69. Disastri e ricostruzioni nella storia d’Italia: L’azzardo sismico in un nodo storico non risolto
70. (2021, March 31). Decreto Ministeriale n. 329 del 6 Agosto 2020 | mit, Available online: https://www.mit.gov.it/normativa/decreto-ministeriale-n-329-del-6-agosto-2020.
71. SM Working Group (2021, March 31). Guidelines for SEISMIC MICROZONATION, Available online: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/httpdocs/cms/attach_extra/GuidelinesForSeismicMicrozonation.pdf.