Virtual Reality Environment with Haptic Feedback Thimble for Post Spinal Cord Injury Upper-Limb Rehabilitation
Source abstract
Abstract
Cervical spinal cord injury is damage to the spinal cord that causes temporary or permanent changes in body functions below the site of the injury. In particular, the impairment of the upper limbs limits the patient’s autonomy in the execution of activities of daily living. This paper illustrates the use of a low-cost robot with a virtual reality platform for upper limb rehabilitation of cervical spinal cord injury patients. Vibration and pressure haptic feedback sensations are provided thanks to a custom-made thimble feedback device. The virtual reality platform consists of three different virtual rehabilitation games developed in Unity. They provide the user with the opportunity to interact with the virtual scene using free hands thanks to the data collected by a hand tracking system. During the therapy session, quantitative data about the motor performance are collected. Each virtual reality environment can be modified in settings according to the patients’ needs. A proof of concept was performed with both healthy subjects and spinal cord injured patients to evaluate the platform and its usability. The data saved during the sessions are analyzed to validate the importance of haptic feedback and stored both for patients and therapists to control the performance and the recovery process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Spinal Cord Injury Research · Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Finca La Peraleda, 45071 Toledo, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Bickenbach, J., Officer, A., Shakespeare, T., and von Groote, P. (2013). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury: Summary, ISCOS.
2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2021, March 09). Spinal Cord Injury Information Page, Available online: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Topic-Areas/spinal-cord-injury.
3. Kirshblum, S.C., Burns, S.P., Biering-Sorensen, F., Donovan, W., Graves, D.E., Jha, A., Johansen, M., Jones, L., Krassioukov, A., and Mulcahey, M.J. (2011). International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J. Spinal Cord Med.10.1179/204577211X13207446293695 ↗
4. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: What learns a worldwide literature survey?10.1038/sj.sc.3101893 ↗
5. International spinal cord injury core data set10.1038/sj.sc.3101958 ↗
6. Merritt, C.H., Taylor, M.A., Yelton, C.J., and Ray, S.K. (2019). Economic impact of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the United States. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm.10.20517/2347-8659.2019.15 ↗
7. GSnoek, J., Ijzerman, M.J., Hermens, H.J., Maxwell, D., and Biering-Sorensen, F. (2004). Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: Impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord.10.1038/sj.sc.3101638 ↗
8. Dimbwadyo-Terrer, I., Trincado-Alonso, F., de los Reyes-Guzmán, A., Aznar, M.A., Alcubilla, C., Pérez-Nombela, S., del Ama-Espinosa, A., Polonio-López, B., and Gil-Agudo, Á. (2016). Upper limb rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: A treatment based on a data glove and an immersive virtual reality environment. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol.10.3109/17483107.2015.1027293 ↗
9. Lo, C., Tran, Y., Anderson, K., Craig, A., and Middleton, J. (2016). Functional priorities in persons with spinal cord injury: Using discrete choice experiments to determine preferences. J. Neurotrauma.10.1089/neu.2016.4423 ↗
10. Mekki, M., Delgado, A.D., Fry, A., Putrino, D., and Huang, V. (2018). Robotic rehabilitation and spinal cord injury: A narrative review. Neurotherapeutics.10.1007/s13311-018-0642-3 ↗
11. Early intensive hand rehabilitation is not more effective than usual care plus one-to-one hand therapy in people with sub-acute spinal cord injury (‘Hands On’): A randomised trial10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.013 ↗
12. Musselman, K.E., Shah, M., and Zariffa, J. (2018). Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: Translational potential of current trends. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.10.1186/s12984-018-0386-7 ↗
13. Neural plasticity after spinal cord injury10.2174/1381612053507855 ↗
14. Dunlop, S.A. (2008). Activity-dependent plasticity: Implications for recovery after spinal cord injury. Trends Neurosci.10.1016/j.tins.2008.05.004 ↗
15. Karimi, M.T. (2013). Robotic rehabilitation of spinal cord injury individual. Ortop. Traumatol. Rehabil.
16. Kadivar, Z., Sullivan, J.L., Eng, D.P., Pehlivan, A.U., O′Malley, M.K., Yozbatiran, N., and Francisco, G.E. (July, January 29). Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: A case study. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Zurich, Switzerland.
17. Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: A systematic scoping review10.1080/17483107.2018.1425747 ↗
18. Robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after cervical spinal cord injury10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.008 ↗
19. Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: Facts, fiction and fallacies10.1080/17434440.2018.1425613 ↗
20. Efficacy of virtual reality in upper limb rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled trial10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.927 ↗
21. Demain, S., Metcalf, C., Merrett, G., Zheng, D., and Cunningham, S. (2012). A narrative review on haptic devices: Relating the physiology and psychophysical properties of the hand to devices for rehabilitation in central nervous system disorders. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., 8.10.3109/17483107.2012.697532 ↗
22. Haptic neurorehabilitation and virtual reality for upper limb paralysis: A review10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016046 ↗
23. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: A comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis10.1186/1743-0003-1-11 ↗
24. A pneumatic glove and immersive virtual reality environment for hand rehabilitative training after stroke10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047588 ↗
25. Assisting hand function after spinal cord injury with a fabric-based soft robotic glove10.1186/s12984-018-0391-x ↗
26. Gutiérrez, Á., Sepúlveda-Muñoz, D., Gil-Agudo, Á., and de los Reyes Guzmán, A. (2020). Serious game platform with haptic feedback and emg monitoring for upper limb rehabilitation and smoothness quantification on spinal cord injury patients. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030963 ↗
27. The efficacy of a haptic-enhanced virtual reality system for precision grasp acquisition in stroke rehabilitation10.1155/2017/9840273 ↗
28. Yem, V., and Kajimoto, H. (2017, January 18–22). Wearable tactile device using mechanical and electrical stimulation for fingertip interaction with virtual world. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/VR.2017.7892236 ↗
29. Pacchierotti, C., Tirmizi, A., and Prattichizzo, D. (2014). Improving transparency in teleoperation by means of cutaneous tactile force feedback. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept., 11.10.1145/2604969 ↗
30. Chinello, F., Malvezzi, M., Pacchierotti, C., and Prattichizzo, D. (2015, January 7–11). Design and development of a 3RRS wearable fingertip cutaneous device. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Busan, Korea.10.1109/AIM.2015.7222547 ↗
31. Pessina, L.-A. (2021, March 09). Artificial Skin Could Help Rehabilitation and Enhance Virtual Reality. Available online: https://actu.epfl.ch/news/artificial-skin-could-help-rehabilitation-and-enha/.
32. Meli, L., Scheggi, S., Pacchierotti, C., and Prattichizzo, D. (2015, January 22–26). Using the Leap Motion Controller for Hand Tracking and Wearable Haptic Devices for Contact Rendering. Proceedings of the World Haptics, Chicago, IL, USA.
33. Mechanical Vibration in Rehabilitation: State of the Art10.4172/2165-7025.1000314 ↗
34. Sofronia, R.E., Savii, G., and Davidescu, A. (2010, January 27–29). Haptic devices in engineering and medicine. Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Computational Cybernetics and Technical Informatics, Timisoara, Romania.10.1109/ICCCYB.2010.5491247 ↗
35. Colgan, A. (2021, March 09). How Does the Leap Motion Controller Work?. Available online: http://blog.leapmotion.com/hardware-to-software-how-does-the-leap-motion-controller-work/.
36. Vibration in neurorehabilitation: A narrative review