journal article·2020-12-24Open access

Development of an Automatic Functional Movement Screening System with Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors

Wen-Lan Wu, Meng-Hua Lee, Hsiu-Tao Hsu, Wen-Hsien Ho, Jing-Min Liang

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Background: In this study, an automatic scoring system for the functional movement screen (FMS) was developed. Methods: Thirty healthy adults fitted with full-body inertial measurement unit sensors completed six FMS exercises. The system recorded kinematics data, and a professional athletic trainer graded each participant. To reduce the number of input variables for the predictive model, ordinal logistic regression was used for subset feature selection. The ensemble learning algorithm AdaBoost.M1 was used to construct classifiers. Accuracy and F score were used for classification model evaluation. The consistency between automatic and manual scoring was assessed using a weighted kappa statistic. Results: When all the features were used, the predict model presented moderate to high accuracy, with kappa values between fair to very good agreement. After feature selection, model accuracy decreased about 10%, with kappa values between poor to moderate agreement. Conclusions: The results indicate that higher prediction accuracy was achieved using the full feature set compared with using the reduced feature set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Physical Activity and Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Sports Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

Center for Physical and Health Education, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan

Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Association Between Functional Movement Screen Scores and Injuries in Male College Basketball Players
2. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0363546516641937 ↗
3. The association between the functional movement screen outcome and the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.11.011 ↗
4. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes
5. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.11 ↗
6. IMU-Based Classification of Parkinson’s Disease from Gait: A Sensitivity Analysis on Sensor Location and Feature Selection10.1109/JBHI.2018.2865218 ↗
7. Self-directed arm therapy at home after stroke with a sensor-based virtual reality training system10.1186/s12984-016-0182-1 ↗
8. Technology in rehabilitation: Evaluating the single leg squat exercise with wearable inertial measurement units10.3414/ME16-02-0002 ↗
9. Crema, C., Depari, A., Flammini, A., Sisinni, E., Haslwanter, T., and Salzmann, S. (2017, January 13–15). IMU-based solution for automatic detection and classification of exercises in the fitness scenario. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Glassboro, NJ, USA.10.1109/SAS.2017.7894068 ↗
10. Buckley, C., O’Reilly, M.A., Whelan, D., Farrell, A.V., Clark, L., Longo, V., Gilchrist, M.D., and Caulfield, B. (2017, January 9–12). Binary classification of running fatigue using a single inertial measurement unit. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1109/BSN.2017.7936040 ↗
11. Determining motions with an IMU during level walking and slope and stair walking10.1080/02640414.2019.1680083 ↗
12. Rindal, O., Seeberg, T., Tjønnås, J., Haugnes, P., and Sandbakk, Ø. (2018). Automatic classification of sub-techniques in classical cross-country skiing using a machine learning algorithm on micro-sensor data. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18010075 ↗
13. Monitoring hitting load in tennis using inertial sensors and machine learning10.1123/ijspp.2016-0683 ↗
14. Grading the functional movement screen: A comparison of manual (real-time) and objective methods10.1519/JSC.0000000000000654 ↗
15. Study of the measurement and predictive validity of the functional movement screen10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000357 ↗
16. Kisner, C., Colby, L.A., and Borstad, J. (2017). Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques, F.A. Davis. [7th ed.].
17. Larose, D.T. (2005). An introduction to data mining. Discovering Knowledge in Data, John Wiley & Sons Publication.10.1002/0471687545 ↗
18. Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., and Uthurusamy, R. (1996). Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press.
19. Motion estimation from surface electromyogram using adaboost regression and average feature values10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2892780 ↗
20. Haider, F., Salim, F.A., Postma, D.B., Delden, R.V., Reidsma, D., van Beijnum, B.-J., and Luz, S. (2020). A Super-Bagging Method for Volleyball Action Recognition Using Wearable Sensors. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 4.10.3390/mti4020033 ↗
21. Enhanced estimations of post-stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions10.1002/hbm.23752 ↗
22. (2019, December 13). BoostFix User Manual. Available online: https://boostfix.compal-health.com/user_manual.pdf.
23. The Impact of the Corrective and Stability Exercises Program on the Quality of Basic Movement Patterns among Dance Students
24. Jensen, U., Weilbrenner, F., Rott, F., and Eskofier, B. (2012, January 21–23). Sensor-based mobile functional movement screening. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare, Paris, France.10.1007/978-3-642-37893-5_25 ↗