journal article·2020-11-12Open access

Selection of the Optimal Actions for Crashing Processes Duration to Increase the Robustness of Construction Schedules

Sławomir Biruk, Piotr Jaśkowski

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 22

Abstract

Both the construction clients and the contractors want their projects delivered on time. Construction schedules, usually tight from the beginning, tend to expire as the progress of works is disturbed by materializing risks. As consequence, the project’s original milestones are delayed. To protect the due date and, at the same time, avoid changes to the logic of work, the manager needs to the project progress and, if delays occur, speed up processes not yet completed. The authors investigate the problem of selecting the optimal set of actions of responding to schedule delays. They put forward a simulation-based method of selecting schedule compression measures (speeding up processes) and determining the best moment to take such actions. The idea is explained using a simple case. The results confirm that it is possible to find an easily implementable schedule crashing mode to answer schedule disturbances. The proposed method enables minimizing the cost of schedule crashing actions and the cost of delays as well as increasing the robustness of the schedule by reducing differences between the actual and the as-planned process starts. It is intended as a decision support tool to help construction managers prepare better reactive schedules. The lowest costs are achieved if the acceleration measures are implemented with some time lag to the occurrence of delays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Construction Project Management and Performance · BIM and Construction Integration · Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Factors on non-excusable delays that influence contractors’ performance10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1998)14:3(42) ↗
2. Identification and Initial Risk Assessment of Construction Projects in Poland10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:3(120) ↗
3. Flanagan, R., and Norman, G. (1993). Risk Management and Construction, Blackwell Publishing.
4. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001 ↗
5. Construction projects planning using network model with the fuzzy decision node10.1007/s13762-019-02259-w ↗
6. Risk and risk management in construction projects: Concepts, terms and risk categories re-defined
7. Golenko-Ginzburg, D. (2011). Stochastic Network Models in Innovative Projecting, Science Book Publishing House.
8. A lognormal approximation of activity duration in PERT using two time estimates10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602204 ↗
9. Estimating Task Duration in PERT using the Weibull Probability Distribution10.22237/jmasm/1241137500 ↗
10. Estimating project and activity duration: A risk management approach using network analysis10.1080/014461998372574 ↗
11. The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis
12. Practical use of distributions in network analysis10.1057/jors.1992.35 ↗
13. Kotz, S., and Van Dorp, J.R. (2004). Beyond Beta—Other Continuous Families of Distributions with Bounded Support and Applications, World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd.10.1142/5720 ↗
14. Vose, D. (2008). Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
15. Combined Discrete-Event/Continuous Simulation for Project Planning10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:1(11) ↗
16. Probabilistic Duration Estimation Model for High-Rise Structural Work10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000105 ↗
17. Simulation modeling of weather-sensitive tunnelling construction activities subject to cold weather10.1139/cjce-2013-0087 ↗
18. Simplified CPM/PERT Simulation Model10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(219) ↗
19. Activity-Based Construction (ABC) Modeling and Simulation Method10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(354) ↗
20. Advanced Stochastic Schedule Simulation System10.1080/10286608.2011.637623 ↗
21. Simulation-Based Approach for Estimating Project Completion Time of Stochastic Resource–Constrained Project Networks10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000165 ↗
22. Probability of Project Completion Using Stochastic Project Scheduling Simulation10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(310) ↗
23. RPERT: Repetitive-Projects Evaluation and Review Technique10.1016/j.aej.2013.08.003 ↗
24. The method for improving stability of construction project schedules through buffer allocation/statybos vykdymo grafiko stabilumo užtikrinimas paskirstant laiko rezervus10.3846/20294913.2011.580587 ↗
25. An optimal construction resource leveling scheduling simulation model10.1139/l02-007 ↗
26. Simulation model for resource-constrained construction project10.1515/eng-2019-0037 ↗
27. On the design of online production scheduling algorithms10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106517 ↗
28. Framework for studying online production scheduling under endogenous uncertainty10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106670 ↗
29. Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.061 ↗
30. Balouka, N., and Cohen, I. A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2019.
31. Reliability buffering for construction projects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:5(626) ↗
32. The construction of stable project baseline schedules10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00130-9 ↗
33. Goldratt, E.M. (1997). Critical Chain, The North River Press.
34. The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.08.004 ↗
35. Impact of Baseline Terms on the Course of Critical Paths and Time Buffers in the Modified Goldratt’s Method10.2478/ace-2013-0017 ↗
36. The trade-off between stability and makespan in resource-constrained project scheduling10.1080/00207540500140914 ↗
37. Methodology for enhancing reliability of predictive project schedules in construction10.17531/ein.2015.3.20 ↗
38. New strategies for stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling10.1007/s10951-016-0505-x ↗
39. A new when-to-schedule policy in online scheduling based on cumulative task delays10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.015 ↗
40. Efficient priority rules for project scheduling under dynamic environments: A heuristic approach10.1016/j.cie.2020.106287 ↗
41. On the performance of priority rules for the stochastic resource constrained multi-project scheduling problem10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.021 ↗
42. Proactive and reactive scheduling in practice
43. Heuristic procedures for reactive project scheduling10.1016/j.cie.2006.10.002 ↗
44. Flexibility Approach in Construction Process Engineering/Lankstumas Statybos Proceso Inžinerijoje10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.518-530 ↗
45. Reactive scheduling in the multi-mode RCPSP10.1016/j.cor.2010.01.001 ↗
46. A comparison of dispatching rules for executing a resource-constrained project with estimated activity durations10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00021-8 ↗
47. Law, A., and Kelton, W.D. (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill Education. [3rd ed.].
48. Miłosz, M., Pastuszak, Z., and Miłosz, E. (2015, January 2–4). Decision-making simulation games as a tool for verifying enterprise logistic strategies. Proceedings of the INTED2015: 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Madrid, Spain.
49. On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00483-X ↗
50. Demeulemeester, E.L., and Herroelen, W.S. (2002). Project Scheduling, A Research Handbook, Kluwer Academic Publishers.