Assessment of Earthquake Destructive Power to Structures Based on Machine Learning Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents a machine learning-based method for the destructive power assessment of earthquake to structures. First, the analysis procedure of the method is presented, and the backpropagation neural network (BPNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are used as the machine learning algorithms. Second, the optimized BPNN architecture is obtained by discussing the influence of a different number of hidden layers and nodes. Third, the CNN architecture is proposed based on several classical deep learning networks. To build the machine learning models, 50,570 time-history analysis results of a structural system subjected to different ground motions are used as training, validation, and test samples. The results of the BPNN indicate that the features extraction method based on the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) can well reflect the frequency-/time-domain characteristics of ground motions. The results of the CNN indicate that the CNN exhibits better accuracy (R2 = 0.8737) compared with that of the BPNN (R2 = 0.6784). Furthermore, the CNN model exhibits remarkable computational efficiency, the prediction of 1000 structures based on the CNN model takes 0.762 s, while 507.81 s are required for the conventional time-history analysis (THA)-based simulation. Feature visualization of different layers of the CNN reveals that the shallow to deep layers of the CNN can extract the high to low-frequency features of ground motions. The proposed method can assist in the fast prediction of engineering demand parameters of large-number structures, which facilitates the damage or loss assessments of regional structures for timely emergency response and disaster relief after earthquake.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Seismic Waves and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program · Intellectual Innovation Program of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Design objectives and collapse prevention for building structures in mega-earthquake10.1007/s11803-010-0005-5 ↗
2. Transport-related impacts of the Northridge earthquake
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996). ATC-40: The Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council.
4. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012). Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model. HAZUS-MH 2.1 Technical Manual.
5. Comparison of displacement coefficient method and capacity spectrum method with experimental results of RC columns10.1002/eqe.336 ↗
6. Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City metropolitan region10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.012 ↗
7. A nonlinear computational model for regional seismic simulation of tall buildings10.1007/s10518-016-9880-0 ↗
8. Xiong, C., Deng, X., Liang, Y., Li, Q., Huang, J., Lin, X., and Li, D. (2020). Regional seismic damage simulation of corroded RC frame structures: A case study of Shenzhen city. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10144818 ↗
9. Framework for city-scale building seismic resilience simulation and repair scheduling with labor constraints driven by time–history analysis10.1111/mice.12496 ↗
10. An open-source framework for regional earthquake loss estimation using the city-scale nonlinear time history analysis10.1177/8755293019891724 ↗
11. Multi-LOD seismic-damage simulation of urban buildings and case study in Beijing CBD10.1007/s10518-018-00522-y ↗
12. Collapse simulation of reinforced concrete high-rise building induced by extreme earthquakes10.1002/eqe.2240 ↗
13. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
14. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
15. Dankovičová, Z., Sovák, D., Drotár, P., and Vokorokos, L. (2018). Machine learning approach to dysphonia detection. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8101927 ↗
16. Lee, J., Park, J., Kim, K.L., and Nam, J. (2018). SampleCNN: End-to-end deep convolutional neural networks using very small filters for music classification. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8010150 ↗
17. Xu, Z., Wu, Y., Qi, M.Z., Zheng, M., and Lu, X. (2020). Prediction of structural type for city-scale seismic damage simulation based on machine learning. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10051795 ↗
18. Artificial neural network based multi-dimensional fragility development of skewed concrete bridge classes10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.053 ↗
19. Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response10.1007/s00366-019-00733-0 ↗
20. Physics-guided convolutional neural network (PhyCNN) for data-driven seismic response modeling10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110704 ↗
21. On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 ↗
22. Automated regional seismic damage assessment of buildings using an unmanned aerial vehicle and a convolutional neural network10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102994 ↗
23. Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning10.1177/8755293019878137 ↗
24. Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109785 ↗
25. Deep long short-term memory networks for nonlinear structural seismic response prediction10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.05.006 ↗
26. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
27. Zhang, Y., Wang, C., Gong, L., Lu, Y., and Zhou, X. (2017, January 5–8). A Power-Efficient Accelerator Based on FPGAs for LSTM Network. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CLUSTER.2017.45 ↗
28. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
29. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings: FEMA 273.
30. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1985). Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California. ATC-13 Report, Applied Technology Council.
31. Conversion of multi-story building into equivalent SDOF system and its predictability for earthquake response10.3130/aijs.66.79_5 ↗
32. Irie, T., Mazda, T., and Sumaya, A.D. (February, January 30). Application of an estimation method for response of structures by equilibrium energies. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE 2000), Auckland, New Zealand.
33. PEER Center (2013). PEER Ground Motion Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Headquarters at the University of California. PEER NGA-West2 Database 2013/03.
34. Ng, A. (2020, August 07). The Deeplearning.ai Blog/BOOKS/Machine Learning Yearning. Available online: https://www.deepLearning.ai/machine-learning-yearing.
35. On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks10.1016/0893-6080(89)90003-8 ↗
36. Artificial neural network approach for prediction of stress–strain curve of near β titanium alloy10.1007/s12598-013-0182-2 ↗
37. A fast fourier transform for high-speed signal processing10.1109/T-C.1971.223359 ↗
38. Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation10.1109/TSP.2002.807005 ↗
39. Enochson, L.D., and Piersol, A.G. (1967, January 2–6). Application of fast Fourier transform procedures to shock and vibration data analysis. Proceedings of the Aeronautic and Space Engineering Manufacturing Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.4271/670874 ↗
40. The fast Fourier transform and its applications10.1109/TE.1969.4320436 ↗
41. Undersampling in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing telecommunication systems10.3390/app4010079 ↗
42. Ho, T.-J., and Chung, M.-J. (2016). Information-aided smart schemes for vehicle flow detection enhancements of traffic microwave radar detectors. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6070196 ↗
43. Research on relationship between natural vibration periods and structural heights for high-rise buildings and its reference range in China
44. Time-frequency and time-scale domain analysis of voltage disturbances10.1109/61.891515 ↗
45. How initial conditions affect generalization performance in large networks10.1109/72.557701 ↗
46. Improving generalization performance using double backpropagation10.1109/72.165600 ↗
47. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel.
48. Bayesian regularization and pruning using a Laplace prior10.1162/neco.1995.7.1.117 ↗
49. Masood, S., Doja, M.N., and Chandra, P. (2015, January 8–10). Analysis of weight initialization methods for gradient descent with momentum. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Soft Computing Techniques and Implementations(ICSCTI), Faridabad, India.10.1109/ICSCTI.2015.7489618 ↗
50. On early stopping in gradient descent learning10.1007/s00365-006-0663-2 ↗
51. Anomaly detection in phonocardiogram employing deep learning
52. Raza, A., Mehmood, A., Ullah, S., Ahmad, M., Choi, G.S., and On, B.-W. (2019). Heartbeat Sound Signal Classification Using Deep Learning. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19214819 ↗
53. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
54. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2015, January 7–9). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations 2015 (ICLR 2015), San Diego, CA, USA.
55. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J.L. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimisation. arXiv.
56. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1—Methodology.