journal article·2020-08-19Open access

Traffic Noise Mitigation Using Single and Double Barrier Caps of Different Shapes for an Extended Frequency Range

Domingo Pardo-Quiles, José-Víctor Rodríguez, Jose-Maria Molina-García-Pardo, Leandro Juan-Llácer

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 17

Abstract

The primary function of noise barriers is to shield inhabitants of affected areas from excessive noise generated by road traffic. To enhance the performance of noise barriers while simultaneously adhering to height restrictions, the attachment of structures (caps) of different shapes to the tops of conventional screens can be considered. These caps can significantly impact the diffracted sound energy, thereby increasing the desired global acoustic losses. This work presents a comprehensive study of the acoustic performance of noise barriers with single and double attached caps of different shapes through a calculation of their insertion losses (IL). This study comprehensively addresses and compares different types, sizes, combinations, and numbers of noise barrier caps for different scenarios (including sloping and absorbent grounds) and sources (“car” and “ambulance”) for an extended frequency band up to 10 kHz. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is a range that has not previously been analyzed. A variety of different cap shapes were considered including cylinders, rectangles, trapezoids, and Y/T-shaped forms. To calculate the IL, an innovative and fast uniform theory of diffraction (UTD)-based method developed by the authors was applied in all simulations. The results showed that the Y-shaped single and double barrier caps were, in general, the most effective at increasing IL without raising the height of the barrier, thereby successfully managing the aesthetic impact. The results also showed how the consideration of sloping and absorbent floors could also contribute to improved noise abatement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Antiguo Cuartel de Antigones, Plaza del Hospital, 1, 30202 Cartagena, Murcia, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., and Schwela, D.H. (1999). Guidelines for Community Noise, World Health Organization. Available online: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/a68672.pdf.
2. JRC European Commission (2011). Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise. Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe, World Health Organization.
3. A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.107 ↗
4. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X ↗
5. Road traffic noise, sleep and mental health10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.010 ↗
6. Annoyance evaluation due to overall railway noise and vibration in Pisa urban areas10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.071 ↗
7. Ambient noise and cognitive processes among primary schoolchildren10.1177/0013916503256260 ↗
8. Chetoni, M., Fredianelli, L., Minichilli, F., Cori, L., Licitra, G., and Bianco, F. (2016, January 10–14). Correlation between perceived and measured noise, within the Gioconda project. Proceedings of the ICSV 2016–23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration: From Ancient to Modern Acoustics, Athens, Greece.
9. Hypertension ischemic heart disease. The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.023 ↗
10. Long-term residential road traffic noise and NO2 exposure in relation to risk of incident myocardial infarction–A Danish cohort study10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.019 ↗
11. Long-term exposure to residential railway and road traffic noise and risk for diabetes in a Danish cohort10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.008 ↗
12. Śliwińska-Kowalska, M., and Zaborowski, K. (2017). WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Permanent Hearing Loss and Tinnitus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14101139 ↗
13. Influence of texture on tyre road noise spectra in rubberized pavements10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107080 ↗
14. Modelling the acoustic performance of newly laid low-noise pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118509 ↗
15. Permeability and volumetrics of porous asphalt concrete: A theoretical and experimental investigation
16. Roads and loudness: A more comprehensive approach10.1080/14680629.2001.9689908 ↗
17. Performance assessment of low-noise road surfaces in the Leopoldo project: Comparison and validation of different measurement methods10.3390/coatings5010003 ↗
18. Fredianelli, L., Del Pizzo, A., and Licitra, G. (2019). Recent developments in sonic crystals as barriers for road traffic noise mitigation. Environments, 6.10.3390/environments6020014 ↗
19. Acoustic performance of noise barrier based on sonic crystals with resonant elements10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.06.003 ↗
20. The method of fundamental solutions for the analysis of infinite 3D sonic crystals10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.09.015 ↗
21. Acoustic performance of new designs of traffic noise barriers: Full-scale tests10.1006/jsvi.1994.1435 ↗
22. Acoustic performance of a multiple-edge noise barrier profile at motorway sites10.1016/0003-682X(95)00030-D ↗
23. Acoustic performance of an interference type noise barrier10.1016/0003-682X(95)00066-I ↗
24. Effectiveness of novel shaped bunds in reducing traffic noise
25. Haan, C., and Kim, S. (2016, January 5–9). Comparison of the insertion loss of noise barriers with different shapes of upper structure. Proceedings of the Road Traffic Noise Modeling and Noise Barrier, 22nd International Congress on Acoustics, ICA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
26. Performance of noise barriers with various edge shapes and acoustical conditions10.1016/j.apacoust.2003.08.006 ↗
27. On the experimental evaluation of the performances of noise barrier diffracting devices
28. Performance of passive and reactive profiled median barriers in traffic noise reduction10.1631/jzus.A1000065 ↗
29. Yamamoto, K. (June, January 31). Japanese experience to reduce road traffic noise by barriers with noise-reducing devices. Proceedings of the 10th European Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, EuroNoise, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
30. Performance Evaluation of T-Shaped Noise Barriers Covered with Oblique Diffusers Using Boundary Element Method
31. Morgan, P. (2014). QUESTIM. Assessing the Acoustic Durability of Noise Barriers on NRA Road Networks, CEDR. CEDR Transnational Road Research Programme.
32. Vanhooreweder, B., Marcocci, S., and De Leo, A. (2016). State of the Art in Managing Road Traffic Noise: Noise Barriers, CEDR. Technical Report 2017-02.
33. The performance of sound absorptive, reflective and T-profile noise barriers in Toronto10.1016/0022-460X(80)90409-5 ↗
34. Traffic Noise Spectrum Analysis: Dynamic Modeling vs. Experimental Observations10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.04.002 ↗
35. Road-Traffic Noise and Factors Influencing Noise Annoyance in an Urban Population10.1016/j.envint.2008.10.001 ↗
36. Dravitzki, V., Walton, D.K., and Wood, W.B. (2006). Determining the Influence of New Zealand Road Surfaces on Noise Levels and Community Annoyance, Land Transport New Zealand. Report 292.
37. EN 1793-3 (1997). Road Traffic Noise Reducing Devices–Test Method for Determining the Acoustic Performance–Part 3; Normalized Traffic Noise Spectrum, European Committee for Standardization.
38. Baulac, M., Guillou, A., Defrance, J., and Jean, P. (2008). Calculations of low height noise barriers efficiency by using Boundary Element Method and optimization algorithms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.10.1121/1.2932667 ↗
39. A framework for the design of ambulance sirens10.1080/00140130701318780 ↗
40. Acoustic characteristics for effective ambulance sirens
41. (2020, August 18). U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Environment/noise/noise_barriers/inventory/summary/stable713.cfm.
42. Morgan, P. (2004). Review of Japanese Noise Barrier Research (DWW-2004-081), Rijkswaterstatt Dienst Verkeer en Scheepvaart.
43. A Fast UTD-based Method for the Analysis of Multiple Acoustic Diffractions over a Series of Obstacles with Arbitrary Modeling, Height and Spacing
44. Geometrical theory of diffraction10.1364/JOSA.52.000116 ↗
45. A uniform geometrical theory of di_raction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface10.1109/PROC.1974.9651 ↗
46. Diffraction of sound around corners and over wide barriers10.1121/1.1914668 ↗
47. Multiple acoustic diffraction around rigid parallel wide barriers10.1121/1.3147491 ↗
48. Rasmussen, K. (1997). Calculation Methods for the Physical Properties of Air Used in the Calibration of Microphones, Department of Acoustic Technology, Technical University of Denmark. Report PL-11b.
49. McNamara, D.A., Pistorius, C.W.I., and Malherbe, J.A.G. (1990). Introduction to the Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction, Artech House.
50. A UTD solution for multiple rounded surfaces. IEEE Trans10.1109/TAP.2006.872675 ↗
51. A hybrid UTD-PO solution for multiple-cylinder diffraction analysis assuming spherical-wave incidence10.1109/TAP.2008.928817 ↗
52. Kinsler, L.E., Frey, A.R., Coppens, A.B., and Sanders, J.V. (1999). Fundamentals of Acoustics, Wiley.
53. Fahy, F., and Rossing, T.D. (2001). Foundations of Engineering Acoustics, Elsevier Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012247665-5/50002-3 ↗