Effects of Vehicular Communication on Risk Assessment in Automated Driving Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper proposes a human-centered risk assessment algorithm designed to find the intervention moment of drive mode and active safety mode while monitoring threat vehicles ahead to overcome effects of vehicular communication on risk assessment in automated driving vehicle. Although a conventional radar system is known to be best fitted on-board ranging sensor in terms of longitudinal safety, it is generally not enough for a reliable automated driving because of sensing uncertainty of the traffic environments and incomplete perception results due to sensor limitations. This can be overcome by implementing vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication which provides complementary source of target vehicle’s dynamic behavior. Using V2V communication with vehicle internal and surround information obtained from the on-board sensor system, future vehicle motion has been predicted. With accurately predicted motion of a remote vehicle, a collision risk and the automated drive mode are determined by incorporating human factor. Effects of the V2V communication on a human-centered risk assessment algorithm have been investigated through a safe triangle analysis. The computer simulation studies have been conducted in order to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. It has been shown that the V2V communication with the proposed risk assessment algorithm allows a faster drive mode decision and active safety intervention moment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic control and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Republic of Korea Naval Academy, Changwon-si 51704, Korea
Department of Computer Science, College of Natural Science, Republic of Korea Naval Academy, Changwon-si 51704, Korea
Department of Electronic Engineering, College of Convergence Technology, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju-si 27469, Korea
Funding
Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning · Republic of Korea Naval Academy
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations10.1109/TITS.2013.2278494 ↗
2. Vehicular Networking: A Survey and Tutorial on Requirements, Architectures, Challenges, Standards and Solutions10.1109/SURV.2011.061411.00019 ↗
3. (2018, August 01). Toyota and Lexus to launch DSRC technology to connect vehicles and infrastructure in the U.S. in 2021. Available online: http://sites.ieee.org/connected-vehicles/2018/04/16/toyota-and-lexus-to-launch-dsrc-technology-to-connect-vehicles-and-infrastructure-in-the-u-s-in-2021/.
4. (2018, August 01). 5GAA, Audi, Ford and Qualcomm Showcase C-V2X Direct Communications Interoperability to Improve Road Safety | Qualcomm. Available online: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2018/04/26/5gaa-audi-ford-and-qualcomm-showcase-c-v2x-direct-communications.
5. Shin, D., Kim, B., Yi, K., Carvalho, A., and Borrelli, F. (2018). Human-Centered Risk Assessment of an Automated Vehicle Using Vehicular Wireless Communication. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.10.1109/TITS.2018.2823744 ↗
6. Levenberg–Marquardt Backpropagation Training of Multilayer Neural Networks for State Estimation of a Safety-Critical Cyber-Physical System10.1109/TII.2017.2777460 ↗
7. Lane Change Behavior Modeling for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Surroundings Recognition10.20485/jsaeijae.2.2_7 ↗
8. Tomar, R.S., Verma, S., and Tomar, G.S. (2010, January 26–28). Prediction of Lane Change Trajectories through Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Bhopal, India.10.1109/CICN.2010.59 ↗
9. Lane-Change Fuzzy Control in Autonomous Vehicles for the Overtaking Maneuver10.1109/TITS.2008.922880 ↗
10. Layton, R. (2018, August 01). Decision Sight Distance. Available online: https://cce.oregonstate.edu/sites/cce.oregonstate.edu/files/12-3-decision-sight-distance.pdf.
11. An IMM/EKF Approach for Enhanced Multitarget State Estimation for Application to Integrated Risk Management System10.1109/TVT.2014.2329497 ↗
12. Zingoni, A., Diani, M., and Corsini, G. (2017). A Flexible Algorithm for Detecting Challenging Moving Objects in Real-Time within IR Video Sequences. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9111128 ↗
13. Bayless, S.H., Guan, A., Son, P., Murphy, S., and Shaw, A.J. (2018, August 01). Connected Vehicle Insights: Trends in Roadway Domain Active Sensing: Developments in Radar, LiDAR, and Other Sensing Technologies, and Impact on Vehicle Crash Avoidance/Automation and Active Traffic Management. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/1286021.
14. Shi, M., Lu, C., Zhang, Y., and Yao, D. (2017, January 20–22). DSRC and LTE-V Communication Performance Evaluation and Improvement Based on Typical V2X Application at Intersection. Proceedings of the 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8242830 ↗
15. (2018, August 01). 5G Vision: 100 Billion Connections, 1 ms Latency, and 10 Gbps Throughput. Available online: https://www.huawei.com/minisite/5g/en/defining-5g.html.
16. De Ponte Müller, F., Diaz, E.M., and Rashdan, I. (2016, January 19–22). Cooperative Positioning and Radar Sensor Fusion for Relative Localization of Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2016 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1109/IVS.2016.7535520 ↗
17. Kloiber, B., Strang, T., Röckl, M., and de Ponte Müller, F. (2011, January 5–9). Performance of CAM Based Safety Applications Using ITS-G5A MAC in High Dense Scenarios. Proceedings of the 2011 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany.10.1109/IVS.2011.5940461 ↗
18. Takizawa, H., Yamada, K., and Ito, T. (2004, January 14–17). Vehicles Detection Using Sensor Fusion. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Parma, Italy.
19. Floudas, N., Polychronopoulos, A., Aycard, O., Burlet, J., and Ahrholdt, M. (2007, January 13–15). High Level Sensor Data Fusion Approaches for Object Recognition in Road Environment. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/IVS.2007.4290104 ↗
20. Jurgen, R.K. (2012). V2V/V2I Communications for Improved Road Safety and Efficiency, SAE International.
21. Effects of an In-Vehicle Collision Avoidance Warning System on Short-and Long-Term Driving Performance10.1518/0018720024497925 ↗