Show source-provided references
1. Siegesmund, S., and Snethlage, R. (2014). Stone conservation. Stone in Architecture: Properties, Durability, Springer. [5th ed.].
10.1007/978-3-642-45155-3 ↗2. Combined effect of roughness and heterogeneity on contact angles: The case of polymer coating for stone protection
10.1163/156856100742555 ↗8. Review of pore network modelling of porous media: Experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport
10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002 ↗9. Doehne, E., and Price, C.A. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research, The Getty Conservation Institute. [2nd ed.].
10. Andreotti, S., Franzoni, E., and Fabbri, P. (2018). Poly(hydroxyalkanoate)s-based hydrophobic coatings for the protection of stone in cultural heritage. Materials, 11.
10.3390/ma11010165 ↗11. Luxbacher, T. (2014). The Zeta Guide: Principles of the Streaming Potential Technique, Anton Paar GmbH.
12. Contribution à la théorie de l’endosmose électrique et de quelques phénomènes corrélatifs
15. Déon, S., Fievet, P., and Doubad, C.O. (2012). Tangential streaming potential/current measurements for the characterization of composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 413–421.
10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.038 ↗19. Carbonate minerals in porous media decrease mobility of polyacrylic acid modified zero-valent iron nanoparticles used for groundwater remediation
10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.004 ↗24. The calcitic marble/water interface: Kinetics of dissolution and inhibition with potential implications in stone conservation
10.1021/la034015x ↗25. Surface electrical property and adsorption performance of Maifan stone
26. Distribution of nanosilica dispersions in Lecce stone
27. Lezzerini, M., Marroni, M., Raneri, S., Tamayo, S., Narbona, B., Fernández, B., Weber, J., Ghaffari, E., Ban, M., and Rohatsch, A. (2017). Part I: Natural stone test methods. D1.5—Mapping of Stones and Their Decay, Nano-Cathedral. Nano-Cathedral Project Grant Agreement No. 646178-Confidential Deliverable.
29. Quist, W.J., Granneman, S.J.C., and van Hees, R.P.J. (2017, January 13–16). Use of Nanomaterials for the Protection of Historic Stone Architecture: Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation and Investigation of Photocatalytic Activity. Proceedings of the 4th WTA International PhD Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands.
30. Gherardi, F., Roveri, M., Goidanich, S., and Toniolo, L. (2018). Photocatalytic nanocomposites for the protection of european architectural heritage. Materials, 11.
10.3390/ma11010065 ↗31. EN 16581:2014 (2014). Surface protection for porous inorganic materials: Laboratory test methods for the evaluation of the performance of water repellent products. Conservation of Cultural Heritage, European Committee for Standardization.
32. Interpretation of electrokinetic measurements with porous films: Role of electric conductance and streaming current within porous structure
10.1021/la100777z ↗33. EN 15801:2009 (2009). Test methods—Determination of water absorption by capillarity. Conservation of Cultural Property, European Committee for Standardization.
34. The experimental test for the evaluation of protective treatments: A critical survey of the “capillary absorption index”
10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00050-5 ↗35. EN 15802:2009 (2009). Test methods—Determination of static contact angle. Conservation of Cultural Property, European Committee for Standardization.
40. Study of silica nanoparticle adsorption using optical reflectometry and streaming potential techniques
10.1021/la980668f ↗47. The effect of CuO coatings on the electrokinetic properties of stonewool fibres determined by streaming potential measurements
10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.207 ↗