journal article·2018-09-19Open access

Electrokinetic Characterization of Natural Stones Coated with Nanocomposites for the Protection of Cultural Heritage

Marco Roveri, Simona Raneri, Sabrina Bianchi, Francesca Gherardi, Valter Castelvetro, Lucia Toniolo

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 9

Abstract

Protective coatings, in recent years also from nanocomposite formulations, are commonly applied onto architectural stone and stone artefacts, mainly to prevent absorption of condensed water and dissolved atmospheric pollutants into the porous stone structure. While standard protocols to assess a coating’s performance are available, understanding the response of the coating-stone system is a complex task, due to the interplay of various factors determining the overall behaviour. Characterization techniques allowing one to correlate the extent and nature of surface modification upon treatment with the most relevant physical properties (i.e., water absorption and surface wettability) are thus of great interest. Electrokinetic analysis based on streaming current measurements, thanks to its sensitivity towards even minor changes in the surface chemical composition, may fulfil such requirement. Indeed, by involving the interaction with a testing aqueous electrolyte solution, this technique allows one to probe not only the outer surface, but also the outermost layer of the pore network, which plays a crucial role in the interaction of the stone with condensed atmospheric water. In this work, a correlation was found between the extent of surface modification, as determined by streaming current measurements, surface wettability and capillary water absorption, for three lithotypes with different mineralogical and microstructural properties treated with two nanocomposite formulations (one water based and one in alcoholic solvent) containing organosilica precursors and titania nanoparticles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milan, Italy

Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via Santa Maria, 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy

National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), via G. Giusti, 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy

School of Chemistry, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK

Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, Via G. Moruzzi, 13, 56124 Pisa, Italy

Funding

Horizon 2020

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Siegesmund, S., and Snethlage, R. (2014). Stone conservation. Stone in Architecture: Properties, Durability, Springer. [5th ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-45155-3 ↗
2. Combined effect of roughness and heterogeneity on contact angles: The case of polymer coating for stone protection10.1163/156856100742555 ↗
3. Study of silica nanoparticles—Polysiloxane hydrophobic treatments for stone-based monument protection10.1016/j.culher.2011.02.006 ↗
4. Hydrophobizing coatings for cultural heritage. A detailed study of resin/stone surface interaction10.1007/s00339-013-8127-z ↗
5. TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nanocomposite coating with self-cleaning effect for stone material: Finding the optimal amount of TiO210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.172 ↗
6. Surface characterization and effectiveness evaluation of anti-graffiti coatings on highly porous stone materials10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.056 ↗
7. Nano-TiO2 coatings for cultural heritage protection: The role of the binder on hydrophobic and self-cleaning efficacy10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.11.011 ↗
8. Review of pore network modelling of porous media: Experimental characterisations, network constructions and applications to reactive transport10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002 ↗
9. Doehne, E., and Price, C.A. (2010). Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research, The Getty Conservation Institute. [2nd ed.].
10. Andreotti, S., Franzoni, E., and Fabbri, P. (2018). Poly(hydroxyalkanoate)s-based hydrophobic coatings for the protection of stone in cultural heritage. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11010165 ↗
11. Luxbacher, T. (2014). The Zeta Guide: Principles of the Streaming Potential Technique, Anton Paar GmbH.
12. Contribution à la théorie de l’endosmose électrique et de quelques phénomènes corrélatifs
13. Electrokinetic properties of fibres functionalised by chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles10.1007/s10570-015-0760-6 ↗
14. Electrokinetic properties of bare or nanoparticle-functionalized textile fabrics10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.01.022 ↗
15. Déon, S., Fievet, P., and Doubad, C.O. (2012). Tangential streaming potential/current measurements for the characterization of composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 413–421.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.038 ↗
16. A study on the performance of hyaluronic acid immobilized chitosan film10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/035009 ↗
17. Structure and reactivity of the calcite-water interface10.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.047 ↗
18. Zeta potential orientation dependence of sapphire substrates10.1021/la036268w ↗
19. Carbonate minerals in porous media decrease mobility of polyacrylic acid modified zero-valent iron nanoparticles used for groundwater remediation10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.004 ↗
20. Streaming potential studies of colloid, polyelectrolyte and protein deposition10.1016/j.cis.2009.09.004 ↗
21. Advanced electrokinetic characterization of composite porous membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.076 ↗
22. Electrical behaviour of saturated and unsaturated geological carbonate porous systems10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80092-9 ↗
23. Electrokinetics of natural and synthetic calcite suspensions10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00179-9 ↗
24. The calcitic marble/water interface: Kinetics of dissolution and inhibition with potential implications in stone conservation10.1021/la034015x ↗
25. Surface electrical property and adsorption performance of Maifan stone
26. Distribution of nanosilica dispersions in Lecce stone
27. Lezzerini, M., Marroni, M., Raneri, S., Tamayo, S., Narbona, B., Fernández, B., Weber, J., Ghaffari, E., Ban, M., and Rohatsch, A. (2017). Part I: Natural stone test methods. D1.5—Mapping of Stones and Their Decay, Nano-Cathedral. Nano-Cathedral Project Grant Agreement No. 646178-Confidential Deliverable.
28. Mercury porosimetry: A general (practical) overview10.1002/ppsc.200601009 ↗
29. Quist, W.J., Granneman, S.J.C., and van Hees, R.P.J. (2017, January 13–16). Use of Nanomaterials for the Protection of Historic Stone Architecture: Laboratory Methods for the Evaluation and Investigation of Photocatalytic Activity. Proceedings of the 4th WTA International PhD Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands.
30. Gherardi, F., Roveri, M., Goidanich, S., and Toniolo, L. (2018). Photocatalytic nanocomposites for the protection of european architectural heritage. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11010065 ↗
31. EN 16581:2014 (2014). Surface protection for porous inorganic materials: Laboratory test methods for the evaluation of the performance of water repellent products. Conservation of Cultural Heritage, European Committee for Standardization.
32. Interpretation of electrokinetic measurements with porous films: Role of electric conductance and streaming current within porous structure10.1021/la100777z ↗
33. EN 15801:2009 (2009). Test methods—Determination of water absorption by capillarity. Conservation of Cultural Property, European Committee for Standardization.
34. The experimental test for the evaluation of protective treatments: A critical survey of the “capillary absorption index”10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00050-5 ↗
35. EN 15802:2009 (2009). Test methods—Determination of static contact angle. Conservation of Cultural Property, European Committee for Standardization.
36. Influence of surface roughness on streaming potential method10.1002/ceat.200800180 ↗
37. Compilation of PZC and IEP of sparingly soluble metal oxides and hydroxides from literature10.1016/j.cis.2009.08.003 ↗
38. The point of zero charge of phyllosilicate minerals using the Mular-Roberts titration technique10.1016/j.mineng.2009.11.013 ↗
39. Electrokinetic behaviour of calcite—The relation with other calcite properties10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00397-1 ↗
40. Study of silica nanoparticle adsorption using optical reflectometry and streaming potential techniques10.1021/la980668f ↗
41. Characterization of the deposition of silicone copolymers on keratin fibers by streaming potential measurements10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.04.071 ↗
42. Preparation and characterization of surface modified silica nanoparticles with organo-silane compounds10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.04.010 ↗
43. The significance of the difference in the point of zero charge between rutile and anatase10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00080-5 ↗
44. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
45. The application of the contact angle in monument protection: New materials and methods10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.035 ↗
46. Silica monolayer formation and stability determined by in situ streaming potential measurements10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.025 ↗
47. The effect of CuO coatings on the electrokinetic properties of stonewool fibres determined by streaming potential measurements10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.207 ↗