The Effect of Fuel Mass Fraction on the Combustion and Fluid Flow in a Sulfur Recovery Unit Thermal Reactor
Source abstract
Abstract
Sulfur recovery unit (SRU) thermal reactors are negatively affected by high temperature operation. In this paper, the effect of the fuel mass fraction on the combustion and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor is investigated numerically. Practical operating conditions for a petrochemical corporation in Taiwan are used as the design conditions for the discussion. The simulation results show that the present design condition is a fuel-rich (or air-lean) condition and gives acceptable sulfur recovery, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) destruction, sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and thermal reactor temperature for an oxygen-normal operation. However, for an oxygen-rich operation, the local maximum temperature exceeds the suggested maximum service temperature, although the average temperature is acceptable. The high temperature region must be inspected very carefully during the annual maintenance period if there are oxygen-rich operations. If the fuel mass fraction to the zone ahead of the choke ring (zone 1) is 0.0625 or 0.125, the average temperature in the zone behind the choke ring (zone 2) is higher than the zone 1 average temperature, which can damage the downstream heat exchanger tubes. If the zone 1 fuel mass fraction is reduced to ensure a lower zone 1 temperature, the temperature in zone 2 and the heat exchanger section must be monitored closely and the zone 2 wall and heat exchanger tubes must be inspected very carefully during the annual maintenance period. To determine a suitable fuel mass fraction for operation, a detailed numerical simulation should be performed first to find the stoichiometric fuel mass fraction which produces the most complete combustion and the highest temperature. This stoichiometric fuel mass fraction should be avoided because the high temperature could damage the zone 1 corner or the choke ring. A higher fuel mass fraction (i.e., fuel-rich or air-lean condition) is more suitable because it can avoid deteriorations of both zone 1 and heat exchanger tubes. Although a lower fuel mass fraction (i.e., fuel-lean or air-rich condition) can avoid deterioration of zone 1, the heat exchanger tubes may be damaged. This paper provides a guideline for adjusting the fuel mass fraction to reduce the high temperature inside the thermal reactor and to ensure an acceptable sulfur recovery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Industrial Gas Emission Control · Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 632, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Simulation of hydrogen production from thermal decomposition of hydrogen sulfide in sulfur recovery units10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.021 ↗
2. Role of toluene and carbon dioxide on sulfur recovery efficiency in a Claus process10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.630 ↗
3. Effect of reaction parameters on the quality of captured sulfur in Claus process10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.015 ↗
4. New experimental data and kinetic rate expression for the Claus reaction10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00146-9 ↗
5. Yeh, C.L. (2016). Effect of choke ring dimension on thermal and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor. Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng., submitted for publication.10.18178/ijmerr.4.3.273-277 ↗
6. Effect of choke ring position on thermal and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor
7. Yeh, C.L. (November, January 30). Effect of streamlining geometry on thermal and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor. Proceedings of International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation 2015 (IMETI2015), Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J5043.10.18178/ijmerr.4.3.273-277 ↗
8. Yeh, C.L. (2016). Numerical analysis of the effects of streamlining geometry and a vector wall on the thermal and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor. Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng., 40, submitted for publication.10.1139/tcsme-2016-0066 ↗
9. Yeh, C.L. (November, January 30). Effect of a vector wall on the thermal and fluid flow in a SRU thermal reactor. Proceedings of International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation 2015 (IMETI2015), Kaohsiung, Taiwan. J5042.
10. Patankar, S.V. (1980). Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flows, McGraw-Hill.
11. Launder, B.E., and Spalding, D.B. (1972). Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic Press.
12. Siegel, R., and Howell, J.R. (1992). Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
13. Generalized state relationships for scalar properties in non-premixed hydrocarbon/air flames10.1016/0010-2180(90)90099-D ↗
14. The numerical computation of turbulent flows10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2 ↗
15. Numerical analysis of the combustion and fluid flow in a carbon monoxide boiler10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.020 ↗
16. Batchelor, G.K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press.