One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network with Adaptive Moment Estimation for Modelling of the Sand Retention Test
Source abstract
Abstract
Stand-alone screens (SASs) are active sand control methods where compatible screens and slot sizes are selected through the sand retention test (SRT) to filter an unacceptable amount of sand produced from oil and gas wells. SRTs have been modelled in the laboratory using computer simulation to replicate experimental conditions and ensure that the selected screens are suitable for selected reservoirs. However, the SRT experimental setups and result analyses are not standardized. A few changes made to the experimental setup can cause a huge variation in results, leading to different plugging performance and sand retention analysis. Besides, conducting many laboratory experiments is expensive and time-consuming. Since the application of CNN in the petroleum industry attained promising results for both classification and regression problems, this method is proposed on SRT to reduce the time, cost, and effort to run the laboratory test by predicting the plugging performance and sand production. The application of deep learning has yet to be imposed in SRT. Therefore, in this study, a deep learning model using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) with adaptive moment estimation is developed to model the SRT with the aim of classifying plugging sign (screen plug, the screen does not plug) as well as to predict sand production and retained permeability using a varying sand distribution, SAS, screen slot size, and sand concentration as inputs. The performance of the proposed 1D-CNN model for the slurry test shows that the prediction of retained permeability and the classification of plugging sign achieved robust accuracy with more than a 90% value of R2, while the prediction of sand production achieved 77% accuracy. In addition, the model for the sand pack test achieved 84% accuracy in predicting sand production. For comparative model performance, gradient boosting (GB), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were also modelled on the same datasets. The results showed that the proposed 1D-CNN model outperforms the other four machine learning models for both SRT tests in terms of prediction accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
Centre for Research in Data Science, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
Department of Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
Advanced Computational Modelling, PETRONAS Research Sdn. Bhd., Bandar Baru Bangi 43000, Malaysia
Funding
PETRONAS Research Sdn Bhd
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu, B., Choi, S., Feng, Y., Denke, R., Barton, T., Wong, C., Boulanger, J., Yang, W., Lim, S., and Zamberi, M. (2016, January 22–25). Evaluating sand screen performance using improved sand retention test and numerical modelling. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Offshore Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.4043/26434-MS ↗
2. Chanpura, R.A., Mondal, S., Andrews, J.S., Mathisen, A.M., Ayoub, J.A., Parlar, M., and Sharma, M.M. (2012, January 15–17). Modeling of square mesh screens in slurry test conditions for stand-alone screen applications. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/151637-MS ↗
3. Ballard, T., and Beare, S. (2003, January 13–14). Media sizing for premium sand screens: Dutch twill weaves. Proceedings of the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, The Hague, The Netherlands.10.2118/82244-MS ↗
4. Ballard, T., and Beare, S.P. (2006, January 15–17). Sand retention testing: The more you do, the worse it gets. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2523/98308-MS ↗
5. Markestad, P., Christie, O., Espedal, A., and Rørvik, O. (1996, January 14–15). Selection of screen slot width to prevent plugging and sand production. Proceedings of the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2523/31087-MS ↗
6. Ballard, T.J., and Beare, S.P. (2012, January 15–17). An investigation of sand retention testing with a view to developing better guidelines for screen selection. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/151768-MS ↗
7. Ballard, T., Beare, S., and Wigg, N. (2016, January 24–26). Sand Retention Testing: Reservoir Sand or Simulated Sand-Does it Matter?. Proceedings of the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/178966-MS ↗
8. Agunloye, E., and Utunedi, E. (2014, January 5–7). Optimizing sand control design using sand screen retention testing. Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Victoria Island, Nigeria.10.2118/172488-MS ↗
9. Mathisen, A.M., Aastveit, G.L., and Alteraas, E. (June, January 30). Successful installation of stand alone sand screen in more than 200 wells-the importance of screen selection process and fluid qualification. Proceedings of the European Formation Damage Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
10. Fischer, C., and Hamby, H. (2018, January 7–9). A Novel Approach to Constant Flow-Rate Sand Retention Testing. Proceedings of the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/189515-MS ↗
11. A new laboratory protocol to study the plugging and sand control performance of sand control screens10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106548 ↗
12. Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.011 ↗
13. 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: A survey10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107398 ↗
14. Long Short Term Memory Recurrent Network for Standard and Poor’s 500 Index Modelling10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21365 ↗
15. Abdulkadir, S.J., Yong, S.P., Marimuthu, M., and Lai, F.W. (2014). Hybridization of ensemble Kalman filter and nonlinear auto-regressive neural network for financial forecasting. Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-13817-6_8 ↗
16. Abdulkadir, S.J., and Yong, S.P. (2014, January 3–5). Empirical analysis of parallel-NARX recurrent network for long-term chaotic financial forecasting. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ICCOINS.2014.6868354 ↗
17. Hybrid neural network model for metocean data analysis
18. Scaled UKF–NARX hybrid model for multi-step-ahead forecasting of chaotic time series data10.1007/s00500-015-1833-z ↗
19. Abdulkadir, S.J., Yong, S.P., and Alhussian, H. (2016, January 15–17). An enhanced ELMAN-NARX hybrid model for FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI index forecasting. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783232 ↗
20. Abdulkadir, S.J., and Yong, S.P. (2015, January 19–20). Lorenz time-series analysis using a scaled hybrid model. Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC), Ipoh, Malaysia.10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594082 ↗
21. Hyperparameter optimization of deep neural network using univariate dynamic encoding algorithm for searches10.1016/j.knosys.2019.04.019 ↗
22. Mhiri, M., Abuelwafa, S., Desrosiers, C., and Cheriet, M. (December, January 28). Footnote-based document image classification using 1D convolutional neural networks and histograms. Proceedings of the 2017 Seventh International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/IPTA.2017.8310140 ↗
23. Brain tumor segmentation using convolutional neural networks in MRI images10.1109/TMI.2016.2538465 ↗
24. Shin Yoon, J., Rameau, F., Kim, J., Lee, S., Shin, S., and So Kweon, I. (2017, January 22–29). Pixel-level matching for video object segmentation using convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.238 ↗
25. Hyperparameter optimization in convolutional neural network using genetic algorithms
26. CNN Prediction Enhancement by Post-Processing for Hydrocarbon Detection in Seismic Images10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005916 ↗
27. Zhou, X., Zhao, C., and Liu, X. (2019, January 11–14). Application of CNN Deep Learning to Well Pump Troubleshooting via Power Cards. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Abu Dhabi, UAE.10.2118/197733-MS ↗
28. Automatic well test interpretation based on convolutional neural network for a radial composite reservoir10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60079-9 ↗
29. Determination of Oil Well Placement using Convolutional Neural Network Coupled with Robust Optimization under Geological Uncertainty
30. CNN-Based Volume Flow Rate Prediction of Oil–Gas–Water Three-Phase Intermittent Flow from Multiple Sensors10.3390/s21041245 ↗
31. Chanpura, R.A., Hodge, R.M., Andrews, J.S., Toffanin, E.P., Moen, T., and Parlar, M. (2010, January 10–12). State of the art screen selection for stand-alone screen applications. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/127931-MS ↗
32. Hodge, R.M., Burton, R.C., Constien, V., and Skidmore, V. (2002, January 20–21). An evaluation method for screen-only and gravel-pack completions. Proceedings of the International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2118/73772-MS ↗
33. Gillespie, G., Deem, C.K., and Malbrel, C. (2000, January 16–18). Screen selection for sand control based on laboratory tests. Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Brisbane, Australia.10.2523/64398-MS ↗
34. New analytical and statistical approach for estimating and analyzing sand production through wire-wrap screens during a sand-retention test
35. Constien, V.G., and Skidmore, V. (2006, January 15–17). Standalone screen selection using performance mastercurves. Proceedings of the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, LA, USA.10.2523/98363-MS ↗
36. Mondal, S., Sharma, M.M., Hodge, R.M., Chanpura, R.A., Parlar, M., and Ayoub, J.A. (November, January 30). A new method for the design and selection of premium/woven sand screens. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, CO, USA.
37. Heumann, C., and Schomaker, M. (2016). Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-46162-5 ↗
38. Suchmacher, M., and Geller, M. (2012). Correlation and Regression. Practical Biostatistics: A Friendly Step-by-Step Approach For Evidence-based Medicine, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-415794-1.00014-8 ↗
39. Forsyth, D. (2018). Probability and Statistics for Computer Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-64410-3 ↗
40. Bonamente, M. (2017). Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-6572-4 ↗
41. Statistics at square one: XVIII-Correlation10.1136/bmj.2.6037.680 ↗
42. Chollet, F. (2018). Deep Learning with Python, Manning Publication, Co.
43. Variants of Particle Swarm Optimization in Enhancing Artificial Neural Networks
44. A guide to convolutional neural networks for computer vision10.1007/978-3-031-01821-3 ↗
45. Michelucci, U. (2019). Advanced Applied Deep Learning: Convolutional Neural Networks and Object Detection, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4842-4976-5 ↗
46. Classification of children’s drawing strategies on touch-screen of seriation objects using a novel deep learning hybrid model10.1016/j.aej.2020.06.019 ↗
47. Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 ↗
48. Aggarwal, C.C. (2018). Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-94463-0 ↗
49. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on combination of deep belief network and one-dimensional convolutional neural network10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953490 ↗
50. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
51. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)
52. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 ↗
53. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance10.3354/cr030079 ↗
54. Onyutha, C. (2020). From R-squared to coefficient of model accuracy for assessing” goodness-of-fits”. Geosci. Model. Dev. Discuss., 1–25.10.5194/gmd-2020-51 ↗
55. He, Z., Lin, D., Lau, T., and Wu, M. (2019). Gradient Boosting Machine: A Survey. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06951.
56. Barber, D. (2012). Bayesian Reasoning and Machine Learning, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804779 ↗
57. Shalev-Shwartz, S., and Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107298019 ↗
58. Kubat, M.A. (2017). Introduction to Machine Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-63913-0 ↗