Application of Fuzzy Theory and Optimum Computing to the Obstacle Avoidance Control of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Autonomous underwater vehicles and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) are unmanned underwater vehicles widely used in marine environments. Establishing an efficient obstacle avoidance approach in underwater environments remains a challenge for these vehicles. Most studies have relied on simulated results; few have been conducted with vehicles in a real environment. This study used an ROV equipped with a scanning sonar as an experimental platform and applied fuzzy logic control to solve nonlinear and uncertain problems, which are difficult to address using conventional control theory. Using data from the depth and inertial sensors, fuzzy logic control can output defuzzification command values that are passed through a fuzzy inference engine to control ROV motion. Fuzzy logic control was used to evaluate depth and heading degrees in navigation experiments. In heading navigation, scanning sonar was used to detect obstacles in the scanning range. An optimum navigation strategy was also developed to calculate appropriate headings to safely and stably navigate during a mission to attain a predetermined destination. The results indicated that the ROV with fuzzy logic control had superior control stability and obstacle avoidance in an underwater environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, National Defense University, Tahsi, Taoyuan 33509, Taiwan
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Finite element cable-model for Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) by application of beam theory10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.012 ↗
2. Steele, J.H., Thorpe, S.A., and Thompson, K.K. (2009). Vehicles for Deep Sea Exploration. Elements of Physical Oceanography: A Derivative of the Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, Elsevier Ltd.
3. Hassanein, O., Anavatti, S.G., and Ray, T. (2013). On-line adaptive fuzzy modeling and control for autonomous underwater vehicle. Recent Advances in Robotics and Automation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-37387-9_4 ↗
4. Nag, A., Patel, S.S., and Akbar, S.A. (2013, January 22–23). Fuzzy logic based depth control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Proceedings of the 2013 International Mutli-Conference on Automation, Computing, Communication, Control and Compressed Sensing, Kottayam, Kerala, India.10.1109/iMac4s.2013.6526393 ↗
5. Shi, X., Chen, J., Yan, Z., and Li, T. (2010, January 20–23). Design of AUV height control based on adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Harbin, China.10.1109/ICINFA.2010.5512245 ↗
6. Research on fuzzy control of path tracking for underwater vehicle based on genetic algorithm optimization10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.010 ↗
7. A controller comprising tail wing control of a hybrid autonomous underwater vehicle for use as an underwater glider10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.03.001 ↗
8. Lin, X., Nie, J., Jiao, Y., Liang, K., and Li, H. (2018). Adaptive fuzzy output feedback stabilization control for the underactuated surface vessel. Appl. Ocean. Res.10.1016/j.apor.2018.01.015 ↗
9. Makavita, C.D., Jayasinghe, S.G., Nguyen, H.D., and Ranmuthugala, D. (2019). Experimental Study of a Command Governor Adaptive Depth Controller for an Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. Appl. Ocean. Res.10.1016/j.apor.2019.02.016 ↗
10. An obstacle-avoidance technique for autonomous underwater vehicles based on BK-products of fuzzy relation10.1016/j.fss.2005.05.042 ↗
11. Adaptive control of a submerged vehicle with sliding fuzzy relations10.1016/0165-0114(95)00288-X ↗
12. An obstacle avoidance strategy for the wave glider based on the improved artificial potential field and collision prediction model10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107356 ↗
13. Sebastián, V.A. (2016, January 15–17). Artificial potential fields for the obstacles avoidance system of an AUV using a mechanical scanning sonar. Proceedings of the 2016 3rd IEEE/OES South American International Symposium on Oceanic Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
14. Subramanian, S., George, T., and Thondiyath, A. (2012). Obstacle avoidance using multi-point potential field approach for an underactuated flat-fish type AUV in dynamic environment. International Conference on Intelligent Robotics, Automation, and Manufacturing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35197-6_3 ↗
15. Obstacle avoidance approaches for autonomous underwater vehicle: Simulation and experimental results10.1109/JOE.2015.2506204 ↗
16. Grefstad, Ø., and Schjølberg, I. (2018, January 6–9). Navigation and collision avoidance of underwater vehicles using sonar data. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Workshop, Porto, Portugal.10.1109/AUV.2018.8729813 ↗
17. Klir, G.J. (2006). Fuzzy Set Theory, Wiley-IEEE Press.
18. Arora, J.S. (2016). Introduction to Optimum Design, Elsevier.