journal article·2020-08-01Open access

Inferring Emotion Tags from Object Images Using Convolutional Neural Network

Anam Manzoor, Waqar Ahmad, Muhammad Ehatisham-ul-Haq, Abdul Hannan, Muhammad Asif Khan, M. Usman Ashraf, Ahmed M. Alghamdi, Ahmed S. Alfakeeh

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 15

Abstract

Emotions are a fundamental part of human behavior and can be stimulated in numerous ways. In real-life, we come across different types of objects such as cake, crab, television, trees, etc., in our routine life, which may excite certain emotions. Likewise, object images that we see and share on different platforms are also capable of expressing or inducing human emotions. Inferring emotion tags from these object images has great significance as it can play a vital role in recommendation systems, image retrieval, human behavior analysis and, advertisement applications. The existing schemes for emotion tag perception are based on the visual features, like color and texture of an image, which are poorly affected by lightning conditions. The main objective of our proposed study is to address this problem by introducing a novel idea of inferring emotion tags from the images based on object-related features. In this aspect, we first created an emotion-tagged dataset from the publicly available object detection dataset (i.e., “Caltech-256”) using subject evaluation from 212 users. Next, we used a convolutional neural network-based model to automatically extract the high-level features from object images for recognizing nine (09) emotion categories, such as amusement, awe, anger, boredom, contentment, disgust, excitement, fear, and sadness. Experimental results on our emotion-tagged dataset endorse the success of our proposed idea in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score. Overall, the proposed scheme achieved an accuracy rate of approximately 85% and 79% using top-level and bottom-level emotion tagging, respectively. We also performed a gender-based analysis for inferring emotion tags and observed that male and female subjects have discernment in emotions perception concerning different object categories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Emotion and Mood Recognition · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila 47050, Pakistan

Department of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore (Sialkot) 51040, Pakistan

Department of Software Engineering, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21493, Saudi Arabia

Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Toward agents that recognize emotion
2. Izard, C.E. (1991). The Psychology of Emotions, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4899-0615-1 ↗
3. Inferring emotional tags from social images with user demographics10.1109/TMM.2017.2655881 ↗
4. Borth, D., Ji, R., Chen, T., Breuel, T., and Chang, S. (2013, January 21–25). Large-scale visual sentiment ontology and detectors using adjective noun pairs. Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, Barcelona, Spain.10.1145/2502081.2502282 ↗
5. A natural visible and infrared facial expression database for expression recognition and emotion inference10.1109/TMM.2010.2060716 ↗
6. Siersdorfer, S., Minack, E., Deng, F., and Hare, J. (2010, January 25–29). Analyzing and predicting sentiment of images on the social web. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Firenze, Italy.10.1145/1873951.1874060 ↗
7. Li, B. (November, January 29). Scaring or pleasing: Exploit emotional impact of an image. Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Multimedia, Nara, Japan.
8. Cai, W., Jia, J., and Han, W. (2018, January 23–27). Inferring emotions from image social networks using group-based factor graph model Department of Computer Science and Technology. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2018, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/ICME.2018.8486450 ↗
9. Emotion recognition in text for 3-D facial expression rendering10.1109/TMM.2010.2052026 ↗
10. Busso, C., Deng, Z., Yildirim, S., Bulut, M., Lee, C.M., Kazemzadeh, A., Lee, S., Neumann, U., and Narayanan, S. (2004, January 13–15). Analysis of emotion recognition using facial expressions, speech and multimodal information. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2004, State College, PA, USA.10.1145/1027933.1027968 ↗
11. Error weighted semi-coupled hidden markov model for audio-visual emotion recognition10.1109/TMM.2011.2171334 ↗
12. You, Q., Luo, J., Jin, H., and Yang, J. (2016). Building a large scale dataset for image emotion recognition: The fine print and the benchmark. arXiv.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9987 ↗
13. Machajdik, J., and Hanbury, A. (2010, January 25–29). Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Firenze, Italy.10.1145/1873951.1873965 ↗
14. Chen, M., Zhang, L., and Allebach, J.P. (2015, January 27–30). Learning deep features for image emotion classification. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Quebec City, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351656 ↗
15. The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.016 ↗
16. A general psychocvolutionary theory of emotion
17. An argument for basic emotions10.1080/02699939208411068 ↗
18. Multiple emotion tagging for multimedia data by exploiting high-order dependencies among emotions10.1109/TMM.2015.2484966 ↗
19. Modeling emotion influence in image social networks
20. Vanus, J., Belesova, J., Martinek, R., Nedoma, J., Fajkus, M., Bilik, P., and Zidek, J. (2017). Monitoring of the daily living activities in smart home care. Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci., 7.10.1186/s13673-017-0113-6 ↗
21. Emotional category data on images from the international affective picture system10.3758/BF03192732 ↗
22. Zhao, S., Gao, Y., Jiang, X., Yao, H., Chua, T., and Sun, X. (2014, January 3–7). Exploring principles-of-art features for image emotion recognition. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/2647868.2654930 ↗
23. You, Q., Luo, J., Jin, H., and Yang, J. (2015, January 25–30). Robust image sentiment analysis using progressively trained and domain transferred deep networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial intelligence, Austin, TX, USA.10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9179 ↗
24. Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening10.1080/0929821042000317813 ↗
25. Zhao, S. (2016, January 22–25). Affective computing of image emotion perceptions. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2835776.2855082 ↗
26. Wu, B., Jia, J., Yang, Y., Zhao, P., and Tang, J. (July, January 29). Understanding the emotions behind social images: Inferring with user demographics. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Turin, Italy.10.1109/ICME.2015.7177462 ↗
27. Lu, X., Suryanarayan, P., Adams, R.B., Li, J., Newman, M.G., and Wang, J.Z. (November, January 29). On shape and the computability of emotions categories and subject descriptors. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nara, Japan.
28. Sharif, A., Hossein, R., Josephine, A., Stefan, S., and Royal, K.T.H. (2014). CNN features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6382.
29. (2020, July 30). Affective Computing. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affectivecomputing.
30. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
31. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. (2012, January 3–6). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the NIPS 2012: Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA.
32. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2014, January 24–27). Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
33. Sergey, K., Matthew, T., Helen, H., Aseem, A., Trevor, D., Aaron, H., and Holger, W. (2013). Recognizing image style. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3715.
34. Akhtar, S., Hussain, F., Raja, F.R., Ehatisham-Ul-haq, M., Baloch, N.K., Ishmanov, F., and Bin Zikria, Y. (2020). Improving mispronunciation detection of arabic words for non-native learners using deep convolutional neural network features. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9060963 ↗
35. Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairment10.1080/02643298808253278 ↗
36. Appraisal patterns of emotions in human-product interaction
37. Gender and culture differences in emotion10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87 ↗
38. Gender and Emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self—Reports of feelings and expressive behavior?10.1086/382111 ↗
39. Dong, Y., Yang, Y., Tang, J., and Chawla, N.V. (2014, January 24–27). Inferring user demographics and social strategies in mobile social networks. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2623330.2623703 ↗
40. (2020, July 30). Caltech256. Available online: http://academictorrents.com/details/7de9936b060525b6fa7f5d8aabd316637d677622.
41. Griffin, G., Alex, H., and Perona, P. (2007). Caltech-256 Object Category Dataset, California Institute of Technology.
42. A bayesian network-based framework for semantic image understanding10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.001 ↗
43. (2020, July 30). CNN Networks. Available online: https://medium.com/@sidereal/cnns-architectures-lenet-alexnet-vgg-googlenet-resnet-and-more-666091488df5.
44. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
45. Donahue, J., Jia, Y., Vinyals, O., Hoffman, J., Zhang, N., Tzeng, E., and Darrell, T. (2013). Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1531.
46. Performance of machine learning methods in determining the autism spectrum disorder cases10.22531/muglajsci.422546 ↗
47. Neuroimage-based clinical prediction using machine learning tools10.1002/ima.22213 ↗
48. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery