Alternative Pedicle Screw Design via Biomechanical Evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
With the recent increase in the elderly population, many people suffer from spinal diseases, and, accordingly, spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws has been widely applied to treat them. However, most research on pedicle screw design has been focused on the test results rather than the behavior of the screws and vertebrae. In this study, a design platform with a series of biomechanical tests and analyses were presented for pedicle screw improvement and evaluation. The platform was then applied to an alternative hybrid screw design with quadruple and double threads. An experimental apparatus was developed to investigate the bending strength of the screw, and several tests were performed based on the ASTM F1717 standard. In the experiments, it was confirmed that the alternative pedicle screw has the highest bending strength. To examine the stress distribution of pedicle screws, finite element models were established, through which it was found that the proposed pedicle screw has sufficient mechanical safety to make it acceptable for spinal fusion treatment. Finally, we conclude that the platform has good potential for the design and evaluation of pedicle screws, and the alternative dual screw design is one of the best options for spinal fusion surgery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Special Purpose Machinery Research Center, Korea Construction Equipment Technology Research, 36 Sandan-ro, Gunsan-si, Jeollabuk-do 54004, Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ajou University, 206 Worldcup-ro, Suwon-si, Yeong-tong-gu, Gyeonggi-do 16499, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.801 ↗
2. Low back pain hospitalization: Recent United States trends and regional variations10.1097/00007632-199405310-00002 ↗
3. Biomechanics of Degenerative Spinal Disorders10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.377 ↗
4. The comparison of pullout strengths of various pedicle screw designs on synthetic foams and ovine vertebrae
5. Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.12.007 ↗
6. Effect of Pedicle Fill on Axial Pullout Strength in Spinal Fixation After Rod Reduction10.3928/01477447-20170925-02 ↗
7. Gary, K., and Michelson, M.D. (2009). CD HORIZON® SOLERA™ Spinal System Surgical Technique, Medtronic.
8. Biomechanical evaluation of a double-threaded pedicle screw in elderly vertebrae10.1097/00024720-200202000-00012 ↗
9. A Biomechanical study on the fixation strength of the trans-pedicular screw: In vitro measurement10.4055/jkoa.1995.30.3.459 ↗
10. Morphologic feasibility of pedicle screw insertion in Korean10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.2.255 ↗
11. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation
12. Bianco, R.J., Arnoux, P.J., Wagnac, E., Mac-Thiong, J.M., and Aubin, C.É. (2017). Minimizing Pedicle Screw Pullout Risks: A Detailed Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Design and Placement. Clin. Spine Surg., E226–E232.10.1097/BSD.0000000000000151 ↗
13. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.004 ↗
14. (2004). ASTM F1717-04. Standard Test Methods for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model, ASTM International.
15. (2020, May 07). Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-molecular-weight_polyethylene.
16. Insertional torque of the lumbar pedicle screw during surgery10.1007/s00776-004-0883-3 ↗
17. (2005). ASME B1.13M. Metric Screw Threads: M Profile, ASME International.
18. Effect of various factors on pull out strength of pedicle screw in normal and osteoporotic cancellous bone models10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.11.012 ↗
19. Dayyoub, T., Maksimkin, A.V., Kaloshkin, S., Kolesnikov, E., Chukov, D., Dyachkova, T.P., and Gutnik, I. (2019). The structure and mechanical properties of the UHMWPE films modified by the mixture of graphene nanoplates with polyaniline. Polymers, 11.10.3390/polym11010023 ↗
20. Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Among Different Transpedicular Trajectories10.1097/BSD.0000000000000258 ↗
21. Mechanical Effect of Different Implant Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal Angles on the Fracture Surface After Fixation of an Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.008 ↗
22. (2013). ASTM F543-17. Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screw, ASTM International.
23. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads10.1097/00007632-199503150-00010 ↗
24. Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study10.1097/00007632-198403000-00003 ↗
25. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00806-X ↗
26. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
27. Walsh, W., Loefler, A., Stanford, R., Stanford, P., Svehla, M., and Sutiono, T. (2000, January 12–15). Mechanical Analysis of Polyaxial Pedicle Screws using ASTM F1717. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orlando, FL, USA.