Prediction of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Aggregate Pier Reinforced Clay Using Multiple Regression Analysis and Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Aggregate piers have been widely used to increase bearing pressure and reduce settlement under structural footings. The ultimate bearing capacity of aggregate pier-reinforced ground is affected by the soil strength, replacement ratio of piles, and construction conditions. Various prediction models have been proposed to predict the ultimate bearing capacity. However, existing models have shown a broad range of bias, variation, and error, and they are at times unsuitable for practical design. In this study, multiple regression analysis was performed using field loading test results to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of ground reinforced by aggregate piers, and the number and type of the most efficient input variables were evaluated to build a robust predictive model. Accordingly, a multiple regression equation for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity was proposed, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the effect of input variables. In addition, a deep neural network was applied to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity. The optimal structure was selected on the basis of cross-validation results to prevent overtraining. Prediction errors for two approaches were evaluated and then compared with those of existing models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ecology & Environment Research Division, Gyeonggi Research Institute, Suwon 16207, Korea
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin 17058, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Kitazume, M. (2005). The Sand Compaction Pile Method, Taylor and Francis.10.1201/9780367803193 ↗
2. Greenwood, D.A. (1970, January 16). Mechanical Improvement of Soils Below Ground Surface. Proceedings of the Ground Engineering Conference, London, UK.
3. Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001740 ↗
4. A Field Trial of the Reinforcing Effect of a Stone Column in Soil10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.31 ↗
5. Brauns, J. (1978, January 16–19). Initial bearing capacity of stone columns and sand piles. Proceedings of the Symposium on Soil Reinforcing and Stabilizing Techniques in Engineering Practice, Sydney, Australia.
6. Barksdale, R.D., and Bachus, R.C. (1983). Design and Construction of Stone Columns.
7. Mitchell, J.K. (1981, January 15–19). Soil improvement—State-of-the-art report. Proceedings of the 10th Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Full scale load test of granular piles with different densities and different proportions of gravel and sand in the soft Bangkok clay10.3208/sandf1972.27.86 ↗
9. Comparison of bearing capacity characteristics of sand and gravel compaction pile treated ground10.1007/BF02829050 ↗
10. Ali, K., Shahu, J.T., and Sharma, K.G. (2010, January 16–18). Behaviour of Reinforced Stone Columns in Soft Soils: An Experimental Study. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Indian Geotechnical Society, Mumbai, India.
11. The settlement performance of stone column foundations10.1680/geot.9.P.014 ↗
12. Estimation of bearing capacity of floating group of stone columns
13. Behavior of Stone Columns Based on Experimental and FEM Analysis10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405) ↗
14. Mode of failure of a group of stone columns in soft soil10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000175 ↗
15. Experimental and Numerical Studies on Response of the Stone Column in Layered Soil10.1007/s40891-015-0029-z ↗
16. 3D FE Analysis on Settlement of Footing Supported with Rammed Aggregate Pier Group10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001189 ↗
17. Bearing Capacity of a Group of Stone Columns in Soft Soil10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000393 ↗
18. Bearing Capacity of Spread Footings on Aggregate Pier Reinforced Clay10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000748 ↗
19. Krill herd algorithm-based neural network in structural seismic reliability evaluation10.1080/15376494.2018.1430874 ↗
20. Artificial Neural Networks for Construction Management: A Review
21. Assessment and Prediction of Liquefaction Potential Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models: A Case Study10.1007/s10706-016-0004-z ↗
22. Estimation of Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Spread Footing over Stone Column Reinforced clay Using Fuzzy Models and Artificial Neural Networks
23. Prediction of Bearing Capacity of Stone Columns Placed in Soft Clay Using ANN Model10.1007/s10706-017-0436-0 ↗
24. Aboshi, H., and Suematsu, N. (1985, January 27–29). Sand compaction pile method state-of-the-art paper. Proceedings of the 3rd International Geotechnical Seminar on Soil Improvement Methods, Nanyang, Singapore.
25. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
26. Werbos, P. (1974). Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. [Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University].
27. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
28. Gloro, X., and Bengio, Y. (2010, January 13–15). Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Sardinia, Italy.
29. Hochreiter, S., Bengio, Y., Frasconi, P., and Schmidhuber, J. (2001). Gradient flow in recurrent nets: The difficulty of learning long-term dependencies. Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Neural Networks, IEEE Press.
30. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel.
31. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
32. Model performance analysis and model validation in logistic regression
33. Helsel, D.R., and Hirsch, R.M. (2002). Statistical Methods in Water Resources.
34. Stuedlein, A.W. (2008). Bearing Capacity and Displacement of Spread Footings on Aggregate Pier Reinforced Clay. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington].
35. Bearing Capacity of Spread Footings on Aggregate Pier Reinforced Clay: Updates and Stress Concentration10.1139/cgj-2019-0026 ↗
36. Martin, J.P. (2018). A Full-Scale Experimental Investigation of the Bearing Performance of Aggregate Pier-supported Shallow Foundation. [Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University].
37. Montgomery, D.C., and Runger, G.C. (2010). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Wiley. [5th ed.].
38. Bassaganya-Riera, J. (2015). Computational Immunology: Models and Tools, Elsevier/Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-803697-6.00002-3 ↗