journal article·2020-01-28Open access

Bringing Biometric Sensors to the Classroom: A Fingerprint Acquisition Laboratory for Improving Student Motivation and Commitment

Marija Bogicevic Sretenovic, Ivan Milenkovic, Bojan Jovanovic, Dejan Simic, Miroslav Minovic, Milos Milovanovic

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 3

Abstract

This paper presents a research study conducted in a specially developed laboratory for biometric engineering education. The laboratory gives students an opportunity to learn more about fingerprint acquisition and analyze the impact of acquisition on other parts of the biometric authentication process. An IoT approach was used, as different types of sensors (biometric sensors, thermometer, and humidity sensor) and components (heaters and workstations) were included in setting up a working surface for biometric data acquisition. Working surfaces create a network where data collected from each working station is recorded in a database. In parallel with biometric data acquisition, environmental condition parameters are recorded. Collected data is available to students for later analysis through the use of a specially developed visualization tool. In order to fully utilize the possibilities the laboratory provides, a flipped classroom approach was used. An evaluation study was done as a part of the course of Biometric technology held at the University of Belgrade. Research results show improvements in student learning outcomes and motivation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomedical and Engineering Education · Innovative Teaching Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia

Funding

Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Fingerprint Identification in Biometric Security Systems10.7763/IJCEE.2010.V2.239 ↗
2. Samkaria, R., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Sanket, R., Aggarwal, A., Yadav, M.S., Kumar, A., Pachauri, R., and Choudhury, S. (2018). Fingerprint Acquisition Methodologies and Its Upgradation with IoT. Intelligent Communication, Control and Devices, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-5903-2_52 ↗
3. On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00218-7 ↗
4. The implementation, deployment and evaluation of a mobile personal learning environment
5. Distributed incremental fingerprint identification with reduced database penetration rate using a hierarchical classification based on feature fusion and selection10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.014 ↗
6. Tatar, F.D. (2017). Fingerprint recognition algorithm. Computer Science & Information Technology, CNSA.10.5121/csit.2017.70609 ↗
7. Zhang, P., Liu, W., Yin, D., Shi, Y., and Xu, X. (2017, January 24–26). Analysis of fingerprint quality for season factor. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communication and Information Processing, Tokyo, Japan.10.1145/3162957.3163027 ↗
8. Reliability of biometric identification using fingerprints under adverse conditions
9. Olsen, M.A., Dusio, M., and Christoph Busch, C. (2015, January 3–4). Fingerprint skin moisture impact on biometric performance. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015), Gjovik, Norway.10.1109/IWBF.2015.7110223 ↗
10. Watson, C., Garris, M., Tabassi, E., Willson, C., McCabe, R., Jannet, S., and Ko, K. (2019, August 15). User’s Guide to NIST Biometric Image Software, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010), Available online: http://fingerprint.nist.gov/NBIS.
11. Modi, S.K., and Elliott, S.J. (2006, January 10–12). Impact of image quality on performance: Comparison of young and elderly fingerprints. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Soft Computing (RASC 2006), Canterbury, UK.
12. Kang, H., Lee, B., Kim, H., Shin, D., and Kim, J. (2003, January 9–11). A study on performance evaluation of fingerprint sensors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Guildford, UK.10.1007/3-540-44887-X_68 ↗
13. The smart classroom: Merging technologies for seamless tele-education10.1109/MPRV.2003.1203753 ↗
14. A comprehensive study of parameters in physical environment that impact students’ focus during lecture using Internet of Things10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.023 ↗
15. Developing a NFC-equipped smart classroom: Effects on attitudes toward computer science10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.002 ↗
16. An internet of things example: Classrooms access control over near field communication10.3390/s140406998 ↗
17. Interaction system based on internet of things as support for education10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.019 ↗
18. An approach to develop the smart health using Internet of Things and authentication based on biometric technology10.1016/j.future.2018.09.024 ↗
19. An introduction to biometric recognition10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349 ↗
20. An introduction evaluating biometric systems10.1109/2.820040 ↗
21. Case studies and the flipped classroom
22. Effect of human-biometric sensor interaction on fingerprint matching performance, image quality and minutiae count10.1504/IJCAT.2009.024079 ↗
23. (2019, September 20). Guide to Fingerprint Recognition, Digital Persona White Paper. Available online: http://www.digitalpersona.com.
24. (2019, September 10). Official Guide to Fingerprint Sensor Digital Persona. Available online: https://www.hfteco.com/product/Windows_Java_Development_Fingerprint_Reader_,wireless_biometric_reader.html.
25. (2019, September 15). Official Guide to Fingerprint Sensor HF7000 NFC. Available online: https://www.hfteco.com/product/NFC-Card-Reader-Rfid-Bluetooth-Fingerprint-Scanner.html.
26. (2019, September 13). Official Guide to Fingerprint Sensor UPEK Eikon. Available online: https://www.neurotechnology.com/fingerprint-scanner-upek-eikon-solo.html.
27. (2019, October 05). Official Guide to Sourceafis. Available online: https://sourceafis.machinezoo.com/.
28. Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A.K., and Prabhakar, S. (2009). Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-84882-254-2 ↗
29. The meaning of the employee engagement10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x ↗
30. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 ↗
31. Motivation, learning, and technology: Applying the ARCS-V motivation model10.17275/per.16.06.3.2 ↗
32. Minovic, M., Milovanovic, M., Kovacevic, I., Minovic, J., and Starcevic, D. (2012). Motivational and cognitive aspects of applying educational games as a learning tool. Handbook of Research on Serious Games as Educational, Business and Research Tools, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-0149-9.ch046 ↗
33. The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school
34. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 ↗
35. Effects of Flipping the Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003 ↗
36. Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students10.1021/ed400868x ↗
37. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning10.1080/09588221.2014.967701 ↗
38. Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009 ↗
39. Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040 ↗
40. Motivational aspects of different learning contexts: “My mom won’t let me play this game…”10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.023 ↗
41. Krosnick, J.A., and Presser, S. (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. Handbook of Survey Research, Emerald Publishing Limited. [2nd ed.].
42. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales10.1177/147078530805000106 ↗
43. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data10.1037/pas0000648 ↗
44. Use of the ARCS model in education: A literature review10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019 ↗
45. Adjusting Felder-Silverman learning styles model for application in adaptive e-learning10.2298/PSI1201043M ↗