journal article·2019-12-03Open access

Supplier Selection and Performance Evaluation for High-Voltage Power Film Capacitors in a Fuzzy Environment

Chun-Ming Yang, Kuen-Suan Chen, Ting-Hsin Hsu, Chang-Hsien Hsu

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 23

Abstract

Rapid advances in technology have shortened the upgrade and replacement cycles in industries such as electronics, household appliances, and communication technologies. Within these industries, high-voltage power film capacitors have become indispensable electrical components due to their good electrical performance and high reliability. The selection and evaluation of suppliers of these capacitors is therefore increasingly important. Suppliers play a crucial role in the electronics industry; the quality of their products determines the degree to which the quality of the final product can be guaranteed. Supplier quality also affects the ability of all the members in a supply chain to control costs. Evaluation by decision-makers is highly significant in the supplier selection process. However, when the opinions of multiple decision-makers are combined, issues such as cognitive differences, fuzzy linguistics, and uncertainty are common. This study presents a supplier performance index SPL and derives the estimates of the index SPL and its statistical properties. The proposed index is not only helpful for the accurate measurement of supplier performance; it can also reduce cognitive differences among evaluators in the decision-making process (that is, the sample variability associated with the Likert scale). Evaluation scores for each criterion for the linguistic labels are converted to triangular fuzzy numbers in order to reduce ambiguity. Subsequently, integrated crisp values are obtained by defuzzification in a fuzzy inference system. A real-world case study of the supplier selection of high-voltage power film capacitors is provided to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Quality and Supply Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Business School, Guilin University of Technology, No. 12, Jiangan Rd., Guilin 541004, China

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung 41170, Taiwan

Department of Business Administration, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan

Department of Finance, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, North Dist., Taichung 404, Taiwan

Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guilin University of Technology · the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<535::AID-SMJ885>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
2. Suppliers capability and price analysis chart10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.010 ↗
3. A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.005 ↗
4. Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.003 ↗
5. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.018 ↗
6. Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach10.1016/j.autcon.2008.06.001 ↗
7. An evaluation of airline service quality using the fuzzy weighted SERVQUAL method10.1016/j.asoc.2010.07.010 ↗
8. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 ↗
9. A knowledge based fuzzy-probabilistic roadmap method for mobile robot navigation10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.055 ↗
10. Applying fuzzy theory in selecting the image quality factors of 3D televisions10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102841 ↗
11. Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.024 ↗
12. Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.013 ↗
13. Applying a linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model to the analysis of ICT suppliers’ offers10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.025 ↗
14. Garcia, N., Puente, J., Fernandez, I., and Priore, P. (2018). Suitability of a consensual fuzzy inference system to evaluate suppliers of strategic products. Symmetry, 10.10.3390/sym10010022 ↗
15. Supplier selection in nuclear power industry with extended VIKOR method under linguistic information10.1016/j.asoc.2016.07.023 ↗
16. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making10.1016/j.camwa.2006.08.037 ↗
17. Developing a supplier selection system through integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEA: a case study on an auto lighting system company in Taiwan10.1080/09537280903458348 ↗
18. A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014 ↗
19. An integrated method for supplier selection from the perspective of risk aversion10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.036 ↗
20. A multicriteria approach based on fuzzy QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.014 ↗
21. Process capability analysis based on minimum production cost and quality loss10.1007/s00170-008-1741-9 ↗
22. Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for green supplier selection10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.020 ↗
23. Decision support model for selecting and evaluating suppliers in the construction industry10.1590/S0101-74382012005000020 ↗
24. Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.007 ↗
25. Strategic purchasing participation, supplier selection, supplier evaluation and purchasing performance10.1080/00207543.2015.1047983 ↗
26. Multicriteria selection of the building material supplier using AHP and Fuzzy AHP10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001033 ↗
27. Resilient supplier selection using AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment
28. A customer based supplier selection process that combines quality function deployment, the analytic network process and a Markov chain10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.006 ↗
29. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078 ↗
30. A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.041 ↗
31. Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076 ↗
32. A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.197 ↗
33. Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs—Integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.063 ↗
34. Sustainability evaluation via variable precision rough set approach: A photovoltaic module supplier case study10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.248 ↗
36. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.019 ↗
37. A resilience approach for supplier selection: Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process and grey VIKOR techniques10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.175 ↗
38. Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015 ↗
39. Developing a fuzzy green supplier selection model using six sigma quality indices10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.005 ↗
40. Feng, Y., Zhang, Z., Tian, G., Fathollahi-Fard, A.M., Hao, N., Li, Z., Wang, W., and Tan, J. (2019). A novel hybrid fuzzy grey TOPSIS method: Supplier evaluation of a collaborative manufacturing enterprise. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183770 ↗
41. Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.038 ↗
42. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 ↗
43. Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm10.1007/s10845-014-1028-y ↗
44. Assessment of supplier quality performance of computer manufacturing industry by using ANP and DEMATEL10.1108/TQM-11-2012-0091 ↗
45. A new extension to PROMETHEE under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for solving supplier selection problem with linguistic preferences10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.028 ↗
46. Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.029 ↗
47. A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QFD10.1016/j.cie.2007.06.008 ↗
48. The application of control chart for defects and defect clustering in IC manufacturing based on fuzzy theory10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.050 ↗
49. Development of fuzzy process accuracy index for decision making problems10.1016/j.ins.2009.05.019 ↗
50. Yang, C.M., Lin, K.P., and Chen, K.S. (2019). Confidence interval based fuzzy evaluation model for an integrated-circuit packaging molding process. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9132623 ↗
51. A new process capability analysis chart approach on the chip resistor quality management10.1177/0954405413479790 ↗
52. Using a QCAC–Entropy–TOPSIS approach to measure quality characteristics and rank improvement priorities for all substandard quality characteristics10.1080/00207543.2013.865092 ↗
53. Construction of closed interval for process capability indices Cpu, Cpl, and Spk based on Boole’s inequality and de Morgan’s laws10.1080/00949655.2016.1182168 ↗
54. Applying MQCAC and fuzzy TOPSIS to improve the unleaded gasoline quality10.1520/JTE20150426 ↗
55. Developing a performance index with a Poisson process and an exponential distribution for operations management and continuous improvement10.1016/j.cam.2018.03.034 ↗
56. Process capability indices10.1080/00224065.1986.11978984 ↗
57. Performance assessment of processing and delivery times for very large scale integration using process capability indices10.1007/s001700200186 ↗
58. Fuzzy evaluation of process capability for bigger-the-best type products10.1007/s00170-002-1398-8 ↗
59. Two-phase selection framework that considers production costs of suppliers and quality requirements of buyers10.1080/00207543.2019.1566663 ↗