An Approach to Constructing a Knowledge Graph Based on Korean Open-Government Data
Source abstract
Abstract
A data platform collecting the whole metadata held by government agencies and a knowledge graph showing the relationship between the collected open-government data are proposed in this paper. By practically applying the data platform and the knowledge graph to the public sector in Korea, three improvements were expected: (1) enhancing user accessibility across open-government data; (2) allowing users to acquire relevant data as well as desired data with a single query; and (3) enabling data-driven decision-making. In particular, the barriers for citizens to acquire the necessary data have been greatly reduced by using the proposed knowledge graph, which is considered to be important for data-driven decision-making. The reliability and feasibility of constructing a metadata-based open-data platform and a knowledge graph are estimated to be considerably high as the proposed approach is applied to a real service of the public sector in Korea.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: E-Government and Public Services · Data Quality and Management · Access Control and Trust
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Open Data, National Information Society Agency, Daegu 41068, Korea
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. OECD (2015). Data-Driven Innovation Big Data for Growth and Well-Being (Electronic Resource), OECD Publishing.
2. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 ↗
3. Tammisto, Y., and Lindman, J. (2012, January 18–20). Definition of open data services in software business. Proceedings of the International Conference of Software Business, Cambridge, MA, USA.10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_28 ↗
4. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., and Tarabanis, K. (2013, January 16–19). Linked open government data analytics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Government, Koblenz, Germany.10.1145/2491845.2491869 ↗
5. Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.003 ↗
6. Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001 ↗
7. Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003 ↗
8. An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006 ↗
9. Lenat, D.B., and Guha, R.V. (1989). Building Large Knowledge Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing.
10. Xu, S., Bao, S., Fei, B., Su, Z., and Yu, Y. (2008, January 20–24). Exploring folksonomy for personalized search. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Singapore.10.1145/1390334.1390363 ↗
11. A probability-based unified framework for semantic search and recommendation10.1177/0165551513480100 ↗
12. OWL-QL—A language for deductive query answering on the Semantic Web10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.002 ↗
13. ONTOWEB: Implementing an ontology-based Web retrieval system10.1002/asi.20220 ↗
14. Kumar, V.K. (2019). Knowledge Representation Technologies Using Semantic Web. Web Services: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-7501-6.ch056 ↗
15. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., and Weikum, G. (2007, January 8–12). Yago: A core of semantic knowledge. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, AB, Canada.10.1145/1242572.1242667 ↗
16. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., and Ives, Z. (2007). Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. The Semantic Web, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52 ↗
17. A pragmatic approach to model and exploit the semantics of product information10.1007/11890591_9 ↗
18. Objectrank: Authority-based keyword search in databases
19. Rocha, C., Schwabe, D., and Aragao, M.P. (2004, January 17–20). A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/988672.988723 ↗
20. Jeh, G., and Widom, J. (2002, January 23–26). SimRank: A measure of structural-context similarity. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1145/775047.775126 ↗
21. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X ↗
22. Haveliwala, T.H. (2002, January 7–11). Topic-sensitive pagerank. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/511446.511513 ↗
23. A semantic similarity measure for linked data: An information content-based approach10.1016/j.knosys.2016.07.012 ↗
24. Baeze-Yates, R., and Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.
25. (2019, September 30). Ministry of Interior Safety. Available online: https://www.data.go.kr/ndm/view.do.