The Effects of Dry, Humid and Wear Conditions on the Antimicrobial Efficiency of Triclosan-Containing Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of triclosan-containing polyester surfaces under various conditions at concentrations of between 400 ppm and 850 ppm. Staphylococcus aureus was chosen for the tests because it rapidly develops resistance to many antimicrobial agents. The results show that dry and humid conditions have bacteriostatic activity that inhibits the growth of S. aureus, with a greater effect under dryness (p < 0.05). Further, concentrations as low as 400 ppm showed activities of 0.99 log10 and 0.19 log10 for dry and humid conditions, respectively. The study of the association between triclosan concentrations and bacterial inhibition showed a high correlation for dry (R2 = 0.968) and humid conditions (R2 = 0.986). Under wear conditions, triclosan showed a gradual reduction in its bacteriostatic activity due to successive washing/drying treatments (p < 0.05). Thus, the use of triclosan in low concentrations is suggested as achieving bacteriostatic activity. Moreover, its use can be considered as complementary to the cleaning and disinfection procedures carried out in the food industry. However, it must not replace them. Manufacturing processes must be improved to preserve the triclosan properties in the antimicrobial materials to control microorganisms involved in cross-contamination between surfaces and food.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Travessera dels Turons s/n, CP 08193 Barcelona, Spain
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand10.1093/eurrag/jbi011 ↗
2. Future challenges to microbial food safety10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.015 ↗
3. World Health Organization (WHO) (2015). WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015, WHO Library Cataloguing-In-Publication Data. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/199350.
4. A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008 ↗
5. Review on bacterial biofilm: An universal cause of contamination10.1016/j.bcab.2016.05.002 ↗
6. Biofilms in the spotlight: Detection, quantification, and removal methods10.1111/1541-4337.12378 ↗
7. Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00540-8 ↗
8. Food contamination during food process10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.004 ↗
9. Development of a peroxide biodetector for a direct detection of biofilms produced by catalase-positive bacteria on food-contact surfaces10.1080/19476337.2017.1418434 ↗
10. Microbial biofilms in the food processing industry—Should they be a concern?10.1016/0168-1605(94)90047-7 ↗
11. Biofilm formation in food industries: A food safety concern10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.001 ↗
12. Evaluation of disinfectants in the domestic environment under “in use” conditions10.1017/S0022172400064214 ↗
13. Disinfection and the prevention of infectious disease10.1067/mic.2003.49 ↗
14. Recontamination as a source of pathogens in processed foods10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00295-2 ↗
15. Biodegradation of triclosan by a wastewater microorganism10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.025 ↗
16. Occupational asthma caused by sensitization to a cleaning product containing triclosan10.1016/j.anai.2016.12.001 ↗
17. Risk assessment of triclosan in the global environment using a probabilistic approach10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.05.020 ↗
18. Evaluation of the antibacterial effect of a triclosan-containing floor used in the food industry10.4315/0362-028X-69.3.627 ↗
19. Barros-Velázquez, J. (2016). Antimicrobial food packaging incorporated with triclosan. Antimicrobial Food Packaging, Academic Press.
20. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2019, January 22). Opinion on Triclosan, Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_023.pdf.
21. Triclosan: A critical review of the experimental data and development of margins of safety for consumer products10.3109/10408441003667514 ↗
22. Occurrence, efficacy, metabolism, and toxicity of triclosan10.1080/10590501.2010.504978 ↗
23. Is triclosan a neurotoxic agent?10.1080/10937404.2017.1281181 ↗
24. Triclosan exposure, transformation, and human health effects10.1080/10937404.2017.1399306 ↗
25. Triclosan antimicrobial polymers10.3934/molsci.2016.1.88 ↗
26. Resistance mechanisms of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00042-8 ↗
27. Whither triclosan?10.1093/jac/dkh171 ↗
28. Triclosan and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria: An overview10.1089/mdr.2006.12.83 ↗
29. Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus on food contact surfaces with different surface characteristics to chemical sanitizers10.1111/jfs.12354 ↗
30. Fetsch, A. (2018). Staphylococcus aureus—A foodborne pathogen: Epidemiology, detection, characterization, prevention, and control: An overview. Staphylococcus Aureus, Academic Press.
31. Holban, A., and Grumezescu, A. (2018). Staphylococcus aureus, a food pathogen: Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. Foodborne Diseases, Academic Press.
32. Staphylococcus and biofilms10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02827.x ↗
33. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under food-related stress conditions10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.017 ↗
34. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 ↗
35. High pressure inactivation of microorganisms inoculated into ovine milk of different fat contents10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74928-9 ↗
36. Bactericidal efficacy of peracetic acid in combination with hydrogen peroxide against pathogenic and non pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus spp., Listeria spp. and Escherichia coli10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.02.014 ↗
37. Long-term antibacterial efficacy of disinfectants based on benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite tested on surfaces against resistant gram-positive bacteria10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.06.008 ↗
38. Antimicrobial resistance: The example of Staphylococcus aureus10.1172/JCI18535 ↗
39. Worldwide epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of staphylococcus aureus10.1007/82_2016_3 ↗
40. Fetsch, A. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance properties of Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus Aureus, Academic Press.
41. Anonymous (2015). Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics. Quantitative Non-Porous Surface Test for the Evaluation of Bactericidal and/or Fungicidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants Used In Food, Industrial, Domestic and Institutional Areas. Test Method and Requirements without Mechanical Action (Phase 2, Step 2), European Standard. EN 13697:2015.
42. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2011). ISO 22196:2011. Measurement of Antibacterial Activity on Plastics and Other Non-Porous Surfaces, ISO.
43. Biofilm formation of Flavobacterium psychrophilum on various substrates10.1111/are.13849 ↗
44. The effectiveness of triclosan incorporated plastic against bacteria on beef surfaces10.4315/0362-028X-62.5.474 ↗
45. Effects of triclosan incorporation into ABS plastic on biofilm communities10.1093/jac/dkh196 ↗
46. Assessment of the antibacterial activity of a triclosan-containing cutting board10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.017 ↗
47. The effect of temperature and relative humidity on the survival of bacteria attached to dry solid surfaces10.1111/j.1472-765X.1988.tb01258.x ↗
48. Assessing bactericidal properties of materials: The case of metallic surfaces in contact with air10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00371-2 ↗
49. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00012.x ↗
50. Comparative testing of disinfectants using proposed European surface test methods10.1111/j.1472-765X.1993.tb01439.x ↗
51. Hunsinger, B., Abele, A., and Böhm, R. (2005, January 4–8). Effects of the drying conditions on different Gram negative bacteria on stainless steel discs used in the “quantitative surface test for the evaluation of bactericidal activity of chemical disinfectants” (EN 14349). Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress in Animal Hygiene (ISAH 2005), Warsaw, Poland.
52. Establishment of incubation conditions to optimize the in vitro formation of mature Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on food-contact surfaces10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.054 ↗
53. Desiccation tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus10.1007/s00203-010-0653-x ↗
54. Effect of different environmental conditions on the bacteria survival on stainless steel surfaces10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.04.013 ↗
55. Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic10.1128/JCM.38.2.724-726.2000 ↗
56. Contamination of hands and work surfaces with Salmonella enteritidis PT4 during the preparation of egg dishes10.1017/S0950268800068412 ↗
57. Triclosan in water, implications for human and environmental health10.1186/s40064-016-3287-x ↗
58. Triclosan: A widespread environmental toxicant with many biological effects10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010715-103417 ↗
59. Reproductive endocrine-disrupting effects of triclosan: Population exposure, present evidence and potential mechanisms10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.001 ↗
60. Antimicrobial strategies to reduce polymer biomaterial infections and their economic implications and considerations10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.10.005 ↗
61. Exposure to triclosan among the Canadian population: Results of the Canadian health measures survey (2009–2013)10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.029 ↗
62. Systematic review of the literature on triclosan and health outcomes in humans10.1080/10408444.2017.1350138 ↗
63. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of triclosan grafted onto cellulosic fibers10.1007/s12221-018-8285-x ↗
64. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2016). FDA Issues Final Rule on Safety and Effectiveness of Antibacterial Soaps. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm517478.htm.10.1016/j.fos.2016.10.021 ↗
65. The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780 ↗
66. Khan, R., Roy, N., Choi, K., and Lee, S.-W. (2018). Distribution of triclosan-resistant genes in major pathogenic microorganisms revealed by metagenome and genome-wide analysis. PLoS ONE, 13, Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192277.10.1371/journal.pone.0192277 ↗
67. Triclosan: Environmental exposure, toxicity and mechanisms of action10.1002/jat.1660 ↗
68. Developmental toxicity of triclosan in the presence of dissolved organic carbon: Moving beyond standard acute toxicity assays to understand ecotoxicological risk10.1089/zeb.2015.1220 ↗
69. Triclosan: A review on systematic risk assessment and control from the perspective of substance flow analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.002 ↗
70. Triclosan: Applications and safety10.1016/S0196-6553(96)90017-6 ↗