journal article·2018-06-12Open access

Artificial Neural Networks as Metamodels for the Multiobjective Optimization of Biobutanol Production

Ahmed Elmeligy, Poupak Mehrani, Jules Thibault

Applied Sciences· Volume 8· Issue 6

Abstract

Process optimization using a physical process or its comprehensive model often requires a significant amount of time. To remedy this problem, metamodels, or surrogate models, can be used. In this investigation, a methodology for optimizing the biobutanol production process via the integrated acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation–membrane pervaporation process is proposed. In this investigation, artificial neural networks (ANNs) were used as metamodels in an attempt to reduce the time needed to circumscribe the Pareto domain and identify the best optimal operating conditions. Two different metamodels were derived from a small set of operating conditions obtained from a uniform experimental design. The first series of metamodels were derived to entirely replace the phenomenological model of the butanol fermentation process by representing the relationship that exists between five operating conditions and four performance criteria. The second series of metamodels were derived to estimate the initial concentrations under steady-state conditions for the eight chemical species within the fermenter in order to expedite convergence of the process simulator. The first series of metamodels led to an accurate Pareto domain and reduced the computation time to circumscribe the Pareto domain by a factor of 2500. The second series of metamodels led to only a small reduction of computation time (a factor of approximately 2) because of the inherently slow convergence of the overall fermentation process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Process Optimization and Integration · Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, 161 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Thibault, J., Filho, R.M., Dias, M.O.S., Junqueira, T.L., Cavalett, O., Jesus, C.D.F., Rossell, C.E.V., and Bonomi, A. (2012, January 28–31). Simulation and multi-objective optimization of vacuum ethanol fermentation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH 2012), Rome, Italy.
2. Process modeling with neural networks using small experimental datasets10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00282-3 ↗
3. Comparison of experimental designs using neural networks10.1002/cjce.20233 ↗
4. Genetic manipulation of acid formation pathways by gene inactivation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 82410.1099/13500872-142-8-2079 ↗
5. Continuous acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation using immobilized cells ofClostridium acetobutylicum in a packed bed reactor and integration with product removal by pervaporation10.1002/bit.260380510 ↗
6. Mathematical modelling of clostridial acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation10.1007/s00253-017-8137-4 ↗
7. Liao, C., Seo, S.-O., and Lu, T. (2016). System-level modeling of acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 363.10.1093/femsle/fnw074 ↗
8. Separation techniques in butanol production: Challenges and developments10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.003 ↗
9. High performance ceramic hollow fiber supported PDMS composite pervaporation membrane for bio-butanol recovery10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.039 ↗
10. Azimi, H. (2017). Pervaporation Separation of Butanol Using PDMS Mixed Matrix Membranes. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ottawa].
11. Modelling of the acetone-butanol fermentation with cell retention10.1002/cjce.5450640413 ↗
12. Kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of acetone-butanol-ethanol production10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.05.005 ↗
13. Buehler, E.A., and Mesbah, A. (2016). Kinetic study of acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation in continuous culture. PLoS ONE.10.1371/journal.pone.0158243 ↗
14. Microbial production of a biofuel (acetone–butanol–ethanol) in a continuous bioreactor: Impact of bleed and simultaneous product removal10.1007/s00449-012-0766-5 ↗
15. Multi-objective optimization for chemical processes and controller design: Approximating and classifying the Pareto domain10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.010 ↗
16. Rangaiah, P.G. (2009). Net Flow and Rough Sets: Two Methods for Ranking the Pareto Domain. Multi-Objective Optimization—Techniques and Applications in Chemical Engineering. Advances in Process Systems Engineering, World Scientific.
17. Aureobasidium pullulans batch cultivations based on a factorial design for improving the production and molecular weight of exopolysaccharides10.1016/j.procbio.2007.01.013 ↗
18. An algorithm for the use of surrogate models in modular flowsheet optimization10.1002/aic.11579 ↗
19. Uniform Design: Theory and Application10.1080/00401706.2000.10486045 ↗
20. Yeung, K. (2018, January 13). The Uniform Design. Available online: http://www.math.hkbu.edu.hk/UniformDesign.
21. Al-Begain, K., Fiems, D., and Knottenbelt, W. (2010, January 14–16). Neural Networks as Surrogate Models for Measurements in Optimization Algorithms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Analytical and Stochastic Modeling Techniques and Applications (ASMTA 2010), Cardiff, UK.10.1007/978-3-642-13568-2 ↗
22. Machine learning model and optimization of a PSA unit for methane-nitrogen separation10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.05.006 ↗
23. Oscillations in chemical systems. 18. Mechanisms of chemical oscillators: Conceptual bases10.1021/ar50114a004 ↗