Show source-provided references
1. Anshuk, G., Magar, C., and Roger, R. (2014). How Technology Can Drive the Next Wave of Mass Customization: Seven Technologies Are Making It Easier to Tailor Products and Services to the Wants of Individual Customers—And Still Make a Profit, Business Technology Office, McKinsey & Company.
2. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., and Otto, B. (2016, January 5–8). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA.
10.1109/HICSS.2016.488 ↗3. Forschungsunion, and Acatech (2021, August 30). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0 Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Available online: https://www.Gateway-bayern.de/BV041628398.
4. Pozzi, R., Rossi, T., and Secchi, R. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies: Critical success factors for implementation and improvements in manufacturing companies. Prod. Plan. Control, 1–21.
10.1080/09537287.2021.1891481 ↗5. Hope, K. (2021). Annual Report on European SMEs 2020/2021: Digitalisation of SMEs: Background Document, Publications Office of the European Union.
6. Not so disruptive yet?
9. Katalinic, B. (2019, January 20–27). Lean Automation for Low-Volume Manufacturing Environment. Proceedings of the 30th International DAAAM Symposium 2019, Zadar, Croatia.
10. Miqueo, A., Torralba, M., and Yagüe-Fabra, J.A. (2020). Lean Manual Assembly 4.0: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 10.
10.3390/app10238555 ↗13. Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song, H., and Rawat, D.B. (2017). Industrial Internet of Things, Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-319-42559-7 ↗14. What are the important technologies for bin picking? Technology analysis of robots in competitions based on a set of performance metrics
15. Pantano, M., Blumberg, A., Regulin, D., Hauser, T., Saenz, J., and Lee, D. (2021, January 28–29). Design of a collaborative modular end effector considering human values and safety requirements for industrial use cases. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Human-Friendly Robotics (HFR 2021), Bologna, Italy.
10.1007/978-3-030-96359-0_4 ↗16. Eiband, T., Willibald, C., Tannert, I., Weber, B., and Lee, D. (Auton. Robot., 2022). Collaborative Programming of Robotic Task Decisions and Recovery Behaviors, Auton. Robot., in press.
10.1007/s10514-022-10062-9 ↗17. Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: A systematic literature review
10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101998 ↗18. Bauer, W., Bender, M., Braun, M., Rally, P., and Scholtz, O. (2016). Lightweight Robots in Manual Assembly—Best to Start Simply: Examining Companies’ Initial Experiences with Lightweight Robots, Frauenhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO.
19. Saenz, J., Elkmann, N., Gibaru, O., and Neto, P. (2018, January 7–11). Survey of methods for design of collaborative robotics applications—Why safety is a barrier to more widespread robotics uptake. Proceedings of the ICMRE 2018: 2018 4th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Valenciennes, France.
10.1145/3191477.3191507 ↗20. (2010). Safety of Machinery—General Principles for Design—Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction, Version 1. Standard No. ISO 12100:2010.
22. Awad, R., Fechter, M., and van Heerden, J. (2017, January 12–15). Integrated risk assessment and safety consideration during design of HRC workplaces. Proceedings of the 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Limassol, Cyprus.
10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247648 ↗23. Inam, R., Raizer, K., Hata, A., Souza, R., Forsman, E., Cao, E., and Wang, S. (2018, January 4–7). Risk Assessment for Human-Robot Collaboration in an automated warehouse scenario. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Turin, Italy.
10.1109/ETFA.2018.8502466 ↗27. (2006). Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on Machinery and Amending Directive 95/16/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union, L157, 24–86.
28. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2022, March 03). Interpretation Paper on Substantial Modification to Machinery. Available online: https://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Arbeitsschutz/en-interpretation-paper-substantial-modification-to-machinery.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.
30. Grefen, P.W., and Boultadakis, G. (2021). Designing an Integrated System for Smart Industry: Designing an Integrated System for Smart Industry, Departmental Office IE&IS, Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences.
31. Zanetti, R. (2022, February 28). Deliverable 1.2—OPIL Architecture. Available online: http://www.l4ms.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables/D1.2.pdf.
32. Zimniewicz, M. (2022, February 28). Deliverable 3.2—SHOP4CF Architecture. Available online: https://elk.adalidda.com/2021/05/SHOP4CF-WP3-D32-DEL-210119-v1.0.pdf.
34. Lübke, D., and Pautasso, C. (2019). Developing Process Execution Support for High-Tech Manufacturing Processes. Empirical Studies on the Development of Executable Business Processes, Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-030-17666-2 ↗35. West, M. (2011). Developing High Quality Data Models, Morgan Kaufmann.
36. (2013). Enterprise-Control System Integration. Standard No. IEC-62264.
39. IDEF*: A comprehensive modelling methodology for the development of manufacturing enterprise systems
10.1080/002075499189790 ↗41. OMG (2022, March 08). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0.2. Available online: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2.
42. García-Domínguez, A., Marcos, M., and Medina, I. (2011, January 21–23). A comparison of BPMN 2.0 with other notations for manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 4th Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference (MESIC 2011), Cadiz, Spain.
10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.502.1 ↗43. Defining a Methodology to Design and Implement Business Process Models in BPMN According to the Standard ANSI/ISA-95 in a Manufacturing Enterprise
10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.283 ↗44. Erasmus, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Traganos, K., and Grefen, P. (2018, January 16–19). The Case for Unified Process Management in Smart Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Stockholm, Sweden.
10.1109/EDOC.2018.00035 ↗45. Zor, S., Leymann, F., and Schumm, D. (2011, January 1–3). A proposal of BPMN extensions for the manufacturing domain. Proceedings of the 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Madison, WI, USA.
46. King, R. (2019). Internet of Things-Aware Process Modeling: Integrating IoT Devices as Business Process Resources. Active Flow and Combustion Control 2018, Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-319-98177-2 ↗47. Petrasch, R., and Hentschke, R. (2016, January 13–15). Process modeling for industry 4.0 applications: Towards an industry 4.0 process modeling language and method. Proceedings of the 2016 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Khon Kaen, Thailand.
10.1109/JCSSE.2016.7748885 ↗48. Abouzid, I., and Saidi, R. (2019, January 25–26). Proposal of BPMN extensions for modelling manufacturing processes. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA), Kenitra, Morocco.
10.1109/ICOA.2019.8727651 ↗49. Schonberger, D., Lindorfer, R., and Froschauer, R. (2018, January 18–20). Modeling Workflows for Industrial Robots Considering Human-Robot-Collaboration. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto, Portugalt.
10.1109/INDIN.2018.8471999 ↗50. Froschauer, R., and Lindorfer, R. (2019, January 9–10). Workflow-based programming of human-robot interaction for collaborative assembly stations. Proceedings of the ARG & OAGM Workshop, Steyr, Austria.
51. Lindorfer, R., Froschauer, R., and Schwarz, G. (2018, January 18–20). ADAPT—A decision-model-based Approach for Modeling Collaborative Assembly and Manufacturing Tasks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto, Portugal.
10.1109/INDIN.2018.8472064 ↗52. Evaluation of a Digital Worker Assistance System to enable Adaptive Task Sharing between Humans and Cobots in Manufacturing
10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.007 ↗53. (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices—Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots—Part 2: Robot Systems and Integration, Version 1. Standard No. ISO 10218-2:2011.
54. (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices—Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots—Part 1: Robots, Version 2. Standard No. ISO 10218-1:2011.
55. Saenz, J., Fassi, I., Prange-Lasonder, G.B., Valori, M., Bidard, C., Lassen, A.B., and Bessler-Etten, J. (2021, January 8–10). COVR Toolkit—Supporting safety of interactive robotics applications. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), Magdeburg, Germany.
10.1109/ICHMS53169.2021.9582659 ↗56. (2016). Robots and Robotic Devices—Collaborative Robots, Version 1. Standard No. ISO/TS 15066:2016.
57. Palli, G., Melchiorri, C., and Meattini, R. (2022). Design of a Collaborative Modular End Effector Considering Human Values and Safety Requirements for Industrial Use Cases. Human-Friendly Robotics 2021, Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-030-96359-0 ↗58. (2012). Safety of Machinery—Risk Assessment—Part 2: Practical Guidance and Examples of Methods, Version 2. Standard No. ISO/TR 14121-2:2012.
59. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale, CRC Press. Usability evaluation in industry.